Jump to content

Jorge Lopez Clears Waivers: Any interest?


Radagast

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

He's been terrible since he was traded two years ago. He refused a minor league assignment with us last year. He can find somewhere else to pitch terribly.

When did Lopez refuse a milb assignment with us last year?  We acquired him right before the September 1 postseason eligibility deadline last year.  We just left him off the post season roster.  The Mets offered him $2 million guaranteed on a mlb deal over the offseason.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

When did Lopez refuse a milb assignment with us last year?  We acquired him right before the September 1 postseason eligibility deadline last year.  We just left him off the post season roster.  The Mets offered him $2 million guaranteed on a mlb deal over the offseason.  

image.thumb.png.d9f0528416d90b7f365f6088a83261fe.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Anything to support this? As bad as Baker was last season, he was still much better than Lopez.

Baker's numbers last season were a bit deceiving. He pitched very well in April (1.88 ERA in 14 games) only to completely fall apart in May and June putting up a near 6.00 ERA between the two months across 22 games. That's not to say Lopez was good last year, he really wasn't. But look at Baker this year. 

Prior to his 5 scoreless appearances at AAA, he had an 8.47 ERA, 875 OPS against, walked 12 in only 17 IP and allowed 4 dingers. A 1.70 WHIP. And that was at AAA.

Say what you will about Lopez. His ERA is a bit deceiving this year - 3.76 ERA, but a 4.66 FIP. Is he an answer to the O's bullpen woes? Absolutely not. Is he better than Bryan Baker? I'd say so.

But then again, I'm on record saying Baumann should have never been traded while keeping Akin on the roster who has options and a history of inconsistency and injuries with an inability to pitch well with runners on base. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Baker's numbers last season were a bit deceiving. He pitched very well in April (1.88 ERA in 14 games) only to completely fall apart in May and June putting up a near 6.00 ERA between the two months across 22 games. That's not to say Lopez was good last year, he really wasn't. But look at Baker this year. 

Prior to his 5 scoreless appearances at AAA, he had an 8.47 ERA, 875 OPS against, walked 12 in only 17 IP and allowed 4 dingers. A 1.70 WHIP. And that was at AAA.

Say what you will about Lopez. His ERA is a bit deceiving this year - 3.76 ERA, but a 4.66 FIP. Is he an answer to the O's bullpen woes? Absolutely not. Is he better than Bryan Baker? I'd say so.

But then again, I'm on record saying Baumann should have never been traded while keeping Akin on the roster who has options and a history of inconsistency and injuries with an inability to pitch well with runners on base. 

Well said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Prior to his 5 scoreless appearances at AAA, he had an 8.47 ERA, 875 OPS against, walked 12 in only 17 IP and allowed 4 dingers. A 1.70 WHIP. And that was at AAA.

Say what you will about Lopez. His ERA is a bit deceiving this year - 3.76 ERA, but a 4.66 FIP. Is he an answer to the O's bullpen woes? Absolutely not. Is he better than Bryan Baker? I'd say so.

And Lopez allowed a .333/.429/.583 slash line since May 1st

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DirtyBird said:

And Lopez allowed a .333/.429/.583 slash line since May 1st

Right. I don't think Lopez is our answer, but I don't think Bryan Baker is the answer to anything for this club. I want to be wrong. I want him to do well. I really do enjoy his reverse walk back to the dugout after innings. But man, he's a right handed version of Keegan Akin. Really bad with runners on, serviceable in clean innings. The problem is we've seen Hyde throw caution to the wind with the runners on stat for whatever reason, and it's routinely burnt the O's when it comes to guys like Akin or Baker. And maybe that's a function of them having to be used at some point and having selective situations really hamstrings the bullpen...but that proves my point about Baker not being the answer. Hell, Akin isn't the answer.

Edited by LookitsPuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...