Jump to content

Orioles acquire Gregory Soto


eddie83

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He got a little lucky last night. Line drive deep in the gap that Cowser flagged down with only a 55% catch probability, followed by a long fly ball right to the fence in CF.  Then a single before another fly out.  Not really a great outing despite a good result.  

55% catch probability means that ball in caught more times then not.

So other relievers don't have good defense behind them?   He kept them in the park and  he has been for 10 outings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

We have data from about 4 years that says Gregory Soto is a pretty ok, nothing special, reliever.  He walks too many, doesn't strike out a ton of guys, and gives up runs like a pretty average reliever.

Pretty ok enough to save 30 games in one season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

Pretty ok enough to save 30 games in one season.

LOL.  Yep.  Pretty much any ok reliever can rack up 30 saves if you give them the closers job on a half way decent team.  That was 3-4 years ago but even then, besides the saves, what was so special about his numbers?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

LOL.  Yep.  Pretty much any ok reliever can rack up 30 saves if you give them the closers job on a half way decent team.  That was 3-4 years ago but even then, besides the saves, what was so special about his numbers?

Cionel Perez Career: ERA 3.65, ERA+ 113, K/BB 1.77, 0.4 WAR per season

Soto 2021: ERA 3.39, ERA+ 126, K/BB 1.90, 18 saves, 1.7 WAR

Soto 2022: ERA 3.28, ERA+ 119, K/BB 1.76, 30 saves, 0.1 WAR

I think 2021 is pretty clearly better. The 30 save season was just a tad better than Perez but imho pitching as a closer counts for something. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Pretty ok enough to save 30 games in one season.

And Kevin Gregg did that not once, not twice, but thrice.

He also finished his career with a 4.24 ERA and a WHIP of 1.39, both of which are actually better than Soto's career marks to this point (4.31 and 1.44).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

We have data from about 4 years that says Gregory Soto is a pretty ok, nothing special, reliever.  He walks too many, doesn't strike out a ton of guys, and gives up runs like a pretty average reliever.

I havent looked it up, but how many guys in our bullpen have had 10 consecutive scoreless outings. He was a solid pickup for a pen that desperately needed help. I am not letting 2 blowup outings a month ago overshadow how he has looked otherwise. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, terpoh said:

I havent looked it up, but how many guys in our bullpen have had 10 consecutive scoreless outings. He was a solid pickup for a pen that desperately needed help. I am not letting 2 blowup outings a month ago overshadow how he has looked otherwise. 

I did a quick look at this- looks like Webb had 10 scoreless outings in a row once, Cano did once and Kimbrel did twice. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

So three All-Stars at the top of their game and Webb.

I think he means this year, not any time in their career.  I guarantee you that Kimbrel has done it way more than twice in his career.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think he means this year, not any time in their career.  I guarantee you that Kimbrel has done it way more than twice in his career.  

Yes, this year. Was just curious as to how "Rare" going ten consecutive scoreless is for our 2024 team. Soto has settled in very nicely and was a big need for our team. If there were trades to be upset about, as of now, his was not one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, terpoh said:

Yes, this year. Was just curious as to how "Rare" going ten consecutive scoreless is for our 2024 team. Soto has settled in very nicely and was a big need for our team. If there were trades to be upset about, as of now, his was not one

If we gave up two potential ML starters for a pretty standard bullpen arm then I’d say we heavily overpaid.    It may have been a need but he did stink for his first 3-4 appearances and has been kept mostly out of high leverage spots.   I don’t think he’s been an integral part of the bullpen although he has turned it around.    
 

Just because the player acquired fills a need doesn’t make it a good trade.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish we didn’t have to give Johnson and Chace. I think Johnson straight up for soto felt more appropriate. But I do think that Elias probably didn’t want to end up empty handed like last year, and dug deep for Rogers and Soto. And I don’t necessarily blame him. Just hate to trade two arms when we’ve struggle to develop them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RZNJ said:

If we gave up two potential ML starters for a pretty standard bullpen arm then I’d say we heavily overpaid.    It may have been a need but he did stink for his first 3-4 appearances and has been kept mostly out of high leverage spots.   I don’t think he’s been an integral part of the bullpen although he has turned it around.    
 

Just because the player acquired fills a need doesn’t make it a good trade.

