Jump to content

Another 9 game stretch


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

The last 9 game stretch was a complete failure. The Os went 5-4 in a stretch where 6-3 was the absolute minimum they should do.

Now we have 6 against Det and 3 against the Giants. 

As we all focus on the NY series, the games played between now and are every bit and perhaps more important.

As of now, we miss Skubal..but we get Snell and Webb.

Detroit is playing better and still has a shot at the playoffs, so it won’t be easy. They can pitch well. 

SF is a mediocre pitching team.

Both teams are below average offensively.

The Yankees play 10 games in this stretch. That starts tonight, as they play 4 vs Boston at home. Then they go out west to play Seattle and Oakland before coming back to play us.

I doubt the Yankees do better than 6-4 in that stretch. Can the Os win 6 or more games?  With the way they are playing, probably not but the most difficult are likely this weekend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

Outside of message board banter it's become impossible to try and predict what this team will do in any given stretch.

 

Even with the injuries, it's fair to say that they've left some wins on the table. Hopefully they can win 6 of these games. 

I don't think it's impossible at all.  They've been bouncing around .500 for 3 months now.  They will either go 5-4 or 4-5 lol.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about starting a similar thread. There's a nice continuity to this stretch-- nine games against the only two teams we haven't faced yet, two .500-ish teams with just ok offenses and some nice pitching. (The Tigers pitching is better overall, but if we miss Skubal and face Snell/Webb, the Giants series is maybe tougher.) And the results of this stretch will set the tone and stakes for the Yankees series. 

All three series are winnable. I really want to see three 2-1 series wins. What I predict is that we win both Tigers series but lose the Giants series for a 5-4 stretch overall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As soon as you stop worrying about winning the division, the better off you’ll feel about this season. Once we split with the Astros, took 1 from the Dodgers and realized we wouldn’t be losing 7 in a row (8 counting the Mets finale), I exhaled a bit. All that matters is getting the IL guys healthy enough so they can contribute again, ideally with some time before the postseason to shake off the rust. Whatever this team is doing now doesn’t matter and the schedule is very friendly to the WC teams this year with the extra days off. If we don’t get the IL guys back in time, it won’t matter if we get the bye or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

My goal for this 9 game stretch is to clinch a playoff spot by the time it’s over, and leave ourselves with a realistic shot at a division title.   

Agreed. I don’t really want to go all out to have to win games in the last series. I want to get guys rested (maybe Adley doesn’t play any game that series), get the pitching lined up and get the injured guys some more Ml time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...