Jump to content

Clubhouse issues?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

He answered the question appropriately. It ISNT his job to respond to "not being on the same page". His job is to pitch. And he did his job well tonight.He deserved better.

I didn’t interpret his answer as suggesting there were clubhouse issues.  More like “sorry, not my table.”

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, terpoh said:

I mean we literally have 12 out of the opening day 26 hopeful contributors (13 if you include Felix) on the IL. I know every team deals with injuries- we were very fortunate last year on that end. But losing nearly 50% of your roster, many of which are big time contributors, is going to put us at a big time talent deficit. 

Westburg/Mounty/Urias/Kjerstad/Mateo instead of Rivera/Soto/Maton/Jimenez/Mayo is a huge dropoff. 

Bradish/Means/Wells/Grayson led to a huge dropoff.

Coulombe/Webb instead of Smith/Selby/Irvin/Bowman etc is a huge drop off.

Our saving grace is that 6-7 of these guys could be coming back in the next 2 weeks.

The problem isn’t the guys who are injured. It’s the terrible play from the regulars who are not, and how Hyde is using the players. Yes, we have substandard replacements, and that’s not Hyde’s fault, but the embarrassing play is his responsibility.

Edited by HowAboutThat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I didn’t interpret his answer as suggesting there were clubhouse issues.  More like “sorry, not my table.”

Exactly right. The question didn’t really make any sense to begin with and he basically answered with a, “i don’t know. Why are you asking me?”  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, HowAboutThat said:

The problem isn’t the guys who are injured. It’s the terrible play from the regulars who are not, and how Hyde is using the players. Yes, we have substandard replacements, and that’s not Hyde’s fault, but the embarrassing play is his responsibility.

What does this even mean? You note that we have replacements that aren’t as good, admit that it’s not Hyde’s fault, then blame him for the mistakes that arise from them being substandard players. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

How could any of us know if he lost the clubhouse when none of us have clubhouse access?

That’s a fair question, and of course no one can know. But these guys aren’t stupid. They know something is wrong, and it goes beyond the players. We have the replacement level replacements, who are doing their best because they make $6,000 per day and want to keep it up, but they are replacement level for a reason.

But regulars who are playing terrible know they are playing terrible, and they know the other guys are awful and they’re all thinking “oh &#$, not again.” Of course they support each other, but it’s impossible not to be frustrated. And it happens over and over and over again. Every single game bonehead plays abound.

I think they all care, especially when one guy does an outstanding job, and another completely wastes it.

It’s impossible for that to not build up into tremendous frustration, especially when the players may think it’s improper for them to call each other out, so they have to suck it up.

So, you are correct, we have no idea what goes on in there. But it would be ridiculous to think there isn’t any friction that needs to be dealt with. And dealing with it is Hyde’s job.

As an aside, that question just show how stupid most baseball reporters are. As @clapdiddy mentioned, what does the question even mean? Kremer’s answer was fine, but a better response would have been” what do you mean by that?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Just based off of that quote, is there any reason to think some underlying issues are going on. Like I said, maybe not with the clubhouse but maybe the players aren’t happy with the FO?

That goes without saying, the players are smarter than we are and have strong ideas about what should be done, especially when what IS being done is failing so badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

 

Whatever the question was, he says he's not answering it and it's a question for the front office. I don't see how that means or implies anything negative. Maybe there is something going on but that quote is not evidence. 

Although I think there are serious problems, I agree with you completely. Kremer’s answer was exactly what it should have been. The question itself was stupid and leading. They need better writers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HowAboutThat said:

That goes without saying, the players are smarter than we are and have strong ideas about what should be done, especially when what IS being done is failing so badly.

The main reason this season has been a disappointment is because of my expectations.

 

On / 12 they are 1.5 games out of first place and the number 1 WC. That's not necessarily what I would call failing badly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why do folks always have to cry about payroll?

The O's had the top farm in the game, they shouldn't have to resort to the depths they have to find guys that can stand on second base with a glove on their hand.

Part of building a team is building depth.  The O's have traded a lot of that position player depth to fill the holes in their pitching staff generated by their draft strategy.

You are correct. The draft strategy is bad. It might have been defensible, but it isn’t now, and yet, even in the ‘24 draft, Elias didn’t change, and his top draft pick was a guy who does everything except hit…which is the most important thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why do folks always have to cry about payroll?

The O's had the top farm in the game, they shouldn't have to resort to the depths they have to find guys that can stand on second base with a glove on their hand.

Part of building a team is building depth.  The O's have traded a lot of that position player depth to fill the holes in their pitching staff generated by their draft strategy.

You are correct. The draft strategy is bad. It might have been defensible, but it isn’t now, and yet, even in the ‘24 draft, Elias didn’t change, and his top draft pick was a guy who does everything except hit…which is the most important thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ledzepp8 said:

What does this even mean? You note that we have replacements that aren’t as good, admit that it’s not Hyde’s fault, then blame him for the mistakes that arise from them being substandard players. 

The embarrassing play FROM THE REGULARS. The subs are subs, and will be gone soon. When superstars play like crap, and they are definitely playing like crap, and they themselves know it, something is going on, and the manager is the most likely guy to deal with whatever is wrong. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

One example of his over-reliance on L/R is how he did and does platoon guys like Westburg, Mayo, and Urias. They all hit RH pitching better than LH but he was very stubborn on making them part of a platoon situation. The results have been good this year for PH but I’m more interested in process than results with a SSS. 

Platooning Westburg????   He played in 101 of 109 games before getting hurt.   He was never platooned, unless your definition of platooning is giving a guy an occasional day off in the long grind of a season.

Platooning Mayo?   He has 10 starts.   6 vs RHP, 4 vs LHP.

Absolute nonsense.

Also don't forget that just because a player may not show a platoon advantage vs the other side, or even has slight "backwards splits",  often the pitcher does have an extreme platoon disadvantage, so even if the player is platoon neutral it or slightly backwards, could STILL be the correct move to get the bat in against the pitcher who gets hit hard by righties..

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...