Calling Moises Chace and Seth Johnson "potential ML Starters" means that you can pretty much call any minor league prospect the same. Nothing against them at all, they are both very talented, but They both have equally as much chance (and probably more) of NOT being long term ML starters. Neither was top 100, neither was one of our top 10, and neither is in the Phillies top 10 now. Does it suck to lose guys? Sure. But come on man, we have to trade people to get people. Elias gets called a "hoarder" for not trading guys, then gets lambasted for trading guys that are not any of our top guys. Nobody expects Gregory Soto to be prime Aroldis Chatman, but if he can be a reliable arm in the pen down the stretch and in the playoffs and in 2025 then how is that not a good trade? You dont need to "win" every trade for it to be a good trade. If Soto is good for us but Seth Johnson is good for philly, its a bad trade? Lets not forget we acquired Seth Johnson for far less. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, terpoh said:

Calling Moises Chace and Seth Johnson "potential ML Starters" means that you can pretty much call any minor league prospect the same. Nothing against them at all, they are both very talented, but They both have equally as much chance (and probably more) of NOT being long term ML starters. Neither was top 100, neither was one of our top 10, and neither is in the Phillies top 10 now. Does it suck to lose guys? Sure. But come on man, we have to trade people to get people. Elias gets called a "hoarder" for not trading guys, then gets lambasted for trading guys that are not any of our top guys. Nobody expects Gregory Soto to be prime Aroldis Chatman, but if he can be a reliable arm in the pen down the stretch and in the playoffs and in 2025 then how is that not a good trade? You dont need to "win" every trade for it to be a good trade. If Soto is good for us but Seth Johnson is good for philly, its a bad trade? Lets not forget we acquired Seth Johnson for far less. 

At the time of the trade, I’d agree with your description of Johnson and Chace.    It’s kind of scary how each was promoted and put up really good numbers (SSS) at the next level after the trade.  Each, are among the few pitching prospects we have in the upper minors that actually sit mid 90’s.

My fear is that in hindsight this trade is going to look a lot, lot worse than it did at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It takes Orioles rookies 60 or 70 at bats to get their first two hits.
    • Tell me how can Harbaugh help him when he doesn't know how to help himself. Harbs is the worst at burning timeouts stupidly then not having any when they are needed at crunch time. 
    • Yes the same here. They are going to the playoffs and yet I have no feeling towards it whatsoever. Weird feeling. Like you just know they are going to get bounced in the first round. It looks inevitable. I mean you could make a case the Tigers are more deserving of the Orioles spot. They are playing some great baseball of late. 
    • Man Baltimore sports has not been kind. The Orioles are on a  3 month tailspin and the Ravens did what they do best and blew another double digit 4th quarter lead to a inferior team.  Let's see if the Orioles can right the ship,  though I'm not holding my breath on that one at all. Yikes. 
    • Idk how impactful this was, probably pretty low on the list of problems, but this is the 2nd straight week that Lamar threw the ball late in the game and the receiver was unable to get oob.  The ball to Bateman is probably excusable because we had more time on the clock and we needed the deep ball to be in position to make a run, but this time throwing a 12 yard dump to Andrews was just straight up stupid IMO.  I get that they're going to play outside leverage all day every day in this situation but just throw it away and try to take another shot.  Lamar has to have more clock awareness than that,  and Harbaugh has to instill in him the importance of saving those seconds on the clock.
    • Sorry but that response from Fuller sounds to me like too many words, concepts, abstractions, and if that's how he communicates, wordy and convoluted, it's a lot for hitters to carry "into the box." Not to mention all the specifics involved, re. what pitches and locations to look for, all the analytics of how to do the swing and torque the body, etc. I'm no coach but I can imagine a whole season of this approach just becomes information overload. Maybe it's not rocket science, after all (with all due respect to ex-NASA Sig). Maybe the antidote is more Zen: just see the pitch and hit the dang thing.  BTW I think the analytical, overthinking approach is better suited to the pitching side, where you can plan your attack based on all the data. Hitting is more reaction, no time to think. You can't beat pitching using the same approach--rather, need the opposite approach, to counter with instinct and intuition. At least, that's my cheap (2 cents) advice!
    • The proposition that every auction automatically results in an overpay is simplified indeed.  Granted, "kind of true" is a low bar to clear, but still...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...