Jump to content

Cedric Mullins - 30/30 ?


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

He's awesome. Unquestionably. Love the guy and hope he reaches 30/30, which I think he will. 

However, I'm gonna be that guy and bring up the fact that his defense has been pretty (read: hugely?) disappointing this season. I didn't really notice it until I started to note a string of batted balls that he probably should have caught with his speed out there. The numbers don't lie either: 

.984 F% with 5 errors

-4.8 UZR

-1.1 RngR

Pretty much every defensive metric I could find is below average. So that's something I hope he looks to improve in the offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

He's awesome. Unquestionably. Love the guy and hope he reaches 30/30, which I think he will. 

However, I'm gonna be that guy and bring up the fact that his defense has been pretty (read: hugely?) disappointing this season. I didn't really notice it until I started to note a string of batted balls that he probably should have caught with his speed out there. The numbers don't lie either: 

.984 F% with 5 errors

-4.8 UZR

-1.1 RngR

Pretty much every defensive metric I could find is below average. So that's something I hope he looks to improve in the offseason. 

I almost find it hard to believe that his defense from a true talent perspective is below average. His range alone should put him in the black IMO. I would want to know: is this a situation of a few flukey plays skewing the averages, something wonky about how OPACY OF is scored***, something more fundamental to his game, etc.?

*** This is a question that's been raised in the past that has never really been answered, I think there are some articles / detailed OH posts on it that I might try to dig up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BohKnowsBmore said:

I almost find it hard to believe that his defense from a true talent perspective is below average. His range alone should put him in the black IMO. I would want to know: is this a situation of a few flukey plays skewing the averages, something wonky about how OPACY OF is scored, something more fundamental to his game, etc.?

It takes a good two years of defensive data to show much of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

I almost find it hard to believe that his defense from a true talent perspective is below average. His range alone should put him in the black IMO. I would want to know: is this a situation of a few flukey plays skewing the averages, something wonky about how OPACY OF is scored, something more fundamental to his game, etc.?

Yeah maybe. Every few games it seems like he dives for a ball that he should catch and just doesn't come up with it. Or something drops in front of him, or gets behind him. It's weird. Other times he's smooth as silk and catches a ball no one else on the team could get to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

It takes a good two years of defensive data to show much of anything.

Fair point, but the eye test and the metrics line up in this case for me. I watch every single game and he just isn't making the plays he should make out there in my opinion. But it's also his first full season after not really playing much last year also. So I think the jury is still out for sure. He's a guy that will work to improve also. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

Fair point, but the eye test and the metrics line up in this case for me. I watch every single game and he just isn't making the plays he should make out there in my opinion. But it's also his first full season after not really playing much last year also. So I think the jury is still out for sure. He's a guy that will work to improve also. 

I'm not at all disagreeing with anything you said, I was just discussing the validity of defensive metrics over a small sample size.

If Mullins keeps hitting like this I'll take this level of defense.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cedric's gotta pick it up a little bit if he wants to get 30/30.

I'm not knocking him, not by any stretch.  But August wasn't great for him, he hit .252/.310/.485 for a .795 OPS.  He did, however, hit 7 homers and also stole 7 bases.  Obviously if he can repeat that, he hits 30/30.

We all need to remember that he's never played a full big league season before and he might be a little tired at this point.  That wouldn't be surprising.  I am hoping that's all that his recent slump is a result of and that most of this summer wasn't a mirage for him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Cedric's gotta pick it up a little bit if he wants to get 30/30.

I'm not knocking him, not by any stretch.  But August wasn't great for him, he hit .252/.310/.485 for a .795 OPS.  He did, however, hit 7 homers and also stole 7 bases.

We all need to remember that he's never played a full big league season before and he might be a little tired at this point.  That wouldn't be surprising.  I am hoping that's all that his recent slump is a result of and that most of this summer wasn't a mirage for him.  

Dog days...  + fatigue...

But the weather's cooling off.. and there's something to shoot for.

