Jump to content

The 28-man roster will be as follows IMO :)


interloper

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, interloper said:

Nope, didn't forget. Optioned to AAA. He hasn't pitched there yet and we know how Mike rolls. [EDIT: Woops, that's incorrect...]

I think Bautista will "check some boxes" as Mike likes to say, and be up pretty quickly. But he'll want him to ease into the season at AAA and go with pitchers who are more multi-inning types to start the season since guys aren't built all the way up. 

I hope I'm wrong!

They pitched him in the 4th inning today even though it was the travel team for the Rays. I don't see how they send him down the way he's thrown the ball. He's 26-years old. I think he's in the pen for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 Mullins

4 Urias

0 Mancini

3 Mountcastle

7 Hays

9 Santander

6 Mateo

5 Gutierrez

2 Chirinos

BN: Stewart, McKenna, Bemboom, Odor

Rotation: Means, Lyles, Zim, Akin, TWells

Long Relievers: Lopez, Lowther, Kremer, Baumann

Short Relievers: Sulser, Bautista, Fry, Scott, Perez, Tate

DFA: Mattson (or 60 day IL)

Optioned/Reassigned: Everyone else

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 Mullins

4 Urias

0 Mancini

3 Mountcastle

7 Hays

9 Santander

6 Mateo

5 Gutierrez

2 Chirinos

BN: Stewart, McKenna, Bemboom, Owings

Rotation: Means, Lyles, Zim,  TWells, Lowther

Long Relievers: Lopez, Kremer, (Baumann or Akin in a battle)

Short Relievers: Sulser, Bautista, Fry, Scott, Perez, Tate,  Baker

IL: Mattson (or 60 day IL)

DFA:  Odor, (Bannon if Mattson on the 15 day IL)

O's are only on the hook for Odor 700K if no other team adds him to their ML roster.

Bannon is well down the depth chart and does not fit the short or long  term plan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

8 Mullins

4 Urias

0 Mancini

3 Mountcastle

7 Hays

9 Santander

6 Mateo

5 Gutierrez

2 Chirinos

BN: Stewart, McKenna, Bemboom, Owings

Rotation: Means, Lyles, Zim,  TWells, (Kremer according to reports)

Long Relievers: Lopez, Lowther, (Baumann or Akin in a battle)

Short Relievers: Sulser, Bautista, Fry, Scott, Perez, Tate,  Baker

IL: Mattson (or 60 day IL)

DFA:  Odor, (Bannon if Mattson on the 15 day IL)

O's are only on the hook for Odor 700K if no other team adds him to their ML roster.

Bannon is well down the depth chart and does not fit the short or long  term plan. 

I think this is quite likely to be correct. I agree that Bannon is a guy that could be cut off the 40-man. I also doubt he'd be grabbed given how poor his 2021 was (save for that couple weeks of bombs). I still want to see if he can find something in AAA (similar to my thoughts on Diaz). This offseason I was ready to write both off. Now, I'd like to see both get one last go at AAA to earn a promotion, but for Bannon that could happen on or off the 40-man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly think Ramon Urias could be the starting 2nd baseman on our next playoff team. 

One of the biggest things I'm rooting for this season (besides the obvious Adley/Grayson stuff), is that he continues to establish himself as a legitimate high-OBP everyday MLB player. I think he can do that. His first year of free agency is 2027.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

They pitched him in the 4th inning today even though it was the travel team for the Rays. I don't see how they send him down the way he's thrown the ball. He's 26-years old. I think he's in the pen for sure.

Yeah now that I realize he pitched in AAA, I definitely agree he'll be on the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

I honestly think Ramon Urias could be the starting 2nd baseman on our next playoff team. 

One of the biggest things I'm rooting for this season (besides the obvious Adley/Grayson stuff), is that he continues to establish himself as a legitimate high-OBP everyday MLB player. I think he can do that. His first year of free agency is 2027.

It's possible. I would love to see him basically replicate his numbers from last year over the course of a full season. I'm not sure there's any additional upside to that given he's about to turn 28, but a 111 OPS+ second baseman certainly has value. I really hope we see Urias and Mateo basically everyday (at least for the first few months). Of the infield options, they are the ones that have a chance to be something beyond just spot holders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Pushmonkey said:

I am over Akin and Kremer being on an major league roster. 

Couldn't agree more.  Not that they can't re-establish themselves as options in the future, but based on what they did in the majors last season they are hardly entitled to a spot on the team, much less the starting rotation.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...