Jump to content

Are the Orioles done?


interloper

Are the Orioles done?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Are the Orioles done?

    • Yep - no more 40-man roster additions. They're rolling with who they have now.
    • Basically - maybe an O'Hearn type or two, but nothing serious.
    • Nah - I still think they'll sign a Wacha/Cueto/Greinke type starting pitcher.
    • Nah - big trade incoming that will reshape this off-season.

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Twenty people believe there’s a trade before the season that changed the offseason?

Hmm

I said it when Elias was hired. Nothing of any significance will change until there’s new ownership. 

Actually, I questioned his ability to perform his duties with the current ownership. I’m still waiting for an impact signing. However, I think they may have a chance with the young guys. Of course, that assumes a big season from Adley, Gunnar and GrayRod and it’s likely at least one of that group has growing pains. 
 

I also hope Hall gets a real shot as a SP. Too many people didn’t recognize the strides he made in season and he’s always been a starter. His stint in the pen was useful, but that kid has electric stuff. 

Don’t get me wrong, Elias has been ok, but how much could he do if they loosened the purse strings? Yes, I know, the Frazier signing, but how bout that Gibson guy!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Il BuonO said:

Twenty people believe there’s a trade before the season that changed the offseason?

Hmm

Nice to see you drop by.  That poll is 5 weeks old, and before the Irvin trade.  I doubt many people are expecting a trade that significantly changes the offseason now.  I’m not implying that the Irvin trade was that significant, just that the trade made another, more significant trade for pitching less likely (plus it’s much later in the offseason now).   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Nice to see you drop by.  That poll is 5 weeks old, and before the Irvin trade.  I doubt many people are expecting a trade that significantly changes the offseason now.  I’m not implying that the Irvin trade was that significant, just that the trade made another, more significant trade for pitching less likely (plus it’s much later in the offseason now).   

If Irvin gets 20+ starts (and it looks like he will) the trade will have been significant, like it or not.  Might not be a big FA signing like we were all hoping for but it'll have had a significant impact on this team for this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too much out there in the remaining FA. 4th bench options to compete with Vavra could be an a option. The best fits look like Peralta, Dickerson, and Bradley, if we wanted to go the LH OF bat option. Profar is still out there. Sano, Voit, Gurriel, are out there too, if we wanted to go the 1B/DH option, but they are RH. 
 

I imagine the waiver wire won’t have as good quality since it seems like every team has a guy or two to put on the 60 day IL. 
 

I expect to see some movement on the remaining bats and RPs after 2/15. Profar still could be an option for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

Nice to see you drop by.  That poll is 5 weeks old, and before the Irvin trade.  I doubt many people are expecting a trade that significantly changes the offseason now.  I’m not implying that the Irvin trade was that significant, just that the trade made another, more significant trade for pitching less likely (plus it’s much later in the offseason now).   

Thanks….wonder who is affected most by that trade. Will Irvin and Gibson be traded if the young guys are doing well and the team is competitive? I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does 60-day IL reactivate next week the very first day camps open?

By this point as tight a ship as Elias runs and as precious as he is about roster spots, if he has one more transaction buying Talent for $$$ I don't rule out that its already a tacit agreement with Profar, Wacha, Moore/Chafin, whoever, and he simply doesn't want to DFA someone because he doesn't have to.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Profar fits more than it seems until you take a deeper dive. 
 

1. He’s a 29 yo SH that showed really good OBP skills last year. His LH power should play up in OPACY. 
 

2. He kicks Santander to permanent DH. That’s the best way to maximize Santander’s bat and health. Also, overall team defense. 
 

3. We don’t have to rush Cowser, or a Westburg/Norby OF conversion. 
 

4. That frees up Cowser to be traded for a TOR SP at the deadline, with Profar helping to bridge the gap to Kjerstad, Mayo, Beavers, and Fabian. 
 

5. We aren’t forced to roll with not ideal fits. Like Vavra, or signing RH FA like Sano/Voit. And having to play Santander in RF. 
 

