Jump to content

Why is it that the Orioles have off the day after the home opener so often?


Es4M11

Recommended Posts

After a quick check, going back 10 years the Orioles have had the next day off after the home opener something like 8/10 times. And if I am remembering correctly it has been that way since at least the 90's. Is there a specific reason for this? It doesn't seem that other teams get this day off nearly as often as the Orioles, but I have not actually checked to verify this.

Just a curiosity of mine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Es4M11 said:

After a quick check, going back 10 years the Orioles have had the next day off after the home opener something like 8/10 times. And if I am remembering correctly it has been that way since at least the 90's. Is there a specific reason for this? It doesn't seem that other teams get this day off nearly as often as the Orioles, but I have not actually checked to verify this.

Just a curiosity of mine

In cities that are colder and no dome or retractable roof they usually give the next day off in case if cold,rain or even snow. I think one year they did try to get most games in warmer weather and domes and retractable roofs.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Going Underground said:

In cities that are colder and no dome or retractable roof they usually give the next day off in case if cold,rain or even snow. I think one year they did try to get most games in warmer weather and domes and retractable roofs.

On it's face that makes sense, but I don't think Boston or New York get the day off after their home opener nearly as often. In recent years when the Orioles have opened in those cities they were generally all straight 3 day/game series. I'd have to actually look to be sure, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Es4M11 said:

On it's face that makes sense, but I don't think Boston or New York get the day off after their home opener nearly as often. In recent years when the Orioles have opened in those cities they were generally all straight 3 day/game series. I'd have to actually look to be sure, though.

This year both the Yankees and Red Sox both have the day off after their home openers Both also have the  day off after the Orioles and Tigers home openers. What has changed it seems is opening on a Thursday and getting Friday off. In the past it seemed most teams opened on a Monday. I remember I was at one game at Camden Yards when ESPN did the one Sunday night game opener. I think it was really cold that night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Es4M11 said:

On it's face that makes sense, but I don't think Boston or New York get the day off after their home opener nearly as often. In recent years when the Orioles have opened in those cities they were generally all straight 3 day/game series. I'd have to actually look to be sure, though.

I think you are wrong.   We open in Boston next Thursday and have next Friday off.

Everyone in MLB opens next Thursday.  And there are only 5 games scheduled next Friday:  in Miami, Houston, Seattle, San Diego, and Los Angeles   Three domes/retractable domes and two SoCal locations where rain is unlikely.   

Nearly every team that is not in a dome or southern California location gets an open day after the home opener.   It is not unique to the Orioles nor is it more prevalent wit us than with any other outdoor non-SoCal team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Going Underground said:

In cities that are colder and no dome or retractable roof they usually give the next day off in case if cold,rain or even snow. I think one year they did try to get most games in warmer weather and domes and retractable roofs.

This is the reason for sure. Its not just the Orioles, it's most non warm weather cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles have habitually won on Opening Day...at least in my lifetime.......so I thought that day off after Opening Day was to give the players time to come to the realization that they just aren't going to win many more games the rest of the year.  But, the weather factor makes sense too  🙂

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No off day in 1956 but actually played a doubleheader the first week of the season.

Tue, Apr 17 @ Red Sox L 1 - 8  
Wed, Apr 18 @ Red Sox L 4 - 8  
Thu, Apr 19 @ Red Sox L 2 - 4  
Fri, Apr 20 vs Senators W 3 - 2  
Sat, Apr 21 vs Senators L 4 - 8  
Sun, Apr 22 vs Senators W 7 - 3  
Sun, Apr 22 vs Senators L 1 - 4  
Wed, Apr 25 vs Yankees  L 2 - 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SteveA said:

I think you are wrong.   We open in Boston next Thursday and have next Friday off.

Everyone in MLB opens next Thursday.  And there are only 5 games scheduled next Friday:  in Miami, Houston, Seattle, San Diego, and Los Angeles   Three domes/retractable domes and two SoCal locations where rain is unlikely.   

Nearly every team that is not in a dome or southern California location gets an open day after the home opener.   It is not unique to the Orioles nor is it more prevalent wit us than with any other outdoor non-SoCal team.

I am in fact wrong. Went back and checked the Yankees schedule over the past 10 years. They have made use of that make up day several times in just the past 5 years alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Es4M11 said:

I am in fact wrong. Went back and checked the Yankees schedule over the past 10 years. They have made use of that make up day several times in just the past 5 years alone.

And if they didn't last year, it could be a byproduct of the lockout.   The first week of the season was postponed and the schedule picked up a week into the original schedule.   So last year the Orioles "home opener" was a Monday with Milwaukee with no off day the next day, but that was only because it was not going to be the home opener on the original schedule.   Same could be true of any team that didn't have the off day in 2022; you'd have to find a copy of the original pre-lockout schedule to see if they were supposed to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...