Jump to content

My annual head first slide thread


webbrick2010

Recommended Posts

There are several advantages to a head first slide.   

With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker.

When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it.

You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag. 

Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the data say? It seems like we have data for almost everything in baseball these days. If the question is as stated, "what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players(?)" then the data should be analyzed to determine if the risk of injury is worth the benefit of sliding head-first. I've never seen any data that supports one sliding technique over another. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

What's the data say? It seems like we have data for almost everything in baseball these days. If the question is as stated, "what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players(?)" then the data should be analyzed to determine if the risk of injury is worth the benefit of sliding head-first. I've never seen any data that supports one sliding technique over another. 

This article cites research showing head first is twice as likely to cause injury. I don't know how you could prove one is generically better than the other since one technique may be better than the other for any specific play depending on the timing and location of the defender etc. It's not like a force play at first where the only variable is time to the bag.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/02/sports/baseball/headfirst-slides-increase-risk-of-injury.html

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

By the way, something they absolutely need to legislate is the size of the oven mitt. I forget who it was, one of these guys had one that was basically giving him 18 inch fingers.

The question I'd pose is do we want more base stealing or less? I think I'd like to see more, so I'd generally be against most rules that cut back on that. Even with the recent rules changes and the mitts that have bumped up steals by roughly 50%, we're only back to the level steals were in the 90s. And not even close to deadball era baserunning. I don't see what the oven mitts are hurting.

If anything, I'd be more in favor of limiting fielding glove sizes to help offenses a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first year in little league we were taught that the proper way to slide was using the mechanics of what is now essential known as a "pop up slide". Basically feet first with one leg bent underneath your strait leg to cushion the transition to the dirt smoothly, and you can pop up if you need to once your momentum carries you to the bag. 

We went undefeated that 1st year of baseball and won the Championship. Our coaches taught us excellently all about baseball.

We also had a name for head first slides. We called it "doing a Pete Rose".  It became a dare for some of the kids.

Personally I never understood Pere Rose slides or head first slides. I see how easy it is to do a big ole belly flop by accident and knock the wind out of yourself, or worse, get injured. Getting hit in the head by a throw or an attempted tag or getting your hand stepped on by a basemen is a good example of the risk.

I'd rather do a hook slide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...