Jump to content

McCann activated Stowers optioned


Pat Kelly

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Right, but it's still the same OPS+.  You can call it 770 or 715 but over the last few years Hays has shown himself to be a slightly above average major league hitter.  The 715 isn't as damning as you seem to think  it is.

Right, so a 103 OPS+ last year and a 107 OPS+ in his vaunted 2021 campaign....or 3% and 7% better than the average big league hitter across two seasons.

I'm not sure that 5% average of being better than league average is worth a vigorous defense, but hey, whatever makes you happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Bemboom is temporary due to quirk in schedule with facing all these LHP. Yesterday they pinch hit for McCann and Bemboom came in. 

Doesn't matter how temporary it is, it's dumb.

But then again, since the Orioles seem to have no idea how to use that 26-man and just bury a guy there, why not I guess? So the Orioles get to have Vavra pinch hit for McCann on those rare Rutschman days off behind the plate.

Not sure how I missed this genius roster work! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Doesn't matter how temporary it is, it's dumb.

But then again, since the Orioles seem to have no idea how to use that 26-man and just bury a guy there, why not I guess? So the Orioles get to have Vavra pinch hit for McCann on those rare Rutschman days off behind the plate.

Not sure how I missed this genius roster work! 

If they aren’t playing Stowers vs LHP then I get why they are doing it. Adley went 4-4 at DH yesterday. 
 

Like I said maybe they are giving Stowers a reset here and he will be back soon. He would not have played much this week either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I think your first point is more than fair.  If they were going to just send Stowers down in a week, why even break camp with the club?  

The Bemboon thing is not as big a deal as you're making it out to be.  That will resolve itself in 3 days.

I asked that question yesterday. It’s why I am speculating this is a temporary reset for Stowers. Maybe the Bemboom instead of McCann played a slight role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

Vavra leaping ahead of Stowers is hilarious to me.

Sort of.   I mean, playing in the outfield, yeah.

But if Vavra vs. Stowers is the comp, it's clear that they're preferring guys who have a better plate approach and have positional versatility.  I'm under no illusion that Vavra is a great defender, btw.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Vavra leaping ahead of Stowers is hilarious to me.

I'm not sure why.  They have similar offensive output, one is based on power and one is based in on-base ability.  Neither is a good defender, but Vavra is certainly more versatile.  To my eye, he looks better than Stower in the outfield., although that is a small sample I've observed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Sort of.   I mean, playing in the outfield, yeah.

But if Vavra vs. Stowers is the comp, it's clear that they're preferring guys who have a better plate approach and have positional versatility.  I'm under no illusion that Vavra is a great defender, btw.  

But not every guy has to be versatile.

How versatile is Mullins? Mountcastle? Mateo? Hays?  I mean, some guys just play where they are supposed to play and that’s it. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Right, so a 103 OPS+ last year and a 107 OPS+ in his vaunted 2021 campaign....or 3% and 7% better than the average big league hitter across two seasons.

I'm not sure that 5% average of being better than league average is worth a vigorous defense, but hey, whatever makes you happy.

My "vigorous" defense amounts to: 

He's very likely better than Stowers right now, thus it makes perfect sense he should be playing over Stowers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

I'm not sure why.  They have similar offensive output, one is based on power and one is based in on-base ability.  Neither is a good defender, but Vavra is certainly more versatile.  To my eye, he looks better than Stower in the outfield., although that is a small sample I've observed.

Vavra doesn’t have close to the upside. Stowers can be an everyday player. Vavra can’t.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

My "vigorous" defense amounts to: 

He's very likely better than Stowers right now, thus it makes perfect sense he should be playing over Stowers.

The days Vavra started over him may have been matchup based from the analytics department? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Vavra doesn’t have close to the upside. Stowers can be an everyday player. Vavra can’t.

I don't necessarily disagree with that at least as an outfielder.

But there's obviously a balance between win now and development, and if the O's think Vavra gives them a better chance today of winning games than Stowers, I get it.  I'm not sure I agree, but I get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Gunnar is the only one you worry about. I would still sign Holliday as well but I think Gunnar is the bigger fish to fry. I no longer would consider an extension for Adley. I would wait on anyone else.
    • Something that doesn't show up on the stat sheet is something like being able to hit behind the runner to advance him.   The O's have been successful in building an analytics offense.   Focus on hitting homeruns, develop a swing to achieve optimum launch angle and exit velocity to hit the ball over the fence.  Result is they have a team of beer league software players and not baseball players and struggle to score when not hitting homeruns.   Analytically, if you review their offensive rankings for the season, it says, nothing wrong with the offense, at least from a macro review, but we all know that this offense has issues.   Runs - 4th Home runs - 3rd AVG - 7th OBP - 11th SLG - 3rd OPS - 4th  K's - 18th (this was interesting to see considering how much they seem to strikeout) All of the above looks good, nothing to fix. The O's had 6 sacrifice hits for the season, ranking 30th.  Interestingly, Arizona who led the league in runs scored also led the league in sacrifice hits with 34.   The O's do not need to necessarily to focus on small ball, but they do need to be able to add that skillset to their offensive arsenal.  
    • Sounds like Buck. Anything to get a slight advantage. It’s something this team sorely misses. 
    • Detroit has been so much fun to watch. They have Skubal and literally 11 completely interchangeable pitchers who Hinch uses at any time and in any situation. They all can start games, throw in middle relief, and close. Every Tigers pitcher has to be ready to come in at any time because nobody other than Skubal actually has a defined role, which can certainly help keep them focused.  That guy Holton who started Game 1 in Cleveland closed Game 3 yesterday.  Of course he did! And Hinch seems to have complete faith in everybody, which I guess works since they all seem to have rubber arms and never get tired. It must be so annoying as an opposing manager to try and game plan against them or to be a hitter and have absolutely no idea who you are going to be facing until you actually walk up to the plate.  Not sure how long this "gimmick" will last, but it has been really enjoyable.
    • So if Westburg ends up being a very good but not MVP level player you aren't interesting in extending him at a team friendly rate? I disagree with your strategy. If you can lock up even a young 3 win player at a team friendly rate I say do it.
    • The most obvious player to extend is Gunnar, his agent is Boras, which means most likely, he will not be interested in an extension.  All others, you have to wait and see.  Adley after that horrible second half, you really need to see if he bounces back.  Westburg, need a full season before locking him up, plus he would probably want a season to post big numbers.  Cowser, wait and see if he learns the strike zone before extending.  
    • I agree with you on Gunnar. I'd wait on Westburg until he puts up a Gunnar like season, and spend money on Burnes this offseason. Oh and do something temporary to bring the RF wall in 10-15 feet
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...