There’s really no such thing as a “bad” one year deal. If we need to go for two to sign him, with option possibilities, then it gets tricky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 0 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • Need to give this group more of a listen.
    • Thanks @btdart20 I am humbled that you feel that way.  Thanks for reading my work.
    • I don't think it's anything close to 90%.  As of June the brand recognition of the cereal was under 90%. If you have two pretty similar nicknames isn't it just common sense to go with the one that isn't the street name of a drug? And for the record all I was doing was giving a personal preference.  I never said anyone couldn't do whatever the heck they wanted.
    • This is the story, or part of the story, of the last two Orioles' seasons: trying to balance winning games and reaching the postseason (and, last year and and for a long time this year, a division title) with building for the future. However you balance those two, there is a risk of harming the team. The way the Orioles have been and are being built, relying on a bunch of young position players to blossom at around the same time, enhanced that risk. Sometimes these two objectives line up pretty well, after weakening the team for a short time, as they did with Westburg, Henderson and Rutschman, and to a lesser degree Cowser. Sometimes the objectives don't fit together very well, as has been the case with Holliday and Mayo. The possibility of that misfit was, and is, inherent in the way this team was built. Maybe the harm to the team's overall performance from playing the young guys could have been reduced by better coaching or more effective communication with the coaches, but there was really no way for this team to avoid the problem.
    • He's always looked calm and capable in his mlb at-bats. Let's the ball come to him, as they say. Am optimistic.
    • Position Players: 2023: 105 wRC+, 16.0 BsR, 54.9 Off, -26.3 Def, 23.8 WAR   2024: 113 wRC+, 1.2 BsR, 90.8 Off, -26.1 Def, 27.0 WAR   The 2023 batters had a clutch score of 8.39. That number is -1.35 this season. The 2023 batters had an xwOBA of .319 (15th). That number is .328 this season (6th). The RISP was also much better last year (as we all know). Not only did they hit for a much higher average (.287 versus .246 this year), but their ISO with RISP jumped up to .195 (it was .166 in all situations).    The defense is about as valuable as last year even though they seem much less reliable. Gunnar has been more valuable defensively according to Fangraphs, the catchers have been worse, Westburg and Mullins have been slightly worse, but Frazier was awful last year at 2B (as was Hicks in the OF) and removing him while adding an elite defender in Cowser puts them about even to last year. The base running is nowhere near as good.   The pitching is slightly worse than last year (18.3 WAR and 3.91 ERA last year, 16.5 WAR and 3.93 ERA this year) but they’ve also had a ton of innings soaked up (mostly due to injuries) by guys that aren’t going to pitch for them in the playoffs. Last year, the below group threw 259 innings and gave up 159 ER’s (5.53 ERA):   Vespi, Irvin, Zimmerman, Fuji, Voth, Lopez, Gillaspie, Flaherty, Akin, Garrett, Givens, Bazardo, McKenna   This year, from they have gotten 366.1 IP from the below group, while giving up 229 ER’s (5.63 ERA):   Vieira, McCann, Krook, Heasley, Rogers, McDermott, Ramirez. Wells, Smith, Povich, Kimbrel, Irvin, Tate, Baker    That means that the rest of the pitching staff in 2023 (besides the above group) threw 1194.2 IP, giving up 472 ER for a 3.55 ERA. In 2024 besides the above group, the rest of the staff has combined for 1022.2 IP, giving up 378 ER for a 3.33 ERA. The 2023 pitching staff had a 6.03 clutch score and a 73.5 LOB%. In 2024, those numbers are -0.93 and 71.4 %. The 2023 pitchers had an xwOBA of .317 (15th). That number is .310 this season (T-9th).    In the offseason, a lot of people were saying this team might be better than last year but finish with a worse record. As frustrating as the last 3 months have been, you could easily make that case. The offense has been better overall, but much worse with RISP and less clutch. The core pitching group has arguably been as good as last year’s, they just had a lot more injuries and innings thrown by fringe guys that won’t be pitching in the playoffs. FWIW, Texas was one of the least clutch teams in the regular season last year and then were unsurprisingly the most clutch team in the playoffs. The Orioles followed up their extremely clutch regular season by being the 2nd least clutch pitching team (only PHI was worse and they played an extra 2 series) and 3rd least clutch batting team (only PHI and MIN were worse - MIN played an extra series as well).    So TLDR. They have arguably been a better team than last year that has dealt with many more injuries, had a lot more PA’s and IP’s from worse players due to those injuries, and have been extremely unclutch. Some of that might be luck, some of it might be skill, but it could change at any time. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...