Jump to content

Orioles sign Chris Owings


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

I'm really curious how the infield thing shakes out by opening day. 

By all accounts, Urias deserves to start somewhere. I just can't get behind any scenario where he's on the bench, unless he really struggles in spring training. His ABs are such a sight for sore eyes. 

Odor has a ML deal, which doesn't mean much, but he has an edge just by virtue of being on the 40-man roster. Unfortunately, he stinks and can kind of only play 2B. Maybe they make him play 3B, but that doesn't sound ideal. 

Gutierrez I really like defensively - I went back and watched some late-season highlights and he really was quite impressive. I think we are quick to forget just how refreshing he was after Franco was released. If he hits at ALL this spring, I'm giving him the 3B job without much thought. 

Mateo deserves playing time based on his pure talent, period. It would be a shame to see him relegated to the bench or DFA'd in favor of Odor.

Owings will absolutely make this team as a super utility. The fact that he can play the OF is a nice bonus. Hyde wants a veteran IF on the team.

So - my vote is Urias at 2B, Mateo at SS, Gutierrez at 3B, Owings on the bench, Odor released, Jones in AAA, Martin in AAA. 

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, interloper said:

I'm really curious how the infield thing shakes out by opening day. 

By all accounts, Urias deserves to start somewhere. I just can't get behind any scenario where he's on the bench, unless he really struggles in spring training. His ABs are such a sight for sore eyes. 

Odor has a ML deal, which doesn't mean much, but he has an edge just by virtue of being on the 40-man roster. Unfortunately, he stinks and can kind of only play 2B. Maybe they make him play 3B, but that doesn't sound ideal. 

Gutierrez I really like defensively - I went back and watched some late-season highlights and he really was quite impressive. I think we are quick to forget just how refreshing he was after Franco was released. If he hits at ALL this spring, I'm giving him the 3B job without much thought. 

Mateo deserves playing time based on his pure talent, period. It would be a shame to see him relegated to the bench or DFA'd in favor of Odor.

Owings will absolutely make this team as a super utility. The fact that he can play the OF is a nice bonus. Hyde wants a veteran IF on the team.

So - my vote is Urias at 2B, Mateo at SS, Gutierrez at 3B, Owings on the bench, Odor released, Jones in AAA, Martin in AAA. 

 

Maybe they keep Urias, Mateo, Gutierrez, Owings and Odor but only keep 4 outfielders.   Hays, Mullins, Santander and McKenna.    Option Stewart to AAA since Owings and Mateo can play the outfield.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Maybe they keep Urias, Mateo, Gutierrez, Owings and Odor but only keep 4 outfielders.   Hays, Mullins, Santander and McKenna.    Option Stewart to AAA since Owings and Mateo can play the outfield.

Yeah after I posted this I realized there's probably room for one more IF on the roster. So I agree! 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, interloper said:

I'm really curious how the infield thing shakes out by opening day. 

By all accounts, Urias deserves to start somewhere. I just can't get behind any scenario where he's on the bench, unless he really struggles in spring training. His ABs are such a sight for sore eyes. 

Odor has a ML deal, which doesn't mean much, but he has an edge just by virtue of being on the 40-man roster. Unfortunately, he stinks and can kind of only play 2B. Maybe they make him play 3B, but that doesn't sound ideal. 

Gutierrez I really like defensively - I went back and watched some late-season highlights and he really was quite impressive. I think we are quick to forget just how refreshing he was after Franco was released. If he hits at ALL this spring, I'm giving him the 3B job without much thought. 

Mateo deserves playing time based on his pure talent, period. It would be a shame to see him relegated to the bench or DFA'd in favor of Odor.

Owings will absolutely make this team as a super utility. The fact that he can play the OF is a nice bonus. Hyde wants a veteran IF on the team.

So - my vote is Urias at 2B, Mateo at SS, Gutierrez at 3B, Owings on the bench, Odor released, Jones in AAA, Martin in AAA. 

 

Why would we sign Odor to a major league contract and Owings to a minor league contract and then release Odor? Why have Odor on the bench and Owings stashed in the minors? It is highly likely that Mateo and Gutierrez don't work out as hoped and options will be needed for injuries in any case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Why would we sign Odor to a major league contract and Owings to a minor league contract and then release Odor? Why have Odor on the bench and Owings stashed in the minors? It is highly likely that Mateo and Gutierrez don't work out as hoped and options will be needed for injuries in any case. 

I don't know. I think it's possible the O's wanted to make sure they got a guy before the lockout and you can get Odor at the league minimum. I don't think there's any guarantee Odor makes the roster, but I agree it's likely. And then later I realized there's room for both Odor and Owings, so it's a moot discussion anyway. 

