Jump to content

Jones UP!! (Franco DFA)


Yardball85

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, billhatf said:

There's a girl catching for Texas in little league who blocks pitches better than severino.   Pick any catcher in the minors and bring them up. Doesn't have to be Adley. Severino must go.

I like Pedro but it really is bad and for a rebuilding club focused on fundamentals…..makes zero sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

I don't disagree and that might be what we see them do.   As bad as Severino has been on offense, it's doubtful any of the catchers you mentioned would be anywhere near as good in that department.

 I have annoyed a lot of people by saying I don’t care about offense from catcher as much as I care about defense. AR can wait. But I would be very happy to bring up our best defender and let him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RZNJ said:

I don't think that's a guarantee.  What's he projected to get in arbitration.  Depends on that amount and how much to replace him with a ML caliber catcher.  They need a catcher until Adley come up and then someone to share time with him.

It'd better be a guarantee.  I don't care if somehow he just stays at the MLB minimum, he's still over paid.   One of the most exciting things about next year for me is to never see Severino in an Os uniform again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

Awful 

I wouldn't shed too many tears.  They were doing Franco a favor by keeping him on the roster this long.  Most teams probably would have DFA'd him back in June.   You can't play 3B and OPS .650 pr whatever he was hitting in the MLB and expect to stay on the roster for very long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, forphase1 said:

It'd better be a guarantee.  I don't care if somehow he just stays at the MLB minimum, he's still over paid.   One of the most exciting things about next year for me is to never see Severino in an Os uniform again.

Severino would have to get paid around $2M to $3M by the Orioles to sign him for next year. There's no way he gets tendered when Rutschman is going to takeover as catcher around May or possibly sooner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Severino would have to get paid around $2M to $3M by the Orioles to sign him for next year. There's no way he gets tendered when Rutschman is going to takeover as catcher around May or possibly sooner. 

The offseason before we brought up Wieters, we traded Ramon Hernandez and signed Gregg Zaun ($1.5 mm) and Chad Moeller ($800 k).   Then we traded Zaun about 2 months after Wieters arrived.   I agree we’ll look for a cheaper option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, billhatf said:

There's a girl catching for Texas in little league who blocks pitches better than severino.   Pick any catcher in the minors and bring them up. Doesn't have to be Adley. Severino must go.

Maverick Handley, then the Orioles would probably be the fastest team ever to play.  I think that would make Mountcastle the slowest position player on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...