Jump to content

How Many More Wins?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Looch said:

Was listening to local Detroit radio today.  Will definitely miss him this time, but there discussion of whether they will change their rotation rest schedule.  
 

planning to go to games Saturday and Sunday!

They could if they want to give him extra rest but it makes sense to make sure he pitches vs KC instead of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say 6 or 7, but we get back our "cavalry" in the last week and add Westy, Mounty, Kjerstad, Urias, Grayson, Webb and Coulombe to our playoff roster making us much more dangerous for an October run. 

As I re-read that, its just absurd that we could potentially add 7 big contributors to this team. We are suck a different team with Westy/Mounty/Kjerstad/Urias for Eloy/Rivera/Soto/Maton and Grayson/Webb/Coulombe for Smith/Kimbrel/Povich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GoldGlove21 said:

I think we go 9-7 and still lose the division by a game or less. I do not think that we win a 3+ game playoff series.

Can’t lose the division by less than a game unless NY sweeps us and we finish with the same record. (Pretty sure they don’t do game 163 anymore)

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GoldGlove21 said:

I think we go 9-7 and still lose the division by a game or less. I do not think that we win a 3+ game playoff series.

How do we lose by less?   They’ll all play 162 games by the end of the season, if those games are meaningful to the playoff race.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

How do we lose by less?   They’ll all play 162 games by the end of the season, if those games are meaningful to the playoff race.  

Technically I think we will lose the division if we finish with identical records to the NYY AND if they sweep us in the final series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aglets said:

Technically I think we will lose the division if we finish with identical records to the NYY AND if they sweep us in the final series.

That’s true.   I’ll be shocked if things play out that way.   I just don’t see a scenario occurring where we get swept by the Yankees but equal them in wins.  And man, would I HATE that outcome.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...