Jump to content

Jeffress suspended 100 games


TakebackOPACY

Recommended Posts

Was Ponson suspended by the league for drinking? Not that I know of.

How would you like it if your boss saw you after work speeding or running a red light and then decided to suspend you without pay because of it?

The difference here is that speeding and running red lights don't carry the huge negative stigma that smoking marijuana does. Alcohol also isn't listed under banned substances by MLB, so they couldn't suspend him for it.

The difference here is that nobody would release a prospect with the talent of Jeffress, but teams would be more than happy to release Ponson with the way he was pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I agree with that sentiment 100%. He knew the rules when he signed the contract. He's definitely the idiot here, I just also think its stupid that they even bother to test for this, and suspend people for it but don't do a damn thing about players who get DUIs which is a far more heinous transgression.

I agree. Considering the Angels lost one of their best pitchers because someone was driving drunk, MLB should be a little tougher on the issue. The same thing could happen when anyone drives drunk. There should be a similar system put in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference here is that speeding and running red lights don't carry the huge negative stigma that smoking marijuana was. Alcohol also isn't listed under banned substances by MLB, so they couldn't suspend him for it.

The difference here is that nobody would release a prospect with the talent of Jeffress, but teams would be more than happy to release Ponson with the way he was pitching.

Who has the "huge negative stigma that smoking marijuana" besides old white guys?

The general public thinks it should be legalize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who has the "huge negative stigma that smoking marijuana" besides old white guys?

The general public thinks it should be legalize.

That's irrelevant. Marijuana remains illegal and MLB established the principle back in the seventies that players would be suspended for substance abuse.

Personally, I don't believe that society should waste law enforcement resources attempting to prevent people from killing themselves with mood enhancing substances, but I do believe that society has an obligation to enforce the laws currently on the books until they can be removed. The same applies to baseball; they need to enforce their rules or change them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who has the "huge negative stigma that smoking marijuana" besides old white guys?

The general public thinks it should be legalize.

Eh, I'm a proponent for legalization, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that "then general public" thinks it should be legalized. If that were the case, it probably would have more footing for legalization.

And until it is, it is illegal, and it is illegal in the league by their specific rules. He gets caught, he's gotta take that punch. He made his bed now he has to lay down on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is pretty easy, you can get those kits online. But you need several hours notice. If it's a surprise test you're screwed.

Unless you get the Wizinator. That my friends is the best way to pay any test. I have heard many different things to drink to pass the test, asprin, cranberry juice, vinegar, just to name a few.....But regardless, if I ever got to play the game I love as a job and got paid for it, Id quit that instant!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I'm a proponent for legalization, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that "then general public" thinks it should be legalized. If that were the case, it probably would have more footing for legalization.

And until it is, it is illegal, and it is illegal in the league by their specific rules. He gets caught, he's gotta take that punch. He made his bed now he has to lay down on it.

Well said Wedge. I don't do it, but I couldn't care less if someone smokes weed. But I don't think the majority of America agrees with me at this point. But that is irrelevant.

For right now, and in the forseeable future, it is illegal. He broke the law. Maybe when someone has so much on the line and knows the likelihood of being tested, they should put the weed down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said Wedge. I don't do it, but I couldn't care less if someone smokes weed. But I don't think the majority of America agrees with me at this point. But that is irrelevant.

For right now, and in the forseeable future, it is illegal. He broke the law. Maybe when someone has so much on the line and knows the likelihood of being tested, they should put the weed down.

If the economy would have kept sinking at the rate it was in the winter, weed may have been legalized to help stimulate the economy. It probably would have helped, but the tax probably would have forced many users to stick with their illegal suppliers rather than the more expensive taxed government weed....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I'm a proponent for legalization, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that "then general public" thinks it should be legalized. If that were the case, it probably would have more footing for legalization.

And until it is, it is illegal, and it is illegal in the league by their specific rules. He gets caught, he's gotta take that punch. He made his bed now he has to lay down on it.

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/590/california_marijuana_legalization_initiative

There is a good chance California is going to be the first state to legalize it.

I believe the polls are something like 70% of Americans believe medical marijuana should be legalized and 42% of Americans believe it should be legalized nationwide.

I think those polling numbers would actually be a landslide to legalizing it.....if the public was told the truth about the drug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the economy would have kept sinking at the rate it was in the winter, weed may have been legalized to help stimulate the economy. It probably would have helped, but the tax probably would have forced many users to stick with their illegal suppliers rather than the more expensive taxed government weed....

Government Weed would be way cheaper than the illegal suppliers. It would cut off a large revenue stream to gangs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/590/california_marijuana_legalization_initiative

There is a good chance California is going to be the first state to legalize it.

I believe the polls are something like 70% of Americans believe medical marijuana should be legalized and 42% of Americans believe it should be legalized nationwide.

I think those polling numbers would actually be a landslide to legalizing it.....if the public was told the truth about the drug.

Well, that would be nice, but to nitpick that, of course 70% back medical marijuana. I bet if you put medical in front of any narcotic and gave convincing medical arguments, you'd get about 2/3 of the people to concede to legalizing it for medical reasons. But the second number is what I meant. Less than half of those asked say no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Government Weed would be way cheaper than the illegal suppliers. It would cut off a large revenue stream to gangs.

That depends upon how stupid legislators are as they structure the tax code. They've actually succeeded in putting taxes high enough on cigarettes and alcohol to make bootlegging them marginally profitable. The gangs probably wouldn't stay in that particular business, though, since most of the profit would be eliminated. There would be a lot of backyard bootlegging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who has the "huge negative stigma that smoking marijuana" besides old white guys?

The general public thinks it should be legalize.

Point being, it's illegal under U.S. law and under MLB rules. It is also widely regarded as a negative thing to use (using your numbers, more people think it should remain illegal), hence the reason it is unprofessional by MLB standards. I said nothing about legalization in any of my posts, except for the opening statement that my point in no way was meant to represent legalization or anti-legalization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that would be nice, but to nitpick that, of course 70% back medical marijuana. I bet if you put medical in front of any narcotic and gave convincing medical arguments, you'd get about 2/3 of the people to concede to legalizing it for medical reasons. But the second number is what I meant. Less than half of those asked say no.

I still think that 42% is a very large number to actually change a law. That is with a lot of the public actually thinking it is a "dangerous" drug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point being, it's illegal under U.S. law and under MLB rules. It is also widely regarded as a negative thing to use (using your numbers, more people think it should remain illegal), hence the reason it is unprofessional by MLB standards. I said nothing about legalization in any of my posts, except for the opening statement that my point in no way was meant to represent legalization or anti-legalization.

It is illegal to get a DUI. MLB doesn't suspend those players. I think a lot more people have problems with DUI than smoking weed.

I think it is stupid for MLB to test for weed and I a posters said that MLB doesn't even test for weed. It is only MiLB that test for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...