Jump to content

Sonnastine off the market?


CaptainRedbeard

Recommended Posts

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8922020/Wednesday-MLB-winter-meetings-blog

Didn't see this anywhere, but Edwin Jackson is close to being shipped to the Tigers for Matt Joyce, meaning Sonnastine is probably off the market. Can't see a Sonny/Scott,Reimold deal working now.

Not to be a downer in a really optomistic Tex time, but this takes away one of the last clearly available trade pieces to upgrade the starting pitching, and FA doesn't look too hot either. Burnett has been offered 91 mil from the Yanks :eektf:, and he's reportedly down to choosing between the MFY and the Braves. So right now it's down to:

Kawakami, Uehara (looks good for us getting 1 or 2)

Marquis (who knows what's going on here)

Garland, Looper, Byrd (we've shown interest in them, but seem too pricy/ bad at pitching :laughlol:)

Sheets, Wolf, Moyer (don't seem likely, since we haven't said anything about them. Also, they might get priced out of our range as well)

So, what's left there for trading? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8922020/Wednesday-MLB-winter-meetings-blog

Didn't see this anywhere, but Edwin Jackson is close to being shipped to the Tigers for Matt Joyce, meaning Sonnastine is probably off the market. Can't see a Sonny/Scott,Reimold deal working now.

Not to be a downer in a really optomistic Tex time, but this takes away one of the last clearly available trade pieces to upgrade the starting pitching, and FA doesn't look too hot either. Burnett has been offered 91 mil from the Yanks :eektf:, and he's reportedly down to choosing between the MFY and the Braves. So right now it's down to:

Kawakami, Uehara (looks good for us getting 1 or 2)

Marquis (who knows what's going on here)

Garland, Looper, Byrd (we've shown interest in them, but seem too pricy/ bad at pitching :laughlol:)

Sheets, Wolf, Moyer (don't seem likely, since we haven't said anything about them. Also, they might get priced out of our range as well)

So, what's left there for trading? :confused:

I think we land Kawakami and Uehera. Our pitching should be much better come opening day 2010.

Matusz

Guthrie

Tillman

Arrieta

Uehera

Sign me up for a much better rotation at a fraction of the cost. That rotation costs us about $13 Million verus one year of Burnett at $18.5 Million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sonnanstine wasn't all that great of a target. He put up some good numbers, but I'm not so sure how likely he is to repeat those. He'll probably have some success in huge Tiger Stadium though.

Sonnastine is still on the Rays, and Edwin Jackson is going to the Tigers. It's just less likely now that the Rays would be willing to trade him since they've opened up a spot for Price.

Sonnastine is relevant because he was one of the few surplus starting pitchers that could have been had in a trade. Not many teams have depth like the Rays have at starting pitching and are willing to trade from it. Not saying it was likely, but he was an OH favorite for some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Yeah, but the Rangers had one of the best performing lineups in baseball throughout the playoffs. The Orioles consistently go MIA on offense. Very Inconsistent. If you have a subpar bullpen, you need an offense that can score enough to bail them out. (And vica versa).
    • Tarrasco definitely thought he was catching it, you can tell by his reaction.
    • Not sure about that.  The ball is coming almost straight down at that point.   Tarascó doesn’t even think he has to jump to catch it.
    • Of course the outcome of the play should matter, and in both the videos you linked, the outcome was affected.  And a facemask call is not comparable, since that rule exists due to player safety.
    • Reminds me of one of my son's games when he was 12.  The other team had bases loaded with 1 out and the next batter hit a pretty routine pop up.  The umpires invoked the infield fly rule.  Of course, our Shortstop dropped the pop up (as 12 year olds sometimes do)...   Some of the baserunners thought they then had to try to advance and started running.  One of the runners thought it was a dead ball and he should walk back to the bag. There were runners running in all different directions, some forwards, some backwards... Then the infielders started throwing the ball away during the ensuing rundowns...   I think they managed to finally get a guy out at home ending that inning...   It was sheer pandemonium.  The umpires were laughing...
    • No way Tarrasco was getting that ball.  But I do think it might have hit the top of the fence for an extra-base hit and not an HR...
    • Are you looking for an infield fly runner's interference?  Because as far as I know, it's been 12 years since this exact situation was called.  This is the play that caused the rule to be changed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJu3RL8CV_8   They let the runner bat again and called the 1st base runner out in this case, and then in the offseason clarified the rule to say that both the runner and the batter are out.  But in this case the runner's interference was fairly substantial direct contact.   If you're talking about runners interference in general, on this play Kieboom didn't touch the runner and it was called runner's interference.   https://www.mlb.com/video/yadier-molina-grounds-into-a-force-out-fielded-by-shortstop-carter-kieboom-marcell-ozuna-out-at-3rd-jose-martinez-to-2nd-yadier-molina-to-1st?q=5%2F1%2F2019 stl vs was&cp=CMS_FIRST&qt=FREETEXT&p=3   The outcome of the play shouldn't really matter.  If you commit a face mask in football, and the guy whose face mask you grabbed gets a sack-fumble and recovers, you still get the ball and you get 15 yards.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...