Jump to content

2023 Lineup Guesses


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

+1 to both, these guys are not platoon players. McKenna will probably get a few starts against RHP to rest Cedric but not on a regular basis. Adley will rest day games after night games whether the pitcher is RH or LH, but should start 150+ games at C or DH. 

RHP: Cedric CF, Adley C, Gunnar SS, Santander DH, Mountcastle 1B, Stowers RF, Hays/Vavra LF, Urias 3B, Frazier 2B 

LHP: Cedric CF, Adley C, Mountcastle 1B, Santander DH, Gunnar 3B, Hays LF, Urias 2B, Stowers RF, Mateo SS

Adley DH vs RHP: Cedric CF, Adley DH, Gunnar SS, Santander RF, Mountcastle 1B, Hays/Vavra LF, Urias 3B, Frazier 2B, McAnn C

Adley DH vs LHP: Cedric CF, Adley DH, Mountcastle 1B, Santander RF, Gunnar 3B, Hays LF, Urias 2B, McAnn C, Mateo SS

I just feel like Mateo on the bench against all righties is a waste, especially defensively.  This is yet another reason why signing Frazier made no sense, and why trading one of Mateo/Urias does make sense.

Nothing wrong with your post though, I agree with all of this if that is the team we have going in (though I think it is McCann, not McAnn :) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For laughs, I went back to look at the 1969 Orioles, who as I recalled, had an extremely fixed lineup:

1st Buford 139 starts in that spot

2nd Blair 130

3rd F. Robinson 141

4th Powell 141

5th B Robinson 125

8th Belanger 100

Only the 6th and 7th spots were something of a mystery.   Even there, Davey Johnson started just over half the games (82) in the 6th spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

It is my hope that if Adam Frazier's OBP is what it was last year in Seattle, they don't keep trying him at the top of the order in hopes that he regains his 2018 skills.

It is my hope that Frazier’s OBP won’t be what it was last year, but much closer to his career norm.  But even then, I’d probably prefer to have him low in the order.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't really expect any of these to get all 1-9 but I like the exercise to see some full lineups and think through the options, different roles for guys, and next guy up. 

I hear you.  I just think it’s going to be a dazzling array of different lineups.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RZNJ said:

CF Mullins

2B Frazier

C Rutshman

DH Santander

3B Henderson

1B Mountcastle 

RF Stowers

LF Hays

SS Mateo

Urias plays super sub if he's here.

Have you noticed that Santander has a career 704 OPS as a DH and a 642 OPS as a DH last year.   The O's are going to need Santander to hit so he may be playing the OF to make that happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Have you noticed that Santander has a career 704 OPS as a DH and a 642 OPS as a DH last year.   The O's are going to need Santander to hit so he may be playing the OF to make that happen.

Have you noticed that he's a below average defender in RF and if Stowers can play an average RF and hit then it might be better to have Santander DH and try to do better than a .704 OPS?    Just saying!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Have you noticed that he's a below average defender in RF and if Stowers can play an average RF and hit then it might be better to have Santander DH and try to do better than a .704 OPS?    Just saying!

I would rather think that Santander plays an average RF (.5 UZR) and Stowers plays an above average RF (2 UZR).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I would rather think that Santander plays an average RF (.5 UZR) and Stowers plays an above average RF (2 UZR).

It’s interesting to note that Santander played much better in RF than LF last year, according to the various metrics.  I’ll have to look, but I think almost all his LF starts were on the road.  (Edit: I’m correct.  34 of 38 games in LF were on the road.  59 of 84 in RF were at home.)

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s interesting to note that Santander played much better in RF than LF last year, according to the various metrics.  I’ll have to look, but I think almost all his LF starts were on the road.

Yes, I agree but the O's scored 674 runs last year.   If they are going to make the playoffs they need to do better.    Gunnar will help but Santander is worse than Mancini at DH.  If they need to play Santander in the OF to score more runs they may have to consider that.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Yes, I agree but the O's scored 674 runs last year.   If they are going to make the playoffs they need to do better.    Gunnar will help but Santander is worse than Mancini at DH.  If they need to play Santander in the OF to score more runs they may have to consider that.

I do think some players have trouble hitting as DH, but I don’t know if I’d draw that conclusion about Santander based on his limited time as a DH (62 games in his career).   Could just be a small sample size fluke.   But I’m not saying that for sure.  