I don't think Odor is better than any of these guys save Jones and maybe Gutierrez over a full season. Especially because he's not versatile position-wise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, interloper said:

I don't know. I think it's possible the O's wanted to make sure they got a guy before the lockout and you can get Odor at the league minimum. I don't think there's any guarantee Odor makes the roster, but I agree it's likely. And then later I realized there's room for both Odor and Owings, so it's a moot discussion anyway. 

I don't think Odor is better than any of these guys save Jones and maybe Gutierrez over a full season. Especially because he's not versatile position-wise. 

I’ll keep an open mind on Odor.  I didn’t want him, but let’s see how he plays.   I don’t want his major league deal to be an impediment to releasing him if there’s a better option when camp ends, but I also don’t assume that he can’t earn a spot.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, interloper said:

I don't know. I think it's possible the O's wanted to make sure they got a guy before the lockout and you can get Odor at the league minimum. I don't think there's any guarantee Odor makes the roster, but I agree it's likely. And then later I realized there's room for both Odor and Owings, so it's a moot discussion anyway. 

I don't think Odor is better than any of these guys save Jones and maybe Gutierrez over a full season. Especially because he's not versatile position-wise. 

Odor does have some upside with the bat. I really hope he doesn't take a job from Urias but I'm OK with giving him a shot to hit 30 HR again and maybe get flipped for a bullpen arm type of prospect. Definitely a weird signing but would be even weirder to release him for a guy like Owings. Correa on the other hand...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/17/2022 at 1:54 PM, wildcard said:

Maybe they keep Urias, Mateo, Gutierrez, Owings and Odor but only keep 4 outfielders.   Hays, Mullins, Santander and McKenna.    Option Stewart to AAA since Owings and Mateo can play the outfield.

Keep Odor. See if he can hit 15-20 bombs through June and flip him. Then bring up Owings or a prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My vote is to keep Owings and Odor and drop Stewart. Not really sure what Stewart actually adds to anything. 

Also, while I know it's not as sexy as homeruns, Odor is a very good defender, something that none of our other MI candidates have a proven ability to do at the major league level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, seak05 said:

My vote is to keep Owings and Odor and drop Stewart. Not really sure what Stewart actually adds to anything. 

Also, while I know it's not as sexy as homeruns, Odor is a very good defender, something that none of our other MI candidates have a proven ability to do at the major league level. 

I have to imagine that it's getting to the point where keeping Stewart is hard to justify. Obviously Diaz has a history of being injured but he's shown some decent pop in ST. I'm not sure how his OF defense is, but it's probably better than Stewart at any position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

I have to imagine that it's getting to the point where keeping Stewart is hard to justify. Obviously Diaz has a history of being injured but he's shown some decent pop in ST. I'm not sure how his OF defense is, but it's probably better than Stewart at any position.

Diaz needs to show me he can hit at AAA and stay healthy. He's hit in spring training before and then bombed in the colder Northern weather. I think it's going to be tough for Stewart to make the team. Owings and Mateo play the outfield and have more versatility.

The only thing Stewart has going for him is he's a lefty swinger with some occasional pop. Right now this offense is pretty righty heavy and it would be nice to have that left-handed power bat when they want to rest Mountcastle and/or Mancini.

Neustrom really could have made a bid with a good spring and Stowers needs more time in AAA. If Diaz was a lefty swinger he'd be interesting, but I think he goes back down. 

That means it's could come down to Odor and Stewart for the left power bench bat.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Diaz needs to show me he can hit at AAA and stay healthy. He's hit in spring training before and then bombed in the colder Northern weather. I think it's going to be tough for Stewart to make the team. Owings and Mateo play the outfield and have more versatility.

The only thing Stewart has going for him is he's a lefty swinger with some occasional pop. Right now this offense is pretty righty heavy and it would be nice to have that left-handed power bat when they want to rest Mountcastle and/or Mancini.

Neustrom really could have made a bid with a good spring and Stowers needs more time in AAA. If Diaz was a lefty swinger he'd be interesting, but I think he goes back down. 

That means it's could come down to Odor and Stewart for the left power bench bat.

 

If Diaz keeps hitting,  I think I would rather have a right hander that hits vs the choice between two lefties that don't.  Stewart and Diaz both have options so if it does not work out the O's can make a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, wildcard said:

If Diaz keeps hitting,  I think I would rather have a right hander that hits vs the choice between two lefties that don't.  Stewart and Diaz both have options so if it does not work out the O's can make a change.

Diaz needs to show he can hit AAA pitching and in the cold before making a team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...