Jump to content

Where to spend a bunch of money on Free Agents this fall?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Just looking at what the O's will have next spring to pick from and looking at holes.

Infield:  1B Mountcastle, Nevin, Mundy

2B/SS /3B:  Henderson, Westburg, Ortiz, Urias, Mateo, Gutierrez, Vavra, Jones, Martin

Outfield: Mullins, Hays, Stowers, Santander, Diaz, Cowser

Catcher:  Adley

Starters:  Grayson, DL, Means, Bradish,  T Wells

Starters Depth: Zimmerman, Kremer, Lowther, Akin, Baumann, Rom

Relievers:  Bautista, Baker, Tate, Sulser, Scott, Perez, Fry, Krehbiel, Lopez

So where are the holes you want to spend a bunch  of money on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think 3B/middle infield is still an option. Don't think Henderson will be quite ready in 2023. Westburg it remains to be seen, for me, how much he really hits.  Same with Ortiz. There's room to supplement here and trade from depth. 

It would be nice to find a tried and tested SP. Even though that group is nice, injuries are extremely likely. 

The bullpen could use a true backend piece as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like where your head's at though and in theory the team certainly has a lot of talent at most positions going into next year. It's just very, very, very, very unlikely that all these guys, much less most of them, much less half of them, end up the guys we hope they will be. Right? To hit on a homegrown MLB-caliber starter for all of these positions is basically impossible. 

But we'll hit on a few, and we'll trade from depth, and we'll fill in the gaps with free agents. That's the hope anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, interloper said:

I think 3B/middle infield is still an option. Don't think Henderson will be quite ready in 2023. Westburg it remains to be seen, for me, how much he really hits.  Same with Ortiz. There's room to supplement here and trade from depth. 

It would be nice to find a tried and tested SP. Even though that group is nice, injuries are extremely likely. 

The bullpen could use a true backend piece as well. 

Spending a bunch of money means a multi year contract.   Do you want to block the infielders before you see how good they are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

Spending a bunch of money means a multi year contract.   Do you want to block the infielders before you see how good they are?

It depends. What holes reveal themselves in the course of this season? To me, there's surely no way all those SPs hit, so we're going to need to acquire a SP through trade, because free agent SPs don't come here. So you trade for a SP with middle infield depth, and you sign some middle infielders. That's one option anyway. 

There's much to be revealed this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

I like where your head's at though and in theory the team certainly has a lot of talent at most positions going into next year. It's just very, very, very, very unlikely that all these guys, much less most of them, much less half of them, end up the guys we hope they will be. Right? To hit on a homegrown MLB-caliber starter for all of these positions is basically impossible. 

But we'll hit on a few, and we'll trade from depth, and we'll fill in the gaps with free agents. That's the hope anyway. 

Most teams don't tank for 4 years and draft in the top 5 pick all that time.  Plus having two #1 starters that are developed from before the tanking.    This is a little different  situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, interloper said:

It depends. What holes reveal themselves in the course of this season? To me, there's surely no way all those SPs hit, so we're going to need to acquire a SP through trade, because free agent SPs don't come here. So you trade for a SP with middle infield depth, and you sign some middle infielders. That's one option anyway. 

There's much to be revealed this season. 

I don't think the pitchers won't come here for a long term contract holds next fall.   The moving back of the wall and a up and coming team may make FA starters in play for the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I don't think the pitchers won't come here for a long term contract holds next fall.   The moving back of the wall and a up and coming team may make FA starters in play for the O's.

I agree next year is too soon for a big FA SP. But they could definitely do better than Lyles next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the pipeline, you could see most of the holes being filled from within if the upside case for every guy pans out. However, it probably isn't going to happen that way and it's hard to say in advance which guys will work out and which won't.

I think an elite bullpen arm (closer or 8th inning guy) will almost certainly be worth the upgrade. 

I feel least confident in Westburg/Gunnar. Going after Correa may be an option. 

Depending on how the young pitchers are doing, I could also see spending big on an Ace. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Depending on how the young pitchers are doing, I could also see spending big on an Ace. 

This is the one spot (along with elite bullpen guy) that has almost 0% risk of blocking anyone. As others have said, for the position players not everyone is going to be a stud, but it's hard to predict where the holes will be and I'd rather not block a potential young star without a chance to find out. If we go out and sign a TOR pitcher, it fills a need even if all of the young guys work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Another way to look at this question is this…who do you feel is basically a guarantee to be on the 2023 team?

I think that number is quite small.

With potential trades and with some prospects needing this year to prove their worth, this is all I can really think of

 

C - Rutchman

1B - Mountcastle

2B - ?

SS - ?

3B - ?

OF - ?, ?, ?

DH - ?

SP - G Rodriguez, ?, ?, ?, ?

RP - Wells, Bautista, ?????

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...