Anyway, all I was doing was pointing out that Santander was better in RF than LF defensively last year, and that his LF games were almost exclusively on the road.  I wasn’t making an argument about him being a DH.  There’s a lot that goes into that decision, and in any event it won’t be an all or nothing thing.  He’ll play the field some and DH some, I expect.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/12/2023 at 7:59 PM, ThisIsBirdland said:

Any early guesses as to how Hyde will typically fill out the lineup card this year? My first stab at it:

Vs RHP:

CF Cedric Mullins (L)

C Adley Rutschman (S)

3B Gunnar Henderson (L)

DH Anthony Santander (S)

1B Ryan Mountcastle (R)

2B Adam Frazier (L)

LF Austin Hays (R)

RF Kyle Stowers (L)

SS Jorge Mateo (R)

Bench: McCann (R), Urias (R), McKenna (R), Vavra (L)

Vs LHP

CF Austin Hays (R)

DH Adley Rutschman (S)

RF Anthony Santander (S)

1B Ryan Mountcastle (R)

SS Gunnar Henderson (L)

C James McCann (R)

2B Adam Frazier (L)

3B Ramon Urias (R)

RF Kyle Stowers (L)

Bench: Mullins (L), Mateo (R), McKenna (R), Vavra (L) 

McKenna had a 794 OPS vs lefties last season.   He probably starts in center vs lefties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I do think some players have trouble hitting as DH, but I don’t know if I’d draw that conclusion about Santander based on his limited time as a DH (62 games in his career).   Could just be a small sample size fluke.   But I’m not saying that for sure.  

Anyway, all I was doing was pointing out that Santander was better in RF than LF defensively last year, and that his LF games were almost exclusively on the road.  I wasn’t making an argument about him being a DH.  There’s a lot that goes into that decision, and in any event it won’t be an all or nothing thing.  He’ll play the field some and DH some, I expect.  
 

252 PA is close to half a season at DH in his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think half of Fangraphs’ staff over the years came from Lookout Landing.   I rarely read other teams’ sites, but I agree Pinstripe Alley is one of the best Yankee sites.     
    • For one thing, they don’t have Bautista shutting things down in the 9th inning or extra innings.   Second, 30-16 just doesn’t happen every year.  I’m actually pretty encouraged that the O’s have played .650 baseball without winning a disproportionate number of close games.    
    • Four more shutout innings for Chace last night, 2 hits, 3 walks, 6 strikeouts.   His ERA is 0.91, WHiP 1.21, K/9 12.7.   The only blemish is his 5.2 BB/9.   He’s pitched 8 games and has only allowed runs in two of them.   Yesterday he threw 45 of 68 pitches for strikes.  For some reason the O’s kind of have him under wraps, as he’s only been allowed to exceed 70 pitches twice, back in April.  He’s also been kept to four inning outings.  They’re clearly being very careful with the 20-year old (turns 21 in three weeks).  In fairness, they did need to shut him down for a month late last summer, so I’m guessing it’s more season load management than game-by-game decisions.   In any event, it’s been a promising campaign for Chace.    
    • I mean, I don't want to denigrate your experience, but I think you're underestimating the power potential of elite athletes.  The leg strength required to send a grown man 20 mph from a dead stop is the same leg strength required to do a deadlift, or do a squat.  Can your buddy run a 4.5 40?
    • The Orioles were 30-16 in one-run games in 2023. They are 6-6 this year so far. Orioles magic hasn’t been there this year, at least so far. What changed?
    • I can’t even believe the grasping of straws going on here.  Why don’t we just bring up every guy at Norfolk who has an .800+ OPS, since they’re obviously better than their major league counterparts?  Oh wait, everyone at Norfolk has an .800+ OPS! As to Mullins, yes he’s looked awful at the plate for a month, but the O’s are nowhere near the point of regularly benching him or pinch hitting for him in key situations vs. RHP.   You know why?   Because even good players have slumps, and the best way to get them out of it is to keep playing them until they emerge from them.  And Mullins has a long enough track record where the odds of him coming out of this eventually are decent.  Not 100%, but a lot more likely than not.  I mean, the guy had an .859 OPS the first 3 weeks of the season.  That guy didn’t have some instantaneous physical decline that has turned him into the second coming of Chris Davis permanently.  I know it’s frustrating to watch him right now.  I’m as frustrated as anyone.   But every major league team would be doing what the Orioles have been doing, for another 4-6 weeks at a minimum.  
    • But it doesn't really matter if correlation implies causation, because we can at least infer that people with fast 40 times have a good chance of being able to squat 2.5x their body weight, regardless of whether there is a causative relationship.  And we have verifiable data thay many football players at skill positions are able to squat large amounts of weight that would be out of reach of many other people even given the same amount of training and diet.  So with both if these things in hand we can safely assume that these lifting numbers are achievable for most elite athletes, which Holliday qualifies as.  So I don't think we should be shocked or skeptical that he's able to pull these numbers.    I'd also be shocked if there wasn't a causative relationship between 40 times and lifting heavy.  Lifting large amounts of weight requires powerful muscles in the legs.  Running really fast also requires powerful muscles in the legs.  You can get in the weeds about muscle fiber type but to me if you're good at one, there's a great chance thay you're at least moderately good at the other.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...