Jump to content

Vance Honeycutt


wildcard

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, doccat said:

12 K’s in 28 at-bats in almost the lowest rung of the minors….  I know, it’s early and he’s just getting his first experience in professional ball….  
 

still….  Alarming.

No doubt.  His debut and O’Ferall’s are going to put the Orioles hitting lab to the test after the season.   More consistent contact for Honeycutt and impacting the ball for O’Ferrall.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, doccat said:

12 K’s in 28 at-bats in almost the lowest rung of the minors….  I know, it’s early and he’s just getting his first experience in professional ball….  
 

still….  Alarming.

It really shouldn't be surprising or alarming at this point.  He struck out a ton in college, so I think it's unreasonable for him to all of sudden him stop striking out so soon after being drafted.  The real test will be if the hitting development staff can work with him to reduce that over the next couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Otter said:

It really shouldn't be surprising or alarming at this point.  He struck out a ton in college, so I think it's unreasonable for him to all of sudden him stop striking out so soon after being drafted.  The real test will be if the hitting development staff can work with him to reduce that over the next couple years.

He struck out 28% in college.   28 PA is a SSS but if he K’d 45 times in his first 100 PA in low A that would be surprising and alarming to me.   Plus, he’s not hitting for much power yet.   Again, SSS, but not the kind of start you like to see.   A high pick from a major D1 conference should be kicking butt in low A.    
 

If this is a true indication of where he’s at (Not saying it is) then he’s a bigger project than I expected and I was dubious of picking him for just that reason.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Otter said:

It really shouldn't be surprising or alarming at this point.  He struck out a ton in college, so I think it's unreasonable for him to all of sudden him stop striking out so soon after being drafted.  The real test will be if the hitting development staff can work with him to reduce that over the next couple years.

Correct. He was a high risk/high reward pick. We knew that. In a down draft, they took a swing at a big talent with a huge question mark. This isn’t going to be solved in a few weeks after not playing for a while.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strikeouts don't necessarily bother me...  You can be a hall of fame caliber player with a lot of strikeouts- Reggie Jackson, Alex Rodriguez, Miguel Cabrera...

 

But you need to absolutely mash in your non-strikeout at-bats...   so far, no mashing....   but he's only 28 at-bats in to his career, so let's see what he can do over the next 2 years...

 

I remain skeptical- I'm not sure pitch recognition and zone judgement can be taught, or "fixed" especially at this age....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DocJJ said:

Strikeouts don't necessarily bother me...  You can be a hall of fame caliber player with a lot of strikeouts- Reggie Jackson, Alex Rodriguez, Miguel Cabrera...

 

But you need to absolutely mash in your non-strikeout at-bats...   so far, no mashing....   but he's only 28 at-bats in to his career, so let's see what he can do over the next 2 years...

 

I remain skeptical- I'm not sure pitch recognition and zone judgement can be taught, or "fixed" especially at this age....

The amount of strikeouts can certainly be a huge red flag.  Hypothetically, if Honeycutt were to play next year in Aberdeen and K 40% of the time it wouldn’t matter if he hit 30 homers.   
 

Jud Fabian.

Edited by RZNJ
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder if the O’s feel changing his vertical hand placement so that he doesn’t have such a long swing will help with his strikeout rate. The elite defense is up there with Bradfield, so he comes across as a higher upside Fabian without the contact skills of Bradfield.

This draft is really going to put their science approach to the test. We haven’t seen the fruits of it, yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some really notable names on the top 75 MLB strikeout leaders- Mike Schmidt, Eddie Murray, Ken Griffey Jr, Derek Jeter, Craig Biggio, David Ortiz.   It's what you do in your non-strikeout at-bats...    which unfortunately for Honeycutt is nothing...  at least through his first 7 games.  It's also concerning that this is at Delmarva- he should at least be hitting this level o.k.   

 

He will be a good proof-of-concept case- whether you can take a guy loaded with tools, but serious contact problems, and turn him into something of value...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DocJJ said:

There are some really notable names on the top 75 MLB strikeout leaders- Mike Schmidt, Eddie Murray, Ken Griffey Jr, Derek Jeter, Craig Biggio, David Ortiz.   It's what you do in your non-strikeout at-bats...    which unfortunately for Honeycutt is nothing...  at least through his first 7 games.  It's also concerning that this is at Delmarva- he should at least be hitting this level o.k.   

 

He will be a good proof-of-concept case- whether you can take a guy loaded with tools, but serious contact problems, and turn him into something of value...

I'm not going to try to draw conclusions on 7 games

  For a guy just starting in the minors, that's not even a sample, much less small smple size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The splits for the second half definitely do kinda look like that on the surface, but it was more an issue of one awful slump, rather than an overall second half swoon, especially in 2023. In 2023, he really just had a terrible week or so, which unfortunately happened to be the last week of the season. He went 0 for his last 23, dropping his OPS from .855 to .801 in the process. Prior to that dreadful week, he’d posted an .846 OPS in the second half. This past season, of course, it was almost a whole terrible month — starting right around the day Mountcastle went out. From 8/18 to 9/15, he put up a .411 OPS over the span of 80 PAs. Absolutely awful. But sandwiched around that malaise were two good second half stints, with a combined .926 OPS in 130 second half PAs before and after that tailspin.    Anyhow, I don’t think there’s any way they decline that option. The guy is a quality hitter, so even if they do want to move on — which I don’t think they will — he’d have value to somebody at that relatively low price. Especially if they were willing to eat a few bucks to sweeten the return. If they somehow get a bona fide starting RF from outside the organization, then I think maybe they move him. You don’t want him blocking Kjerstad again, but at present, I think it’s reasonable to imagine that they could both find 400-500 PAs. 
    • Im not sure what the deal is with Holliday-to-CF truthers, but he was above average by OAA, average by UZR, and slightly below by DRS at 2B, so it feels like we should give him the opportunity to improve there rather than move him to a position he hasn't really played in his career.
    • If that’s the case , then they can trade Bradfield for other options 
    • Perez seems like an easy re-up to me. You need arms, they're not all going to be perfect. He's got some strengths.
    • Garcia is getting some pub from different spots.  Could be a major riser.
    • They did guarantee his arbitration years but they didn’t add any years to their control.  
    • Tis' the season for over the top, which should end around Opening Day... Sign Bregman, move Westburg back to 2B.  Lose O'Hearn and make Kjerstad the LH platoon at 1B along with Mountcastle.  Holliday quickly transitions to CF (because if Merrill can do it, naturally so can Holliday) and Mullins is in RF along with a RHB 1-year FA stopgap while Mayo learns RF in Norfolk.  Henderson, Rutschman, Cowser no change. If someone brings up the subject of defense, kindly look the other way.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...