Jump to content

Dillon Tate Fangraphs interview


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I always thought it was good that Britton, O’Day, Brach and Givens brought four very different styles and arm angles to the back end of our bullpen.   

One of the things I read an article about Britton was that the opposing better always knew exactly what was coming. A sinker. That’s what was coming… Almost every time, didn’t need a trashcan you just knew.

And yet, he was successful. And that’s because his pitch was good. Like aesop’s cat that only had one trick that worked every time.

The guys we have aren’t that good, so the details, good bad or indifferent, matter much less.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

One of the things I read an article about Britton was that the opposing better always knew exactly what was coming. A sinker. That’s what was coming… Almost every time, didn’t need a trashcan you just knew.

And yet, he was successful. And that’s because his pitch was good. Like aesop’s cat that only had one trick that worked every time.

The guys we have aren’t that good, so the details, good bad or indifferent, matter much less.

It’s still very interesting to me to read about how lesser pitchers experiment with their pitches trying to find the formulation that will make them successful.  And, I think David Laurila (who did the interview) is a treasure.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s still very interesting to me to read about how lesser pitchers experiment with their pitches trying to find the formulation that will make them successful.  And, I think David Laurila (who did the interview) is a treasure.   

Oh yes that’s absolutely right, as I was reading it I was noticing how far the art of pitching has developed. In the olden days it was throw hard and in the strike zone and repeat until your arm fell off, these days you need a Hewlett Packard calculator to figure out how you’re going to throw and where.

I wish they would interview some of the really great control artists of the past, like Fergie Jenkins, who threw as many innings in one season as most of these guys do in three, or Maddox , and ask how they approached how they did what they did.

A true genius has no idea how he does what he does, and I think Nolan Ryan was that genius, and would be ineffective as a coach, But the guys who worked and thought and pondered and improved, those are the ones I’d like to hear from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...