Jump to content

Your Thoughts on MLB Draft Format?


Recommended Posts

I know we have another day of drafting. But I just wanted to get everyones take on how you felt the new draft format went. With the 6pm start time and the MLB Network covering the draft in their studio? Plus also knocking out three rounds tonight. Is it more beneficial for MLB to promote the draft this way? Or did it hurt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish they would go to the idea of trading picks, having a true slot and drafting Int'l players.

You do that, televise the first 2 rounds and really build it up, the draft could become a lot of fun.

ESPN shows the CWS and a lot of the games leading up to it...MLB should be doing this with ESPN and promote these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you ask me, if you can't trade your pick, they can cut the interval between picks even shorter.

Yea. 4 minutes is way to long. 1 minute is all they should need. As prepared as these teams are they probably only need like 30 seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's okay, but there are some serious issues that prevent it from being an "event" like the NFL/NBA draft:

1) The players being drafted aren't household names, the way high school/college basketball players and college football players are.

2) The players aren't going to be joining their club for a couple years. That's a lot of delayed gratification to ask of a viewer.

3) The whole slotting system is weak, and more-so than either the NBA or the NFL, it is not a foregone conclusion that these players are going to even sign.

4) Again, since the slotting system is weak, so even if your team finished with one of the worst records, you are not assured any solace through the draft, because your team might be making their pick based on "signability" and cost. So the sense of "justice" and fairness that makes the other drafts so great, isn't present here.

5) And finally, there is no trading of picks. This eliminates much of the drama. It also makes it so that GMs aren't very secretive about the picks, so the first 10 picks (this year) are made public before the draft even starts.

For these reasons, the MLB draft isn't really an event, and I'm not sure it can work on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea. 4 minutes is way to long. 1 minute is all they should need. As prepared as these teams are they probably only need like 30 seconds.

And why did they have to take the full 4 minutes before announcing the pick? Just seemed like they wasted a lot of time by spending it all, when clearly the Nationals were going to take Strasburg.

Agree with the trading of picks.

And, did anyone find Bud Selig just flat-out dull and annoying? He just seemed like he didn't want to be there at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they should shorten the time for the picks just for TV purposes. Maybe a guy falls a team didn't know was going to fall so they have to have a quick discussion... no harm in that.

It'll never be as big a spectacle as the nfl/nba draft but it was still interseting to see who the O's picked and get a quick video of him and hear the analysts talk about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the draft until the O's game came on, cursed the Hobgood selection vociferously (until I read Tony's post explaining that his velocity is reportedly a lot higher than previously reported) and then watched in between innings. It was entertaining and I think they should keep the entire first-day telecast on MLB TV, rather than switching to on-line only after the first round.

The one gripe I had was a lack of visual information. Most of the time I watched, there wasn't a crawl showing which players had already been picked, and only rarely were there lists showing best players available. ESPN shows this information constantly during the NFL draft, for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What time the draft start today? I can't seem to find it anywhere.

It starts at noon I think.

I liked the format. There was perhaps too much time between picks, but as someone who isn't quite as familiar with all the names (well I knew a good deal about the first few guys picked thanks to the OH) I liked having some analysis and video to watch.

Maybe it will grow over time as more baseball fans become increasingly aware of it and pay more attention to the development of players. I have no data to back that up, it just seems to me that in general there is loads more info available about prospects and minor league systems, so maybe more people will get interested.

It might help to have the players there, too -- who was there last night, Trout? It's always exciting and makes for good t.v. to see a kid get selected , family and friends congratulating him, go up to the podium to be introduced, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The time between picks was really only for the TV coverage so the analysts could talk about the players.

Until a couple fo years ago, I think it was less than a minute between picks when they did it by conference call.

I didn't mind the fact that it started at 6 pm, but I wish they still let ESPN broadcast it like last year so we get some ACTUAL HONEST reactions about each pick. I got the feeling the MLB guys weren't going to argue with any team's pick because they are paid by MLB to say good things about them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The draft should start no later than 3:00 PM (eastern time). They should televise the entire first day. I agree with the other poster who said they should have video footage. I think they should have video footage from the Top 200 Prospects. They should have live cameras with players and agents who are believed to be Top 10 picks and telephone interviews with players, coaches and agent/advisors throughout the first day.

Oh yeah, have someone other than Bud Selig introduce the picks. Selig has to be the most boring person alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we have another day of drafting. But I just wanted to get everyones take on how you felt the new draft format went. With the 6pm start time and the MLB Network covering the draft in their studio? Plus also knocking out three rounds tonight. Is it more beneficial for MLB to promote the draft this way? Or did it hurt?

