Jump to content

Is Matt Chapman a potential trade target?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Yossarian said:

I'd completely forgotten Sabo played for the O's.  I always remembered him as a Red.

It was one season 1994 which was forgettable thanks to the strike. It was also the beginnings of Angelos meddling with roster decisions and his preference to play Leo Gomez over Sabo at 3B. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/sports/1995/04/11/this-year-gomez-has-a-job-to-do/a341bf5b-1646-4108-9be3-34e74140e891/

Quote

If Gomez continues to produce as he did last season, the Orioles can be thankful they didn't listen to former manager Johnny Oates, who was the most adamant of the organization's decision-makers about getting rid of Gomez. Oates's preference for Sabo over Gomez nearly got him fired last year a few months before he actually was dismissed. In fact, if not for the intervention of majority owner Peter Angelos, the Orioles almost certainly would have released Gomez early in the '94 season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

It was one season 1994 which was forgettable thanks to the strike. It was also the beginnings of Angelos meddling with roster decisions and his preference to play Leo Gomez over Sabo at 3B. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/sports/1995/04/11/this-year-gomez-has-a-job-to-do/a341bf5b-1646-4108-9be3-34e74140e891/

 

He couldn't look more thrilled in that picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Why would you make trades before you even figure out your core?

You already know your main core..Means, GRod, Adley, Mullins (if he holds up) and maybe Mountcastle, depending on how you feel About him.

Add in a TOR starter and a Chapman or Bryant and you have your core.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Our next contending team in 2024,

Grod, Hall, ?, ?, ?

T.Wells, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?

1B Mountcastle 

2B Vavra

3B Gunnar

SS Westburg 

LF Cowser

CF Mullins

RF Elijah Greene

DH Mayo/Stowers

C AR

You build on that core. Not subtract for anything for 2022 or 2023

Zero chance of this being the next contending team, especially by 2024.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Our next contending team in 2024,

Grod, Hall, ?, ?, ?

T.Wells, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?

1B Mountcastle 

2B Vavra

3B Gunnar

SS Westburg 

LF Cowser

CF Mullins

RF Elijah Greene

DH Mayo/Stowers

C AR

You build on that core. Not subtract for anything for 2022 or 2023

You were banking on 2023 as the turn around the other day I thought. Anyhow, if it's 2024 now, they may want to start searching for the next GM or whatever title Baltimore hands out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at Chapman’s batted ball data on Baseball Savant, there are some reasons for concern.  His average exit velocity is down from about 93 mph in 2018-20 to 89.3 this year.  His max exit velocity is also down about 3 mph.  His K% was 22-24% in 2018-19 but has been 31-35% the last two years.   If we were to acquire him, I wouldn’t be valuing him on the assumption his bat is going to bounce back.   By the way, he had surgery on a torn hip labrum last year, so the lingering effects of that could be the reason for his declining EV and increasing K rate.   

Then my other question is, why do we want to acquire a player who’s only under control for two years and will be pretty expensive?   Sure he’s an upgrade but is he going to help us when we are ready to contend?   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Looking at Chapman’s batted ball data on Baseball Savant, there are some reasons for concern.  His average exit velocity is down from about 93 mph in 2018-20 to 89.3 this year.  His max exit velocity is also down about 3 mph.  His K% was 22-24% in 2018-19 but has been 31-35% the last two years.   If we were to acquire him, I wouldn’t be valuing him on the assumption his bat is going to bounce back.   By the way, he had surgery on a torn hip labrum last year, so the lingering effects of that could be the reason for his declining EV and increasing K rate.   

Then my other question is, why do we want to acquire a player who’s only under control for two years and will be pretty expensive?   Sure he’s an upgrade but is he going to help us when we are ready to contend?   
 

Voice of reason, great analytical work here. Sure I'd take on Chapman's salary for free if Beane didnt want to pay it But I wouldnt give up a top 100 guy for him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...