Jump to content

Cedric Mullins - 30/30 ?


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

Mullins is also on track to become one of the half-dozen best non-pitchers ever on a terrible team.  I looked at every team that's finished with a .325 or lower winning percentage since 1893.  Only four non-pitchers have ever put up a 5-win season (rWAR) on one of those 50 teams, none in my lifetime:

Rusty Staub, 1969 Expos, 6.2
Harlond Clift, 1937 Browns, 7.1
Wally Berger, 1935 Braves, 5.8
Amos Strunk, 1916 A's, 5.6

Mullins isn't going to catch Clift, who is largely forgotten but was arguably the first modern, power-hitting third baseman.  But he might approach Strunk or Berger with a good September.

For pitchers, the best might be Randy Johnson in 2004.  On a 51-111 D'backs team he threw 260 innings to a 2.60 (176 ERA+) with 290 strikeouts and 8.4 rWAR.  Ted Breitenstein also had 8.8 rWAR for the 1895 Browns, but I'd take the Unit.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Mullins is also on track to become one of the half-dozen best non-pitchers ever on a terrible team.  I looked at every team that's finished with a .325 or lower winning percentage since 1893.  Only four non-pitchers have ever put up a 5-win season (rWAR) on one of those 50 teams, none in my lifetime:

Rusty Staub, 1969 Expos, 6.2
Harlond Clift, 1937 Browns, 7.1
Wally Berger, 1935 Braves, 5.8
Amos Strunk, 1916 A's, 5.6

Mullins isn't going to catch Clift, who is largely forgotten but was arguably the first modern, power-hitting third baseman.  But he might approach Strunk or Berger with a good September.

For pitchers, the best might be Randy Johnson in 2004.  On a 51-111 D'backs team he threw 260 innings to a 2.60 (176 ERA+) with 290 strikeouts and 8.4 rWAR.  Ted Breitenstein also had 8.8 rWAR for the 1895 Browns, but I'd take the Unit.

Steve Carlton comes immediately to mind.   He went 27-10 with an ERA of 1.97 for a team that was 59-97.   That’s above your .325 threshold but it was still amazing that Carlton got the win in 46% of Philly’s wins that year.  That was good for 12.1 rWAR.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Mullins is also on track to become one of the half-dozen best non-pitchers ever on a terrible team.  I looked at every team that's finished with a .325 or lower winning percentage since 1893.  Only four non-pitchers have ever put up a 5-win season (rWAR) on one of those 50 teams, none in my lifetime:

Rusty Staub, 1969 Expos, 6.2
Harlond Clift, 1937 Browns, 7.1
Wally Berger, 1935 Braves, 5.8
Amos Strunk, 1916 A's, 5.6

Mullins isn't going to catch Clift, who is largely forgotten but was arguably the first modern, power-hitting third baseman.  But he might approach Strunk or Berger with a good September.

For pitchers, the best might be Randy Johnson in 2004.  On a 51-111 D'backs team he threw 260 innings to a 2.60 (176 ERA+) with 290 strikeouts and 8.4 rWAR.  Ted Breitenstein also had 8.8 rWAR for the 1895 Browns, but I'd take the Unit.

This franchise has had some bad teams but some "grinders" who made the fanbase proud!  I love the way Ced plays the game!  ⚾

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, owknows said:

I'd almost bet that Cedric will be running every time he sniffs the basepaths...

(although they need to be careful not to be so reckless as to impact their post-season chances)

He had 7 steals without being caught last month, and has been successful in 21 of his last 24 attempts.   So, he’s been picking good spots.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Drungo, Steve Carlton with the Phillies didn't make that list? He had an incredible season with a terrible team.

The 1973 Phillies hold the 22nd-worst winning percentage in Phillies history.  There are looong stretches in Phillies history where they'd routinely finish 40 games out.  And for much of that time the A's weren't much better across town.  In 1942 the A's and Phils combined for 208 losses in 154 game schedules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The 1973 Phillies hold the 22nd-worst winning percentage in Phillies history.  There are looong stretches in Phillies history where they'd routinely finish 40 games out.  And for much of that time the A's weren't much better across town.  In 1942 the A's and Phils combined for 208 losses in 154 game schedules.

I was kinda hoping for his WAR that season compared to their record.  On my phone right now. Tough to look up.

 

Just saw Frobby's post. Great, old minds think alike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It takes Orioles rookies 60 or 70 at bats to get their first two hits.
    • Tell me how can Harbaugh help him when he doesn't know how to help himself. Harbs is the worst at burning timeouts stupidly then not having any when they are needed at crunch time. 
    • Yes the same here. They are going to the playoffs and yet I have no feeling towards it whatsoever. Weird feeling. Like you just know they are going to get bounced in the first round. It looks inevitable. I mean you could make a case the Tigers are more deserving of the Orioles spot. They are playing some great baseball of late. 
    • Man Baltimore sports has not been kind. The Orioles are on a  3 month tailspin and the Ravens did what they do best and blew another double digit 4th quarter lead to a inferior team.  Let's see if the Orioles can right the ship,  though I'm not holding my breath on that one at all. Yikes. 
    • Idk how impactful this was, probably pretty low on the list of problems, but this is the 2nd straight week that Lamar threw the ball late in the game and the receiver was unable to get oob.  The ball to Bateman is probably excusable because we had more time on the clock and we needed the deep ball to be in position to make a run, but this time throwing a 12 yard dump to Andrews was just straight up stupid IMO.  I get that they're going to play outside leverage all day every day in this situation but just throw it away and try to take another shot.  Lamar has to have more clock awareness than that,  and Harbaugh has to instill in him the importance of saving those seconds on the clock.
    • Sorry but that response from Fuller sounds to me like too many words, concepts, abstractions, and if that's how he communicates, wordy and convoluted, it's a lot for hitters to carry "into the box." Not to mention all the specifics involved, re. what pitches and locations to look for, all the analytics of how to do the swing and torque the body, etc. I'm no coach but I can imagine a whole season of this approach just becomes information overload. Maybe it's not rocket science, after all (with all due respect to ex-NASA Sig). Maybe the antidote is more Zen: just see the pitch and hit the dang thing.  BTW I think the analytical, overthinking approach is better suited to the pitching side, where you can plan your attack based on all the data. Hitting is more reaction, no time to think. You can't beat pitching using the same approach--rather, need the opposite approach, to counter with instinct and intuition. At least, that's my cheap (2 cents) advice!
    • The proposition that every auction automatically results in an overpay is simplified indeed.  Granted, "kind of true" is a low bar to clear, but still...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...