I liked it actually. It will get more interesting when they go to a hard rookie cap in 2 years. That will be one of the adamant points of the owners in the next CBA, that the slot system become mandatory and not a suggestion. It's a way to circumvent the entire arbitration system right now, as kids can get more in bonus money than they would make their first 3 under team control years if they just hold out for it, and the kids don't have anything to lose by just not signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • For me, bullpen strategy in a short series is developing a core principle or two and working backwards from that. That’s usually going to involve how we want to pitch to their best guys. In this case, there’s really no way to game Witt. He doesn’t have any discernible platoon splits, and in fact he destroyed RHPs this year. He doesn’t even have any particular pitches he struggles against. If you have to pitch to him, power stuff seems to be the way to go — if he has any weakness, it seems like maybe it’s LHPs who can attack him with high velocity and some sort of off speed weapon (Skubal, Framber, Kikuchi, EdRod, Rodon, Sale, Gore). So maybe you’re looking at Soto and Perez there, although you really just shouldn’t be pitching to him at all if you can avoid it. Beyond him, the other “hero” is Salvador Perez. And that’s from where I’d be building out my strategy. He probably should not see a LHP all series. There’s a fairly meaningful career platoon split there (109 wRC+ to 101), and it’s been more pronounced this year (130 to 110). I would be looking to force feed him ABs against Cano (1/4 with a single), Webb (0/2 with two Ks), and Dominguez. He’s always had trouble with offspeed stuff, which means Webb might be the preferred option. They’ve faced a ton of LH starters in the last week or so, but it seems like their preferred lineup against RHPs stacks LH hitters like Melendez and Gurriel behind Perez. Melendez is awful against LHPs, so ideally Perez might be the last hitter that the starters see. They pinch hit very liberally in platoon fashion in the bottom half of the lineup, so if you brought in someone like Akin behind the starter, they might very well hit for him. Forcing them to do that erases a lot of the platoon stacking in the late innings, so you could subsequently bring in a RHP to pitch to Perez without the same concern that they’d be exposed after him.    In sum, I think the ideal attack plan is for Burnes/Eflin/Kremer to see Perez three times, then bring in Akin or Cionel to pitch to the bottom of what will likely be a lefty-heavy lineup. They’ll potentially PH there, but that’s okay because none of those guys are that good. You then go to one of the RHPs for the top of the lineup, which it seems will consist of Pham, Witt (pitch around), and Perez. Then back to Coulombe or Soto for the bottom of the lineup again.
    • I have two tickets to Game 1 of the WC which I cannot use due to work travel.  Section 352, row 4, seats 9 & 10.  Asking $70 total for the two.  Paid $205 to the Orioles as a season plan member.   PM me if interested.  Paypal preferred.    
    • Can't make game 1. I'll be at game 2...last time I was at a playoff game at Camden, we beat Scherzer and the Tigers.
    • He should be taking fly balls all winter.
    • That was a lot of fun. Felt like there are certain elite seasons that had to be part of the team, and then tried to build from there.  Outfield depth is a little shaky, as is the rotation — though the latter is probably mostly unavoidable. The lineup would rake and the bullpen would shove, so pretty happy with this combination.   C 2022 Adley Rutschman (5.4 rWAR) 1B: 1998 Rafael Palmeiro (6.3) 2B: 2005 Brian Roberts (7.3) 3B: 2015 Manny Machado (7.5) SS: 2024 Gunnar Henderson (8.9) LF: 1999 Brady Anderson (5.9) CF: 2021 Cedric Mullins (5.9) RF: 2008 Nick Markakis (7.4) DH: 2013 Chris Davis (7.1) Bench: 2003 Melvin Mora (4.7) Bench: 2006 Miguel Tejada (4.5) Bench: 2011 Matt Wieters (5.2) Bench: 2001 Jeff Conine (2.9)   SP: 2000 Mike Mussina (5.7) SP: 2007 Erik Bedard (5.7) SP: 2019 John Means (4.4) SP: 2002 Rodrigo Lopez (3.7) SP: 2010 Jeremy Guthrie (4.5) RP: 2016 Zach Britton (4.1) RP: 2023 Felix Bautista (3.0) RP: 2004 B.J. Ryan (3.4) RP: 2012 Jim Johnson (2.4) RP: 2014 Darren O’Day (2.4) RP: 2017 Brad Brach (1.2) RP: 2009 George Sherrill (1.7) RP: 2018 Richard Bleier (1.5)
    • Gray started off well  but then ran out of steam a bit. He's not getting any younger. I was interested in him last year but I think the Cardinals overpaid and his contract only gets worse. 
    • A bit. Nothing life changing, but the format seems…Cleaner.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...