Jump to content

40 man roster looks stacked


wildcard

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

These are problems we’ve been anticipating for a few years. Beginning to feel the constraints of the 40 man roster speaks to the talent improvement we’ve seen already and will only intensify. Great problems to have. 
 

Vavra could get squeezed, but in the form of a trade. Sure he’s not a defensive whiz, but he brings versatility and the potential to be a really good hitter with high OBP. It’s widely assumed that at some point we’re going to put together a package of young players/prospects who get us an established plus starter. It’s easy to see him included in such a deal.  Or a trade for a high ceiling low level prospect. I’d be shocked to see him DFA’d. 

Vavra has to demonstrate that he has value for a team to want to trade for him. He’s the type of guy most organizations have.  But if he can hit for more power and show better defense, he can be a real asset.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Vavra has embraced the utility role.   If he can put up a good OBP in that role he can stay in the majors a long time.  He has an over 400 OBP in the minors.  He is not someone that gets DFA.   If Cowser, Westburg or Ortiz take his place he can be traded not DFA'd.   He has 2 options left.

Yes, IF he can have that OBp he will be fine.

But if he doesn’t start to show more power, teams will challenge him and his OBP will drop big time.

I like the idea of what he could be but the poor defense at second and the lack of power are real concerns. Without improving in those areas, he’s not a MLer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Yes, IF he can have that OBp he will be fine.

But if he doesn’t start to show more power, teams will challenge him and his OBP will drop big time.

I like the idea of what he could be but the poor defense at second and the lack of power are real concerns. Without improving in those areas, he’s not a MLer.

He doesn't have to hit homers.  He had 14 doubles in 173  AB in AAA last season.   That's 40 doubles in 500 AB.   That's plenty of extra bases if he can bring that to the majors.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, wildcard said:

He doesn't have to hit homers.  He had 14 doubles in 173  AB in AAA last season.   That's 40 doubles in 500 AB.   That's plenty of extra bases if he can bring that to the majors.

Agreed. I didn’t say he has to hit homers. Power isn’t just homers.

If he can be a doubles machine, that will be good enough.  IF. He has to show it. If he doesn’t, he’s a DFA guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Krehbiel's velocity was down and the way he ended last year, he could be a guy who could go if they needed space. Cano has a good arm, as does Gillaspie, but both are probably bubble roster guys as well. 

But the point is valid, the 40-man roster has more talent than it has had in the recent past for sure. Is it stacked? That's a matter of your definition of stacked. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Vavra has to demonstrate that he has value for a team to want to trade for him. He’s the type of guy most organizations have.  But if he can hit for more power and show better defense, he can be a real asset.

Since I first saw him work pitchers/at-bats in AA I've always had a liking for him. It's a talent that will translate and serve him well in the majors. I remember having a similar appreciation for minor league Brian Roberts (I know, not the same player...just the contact tool). I've also been highly aware that with the talent infusion and tough decisions that lurk in our future, we're going to have some guys who get away and become really good for other organizations. It's inevitable. Vavra feels like he could end up one of those guys to me. 89 ML at bats and he's still 25.....I still think of him more as a prospect than as a utility player. I don't see how he fits in our future to be frank, but I'm a fan of his. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UMDTerrapins said:

Since I first saw him work pitchers/at-bats in AA I've always had a liking for him. It's a talent that will translate and serve him well in the majors. I remember having a similar appreciation for minor league Brian Roberts (I know, not the same player...just the contact tool). I've also been highly aware that with the talent infusion and tough decisions that lurk in our future, we're going to have some guys who get away and become really good for other organizations. It's inevitable. Vavra feels like he could end up one of those guys to me. 89 ML at bats and he's still 25.....I still think of him more as a prospect than as a utility player. I don't see how he fits in our future to be frank, but I'm a fan of his. 

Maybe if Vavra takes some vitamins "once" he could get the same doubles power explosions?  ;)

Honestly, there are some similarities to Vavra and Brob's games. Both were college SS that had to move in the pros to 2B because of a lack of arm strength. Both have good contact skills and the ability to hit lines drives all over the field. Both have coaching Dads and are smallish over achievers physically.

Now Vavra lost a year due to COVID and will most likely not get the sudden power jump that Brob got, but they are not terribly dissimilar players. 

 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Maybe if Vavra takes some vitamins "once" he could get the same doubles power explosions?  ;)

Honestly, there are some similarities to Vavra and Brob's games. Both were college SS that had to move in the pros to 2B because of a lack of arm strength. Both have good contact skills and the ability to hit lines drives all over the field. Both have coaching Dads and are smallish over achievers physically.

Now Vavra lost a year due to COVID and will most likely not get the sudden power jump that Brob got, but they are not terribly dissimilar players. 

Good points! It's somewhat muted because of his contract and not being able to stay on the field in latter portion of his career, but I was a HUGE fan of Roberts' game. Hopefully Vavra doesn't share similarities with injuries. Not sure if his previous back injury is one of those things that is a chronic concern....don't remember. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...