Jump to content

Come so far but still a long way to go


vab

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

It's been a great season for growth so far and we're on schedule with the rebuild. Add at SP and BP and then call it an offseason. We'll see where Holliday is come start of next year and see if he gets fast tracked, and for god's sake put Henderson at 3B. Outside of that I like how everything is coming up. We'll be actually competing for a playoff spot next year and a WS in 2024 barring actual disaster. 

Holliday will not be fast tracked he is still just 18 the earliest we see him is 2025.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jagwar said:

My point is that this team needs more than just a balanced lineup with a majority of 700-800 OPS batters 

I’d like to know why.  League average OPS is .704.   I’d say a team with a balanced lineup with a majority of .700-.800 OPS  hitters would be pretty effective.   However, the guys who are not in that category can’t be terrible.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’d like to know why.  League average OPS is .704.   I’d say a team with a balanced lineup with a majority of .700-.800 OPS  hitters would be pretty effective.   However, the guys who are not in that category can’t be terrible.  

I guess I just want the team to score more runs and have a higher run differential. Doesn't that win more games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

I guess I just want the team to score more runs and have a higher run differential. Doesn't that win more games?

If you're saying that you want to take a balanced lineup with nine guys who all have .700-.800 OPSes, and remove several of them and replace them with .850 and .950 OPS hitters, sure.  Who wouldn't do that?

But I think Frobby's point was that a team with an OPS of .750 will score about the same number of runs no matter the distribution of individual players.  A team with a shortstop with a 1.000 OPS and a 2B with a .500 will score about as many runs as a team with a SS/2B who each OPS .750.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2022 at 6:57 PM, Jagwar said:

The O's have no big bat that other teams fear. They have no ace. When is the last time a playoff team had no one in the lineup OPSing above 800?

This is an encouraging year for many reasons. The team has turned a corner IMO, at least the first corner towards competitiveness.  I'm most optimistic about the position prospects in the minors. Can't wait to see GRod and Hall, but we need much more pitching before we are a playoff team.

I agree with this, but...as the Orioles have progressed this season...their OPS collectively and individually have risen.  IF the Orioles were to somehow scrape into the playoffs, I have no doubt that by the end of the season they would have at least one bat would be OPSing above .800.

I do not believe the Orioles will land in the playoffs, but I am willing to believe that they have at least one player strong enough down the stretch to OPS .800.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...