Jump to content

The Adam Frazier Hate


Mr-splash

Recommended Posts

I don't get it. I do understand Frazier is not a hugely talented big leaguer, but this idea that Frazier is a bad ballplayer has been bizarre to see this season from fans. Every fanbase needs a whipping boy and a scapegoat to blame when a tough loss occurs. Frazier seems to be that guy for us. Frazier has a career 2.5 WAA. Meaning that he's actually been a very slightly above average big league ballplayer for his career. His first two seasons he was a bad defender, but every single season since he has graded as a plus defender with the glove at 2nd base. His OPS right now is .704

 

Ramon Urias is the best infielder in the organization right now. Mateo is probably the 2nd best. Frazier is the 3rd best. Gunnar and Mounty are the 4th and 5th best. Why is Frazier playing? Well, he's just better than the other guys in the organization right now. I'm not talking about future projections. You can point to guys like Ortiz, Westburg, Norby, etc. But Frazier is a proven commodity. Right now.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

Why is Frazier playing? Well, he's just better than the other guys in the organization right now. I'm not talking about future projections. You can point to guys like Ortiz, Westburg, Norby, etc. But Frazier is a proven commodity. Right now.

Proven at doing what? OPSing ~.700 for his career? Which he's underperforming this year?

He made three or four bad plays at second within the first five inning tonight. This as Joey Ortiz is fighting for playing time and whipping the ball over from third base.

Ortiz and Westburg are almost 25 years old. They're both several years out of college. They're not teenagers who are still learning the nuances of the game.

There's good reason to believe that every single one of, let alone any one of, the five or six guys who could replace Frazier would be better right now. Reasonable minds can disagree there, but it's certainly not a shoo-in that playing one of the prospects would be mortgaging present-day value.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alasdaire said:

Proven at doing what? OPSing ~.700 for his career? Which he's underperforming this year?

He made three or four bad plays at second within the first five inning tonight. This as Joey Ortiz is fighting for playing time and whipping the ball over from third base.

Ortiz and Westburg are almost 25 years old. They're both several years out of college. They're not teenagers who are still learning the nuances of the game.

There's good reason to believe that every single one of, let alone any one of, the five or six guys who could replace Frazier would be better right now. Reasonable minds can disagree there, but it's certainly not a shoo-in that playing one of the prospects would be mortgaging present-day value.

 

Yes, I know Ortiz has a plus glove, but so does Frazier. You don't grade as a plus defender for 6 consecutive years if you can't field the position. Now as far as the bat goes, Ortiz did produce a single tonight. Frazier put one over the wall.

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr-splash said:

 

Yes, I know Ortiz has a plus glove, but so does Frazier. You don't grade as a plus defender for 6 consecutive years if you can't field the position. Now as far as the bat goes, Ortiz did produce a single tonight. Frazier put one over the wall.

If you're basing your valuation of Adam Frazier on his slugging ability, then I've got a bridge to sell you.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alasdaire said:

If you're basing your valuation of Adam Frazier on his slugging ability, then I've got a bridge to sell you.

You don't have to sell anything. You can go check out his baseball reference right now. You don't play 864 games and end up with a postive WAA if you can't play baseball at the MLB level.

Edited by Mr-splash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The main issue with Frazier is that we know the team has a very limited budget and spending 8M on Frazier when the team is rife with middle infielder prospects makes little sense.

Well he kind of shown his value tonight homering in a short LF porch in which 4 out of 5 AL East parks showcase. Im beginning to kind of see why Elias said he wanted a LH 2B. Personally I would have rolled with one of Westburg-Otiz-Urias at 2B. But thats just me. Elias clearly had other plans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr-splash said:

You don't have to sell anything. You can go check out his baseball reference right now. You don't play 864 guys and end up with a postive WAA if you can't play baseball at the MLB level.

He is a major league baseball player, sure. But at his best, he was mediocre. And he is on the back end of that trajectory now.

His play also doesn't exist in a vacuum; we have an embarrassment of riches waiting in the wings. I am confident that one of them would be an average defender and OPS over .685. It's not a high bar.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The main issue with Frazier is that we know the team has a very limited budget and spending 8M on Frazier when the team is rife with middle infielder prospects makes little sense.

What if he's just better than they are right now? He's outplaying Gunnar right now believe it or not. He's outplaying Mounty. In the 8 games Ortiz has played, he's outplayed Ortiz. The rebuild is coming to an end. I am loving the fact that we are winning games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

What if he's just better than they are right now? He's outplaying Gunnar right now believe it or not. He's outplaying Mounty. In the 8 games Ortiz has played, he's outplayed Ortiz. The rebuild is coming to an end. I am loving the fact that we are winning games.  

What if the 8M could have been spent to make some other move that would have made an even bigger positive difference?

What if the reason he's outplaying Ortiz is because Ortiz hasn't been up all year?

I want the team to follow a sensible process.  Baseball is full of chaos and bad moves can and will pay off just like the proper move can fail miserably.

Spending ~10% of the teams payroll on Frazier isn't a sensible move.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree it didn’t make sense to sign Frazier considering all the young talent we have but I’m okay with it because he’s a veteran. Having that veteran presence can be helpful for a team with zero playoff experience. 
 

Hey he is on pace for more homers and RBIs than Trea Turner who got a $300 million contract. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

I don't get it. I do understand Frazier is not a hugely talented big leaguer, but this idea that Frazier is a bad ballplayer has been bizarre to see this season from fans. Every fanbase needs a whipping boy and a scapegoat to blame when a tough loss occurs. Frazier seems to be that guy for us. Frazier has a career 2.5 WAA. Meaning that he's actually been a very slightly above average big league ballplayer for his career. His first two seasons he was a bad defender, but every single season since he has graded as a plus defender with the glove at 2nd base. His OPS right now is .704

 

Ramon Urias is the best infielder in the organization right now. Mateo is probably the 2nd best. Frazier is the 3rd best. Gunnar and Mounty are the 4th and 5th best. Why is Frazier playing? Well, he's just better than the other guys in the organization right now. I'm not talking about future projections. You can point to guys like Ortiz, Westburg, Norby, etc. But Frazier is a proven commodity. Right now.

I thought Ryan McKenna was our whipping boy. He'll be at Fanfest in 20 years and someone will mention the fact he dropped a fly ball once

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...