Jump to content

Trevor Rogers 2024


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

Just now, LookitsPuck said:

Marlins really fleeced the O’s. No other way to put it. 

Eh.

If Norby and Stowers had the level of interest in them that I think they did the O's weren't going to get a difference maker for them anyway.

Is getting Rodgers for them (who is making under 2M) any worse that than getting rando non-prospects?

Of course if you think those two had real value, the equation is much different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Eh.

If Norby and Stowers had the level of interest in them that I think they did the O's weren't going to get a difference maker for them anyway.

Is getting Rodgers for them (who is making under 2M) any worse that than getting rando non-prospects?

Of course if you think those two had real value, the equation is much different.

I’ve been high on Norby for awhile. And you don’t give up guys, even with some holes in his game, for a project arm that is still probably lingering with arm issues. Any keyboard warrior could simply look up his Statcast to see how awful he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Marlins really fleeced the O’s. No other way to put it. 

They fleeced themselves. Maybe there’s something they can do to fix him but you don’t give up good players to get reclamation projects. You pick them up on the waiver wire like he normally does.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookitsPuck said:

BR is a bit behind. Even still, I’d put money on Norby having a net positive career overall vs Rogers from here on out.

I'm not being pro Rodgers.

I just don't think Norby had any real trade value and that he wasn't going to play for the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not being pro Rodgers.

I just don't think Norby had any real trade value and that he wasn't going to play for the O's.

I think he had better value and Elias got desperate. Don’t disagree that he wouldn’t play for the O’s, they’re giving time to Eloy fercrissakes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not being pro Rodgers.

I just don't think Norby had any real trade value and that he wasn't going to play for the O's.

Exactly, we traded two guys who will never play for us for a pitcher who may or may not play for us. It's not exactly a win but it's not a loss, at least not yet, on either side 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

Exactly, we traded two guys who will never play for us for a pitcher who may or may not play for us. It's not exactly a win but it's not a loss, at least not yet, on either side 

Responsible for 2 losses, no wins, over 7 ERA, stole starts from Povich are all net negatives to me. Also lost prospect capital. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...