I'm hopeful

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

I almost find it hard to believe that his defense from a true talent perspective is below average. His range alone should put him in the black IMO. I would want to know: is this a situation of a few flukey plays skewing the averages, something wonky about how OPACY OF is scored***, something more fundamental to his game, etc.?

*** This is a question that's been raised in the past that has never really been answered, I think there are some articles / detailed OH posts on it that I might try to dig up

 

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It takes a good two years of defensive data to show much of anything.

 

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not at all disagreeing with anything you said, I was just discussing the validity of defensive metrics over a small sample size.

If Mullins keeps hitting like this I'll take this level of defense.

 

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

Anyway, now I feel bad for derailing this thread. I should have started a defense thread. 

COMMENSE THE 30/30 WATCH

 

To further derail the topic... These articles delve a bit into what I was talking about. I'm not sure this question has ever been satisfactorily answered one way or the other...

http://camdendepot.blogspot.com/2011/10/bad-outfield-defense-or-bad-fielding.html

https://medium.com/ro-baseball/outfielders-advanced-defensive-metrics-566911e28268

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Who woulda thunk it?   Cedric has 24 homers and 25 steals with about 30 games to go.   It's going to be close.    Besides already having a great breakout season, that would be a great accomplishment.   I don't believe an Oriole has ever done it.

He has 24 homers in 128 games which is a shade under 1 per 5 games so if he continues his seasonal pace, he should just make it.   Go Cedric!!!!!

LOVE!!! I LOVE Cedric and thanks for the thread/recognition! HUGE fan! I watched him play so much at Bowie. Always cheering for him!

Also, like how it was mentioned if Mateo improved on his bunting in the offseason (similar to Mullins) might help him even more.

One thing that sets Mullins apart, his worth ethic. A great leader to have around a club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It takes Orioles rookies 60 or 70 at bats to get their first two hits.
    • Tell me how can Harbaugh help him when he doesn't know how to help himself. Harbs is the worst at burning timeouts stupidly then not having any when they are needed at crunch time. 
    • Yes the same here. They are going to the playoffs and yet I have no feeling towards it whatsoever. Weird feeling. Like you just know they are going to get bounced in the first round. It looks inevitable. I mean you could make a case the Tigers are more deserving of the Orioles spot. They are playing some great baseball of late. 
    • Man Baltimore sports has not been kind. The Orioles are on a  3 month tailspin and the Ravens did what they do best and blew another double digit 4th quarter lead to a inferior team.  Let's see if the Orioles can right the ship,  though I'm not holding my breath on that one at all. Yikes. 
    • Idk how impactful this was, probably pretty low on the list of problems, but this is the 2nd straight week that Lamar threw the ball late in the game and the receiver was unable to get oob.  The ball to Bateman is probably excusable because we had more time on the clock and we needed the deep ball to be in position to make a run, but this time throwing a 12 yard dump to Andrews was just straight up stupid IMO.  I get that they're going to play outside leverage all day every day in this situation but just throw it away and try to take another shot.  Lamar has to have more clock awareness than that,  and Harbaugh has to instill in him the importance of saving those seconds on the clock.
    • Sorry but that response from Fuller sounds to me like too many words, concepts, abstractions, and if that's how he communicates, wordy and convoluted, it's a lot for hitters to carry "into the box." Not to mention all the specifics involved, re. what pitches and locations to look for, all the analytics of how to do the swing and torque the body, etc. I'm no coach but I can imagine a whole season of this approach just becomes information overload. Maybe it's not rocket science, after all (with all due respect to ex-NASA Sig). Maybe the antidote is more Zen: just see the pitch and hit the dang thing.  BTW I think the analytical, overthinking approach is better suited to the pitching side, where you can plan your attack based on all the data. Hitting is more reaction, no time to think. You can't beat pitching using the same approach--rather, need the opposite approach, to counter with instinct and intuition. At least, that's my cheap (2 cents) advice!
    • The proposition that every auction automatically results in an overpay is simplified indeed.  Granted, "kind of true" is a low bar to clear, but still...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...