Jump to content

Hyde interview with Russo


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

Mad dog is the worst, almost unwatchable like Stephen A. I saw Russo on ESPN once stating that Cooper Kupp doesn’t need to play another down and would make the Hall of Fame. This was just last year. He completely lost all credibility on sports after saying that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Os4days said:

Mad dog is the worst, almost unwatchable like Stephen A. I saw Russo on ESPN once stating that Cooper Kupp doesn’t need to play another down and would make the Hall of Fame. This was just last year. He completely lost all credibility on sports after saying that. 

These people exist for the hot takes.  

You wouldn't be talking about him if he said something reasonable about Cooper Kupp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Russo I separate style and substance.   His voice is excruciating, and he talks too much and too fast.  But, I usually find his questions well-informed and fairly specific.  He usually knows more about his subject than most national TV guys, IMO.   I haven’t listened to this interview, but will do so. 

I should add that my only exposure to Russo has been when he’s interviewing people affiliated with the Orioles.  I don’t know anything about his “hot takes,” or how he is on other subjects. 
 

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

With Russo I separate style and substance.   His voice is excruciating, and he talks too much and too fast.  But, I usually find his questions well-informed and fairly specific.  He usually knows more about his subject than most national TV guys, IMO.   I haven’t listened to this interview, but will do so. 

I should add that my only exposure to Russo has been when he’s interviewing people affiliated with the Orioles.  I don’t know anything about his “hot takes,” or how he is on other subjects. 
 

Pretty much my exact thoughts re Russo. His insights are actually pretty good and he tends to have decent knowledge of the Os when he talks about them. It’s worth tolerating the style, which actually isn’t as bad anyway when you’re a little used to it. I like the guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Just Regular said:

I tape Brian Kenny's show and most days the extra 30 seconds in the DVR catches Russo's outro.

Yesterday his MLB Power Rankings for the week had all five AL East teams in the top 10, even the Red Sox.

Hard to argue with that really. Sox have exceeded expectations thus far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...