Jump to content

2010 Draft Position Race


Recommended Posts

Sorry in advance if this upsets people. I am all about winning except when they are meaningless wins and cost you the possibility of drafting people like Teix. What is the difference between finishing 2nd to last or 8th to last.

But it looks like we are solidly in 4th place for draft position next year.

Wash - 47-92

KC - 54-85

Pitt - 54-85

Balt - 56-83

Clev - 60-79

There are several of teams around 62 wins.

Seems like we could draft anywhere from 2nd to 5th, which I don't have a problem with. It would be nice to be able to pick between one of the top 2 college pitchers Pomeranz or Ranauldo. Or hopefully a SS prospects shoots up the boards. Maybe Washington passes on Harper?

I hope we don't have a Teix like debacle and end up sweeping the last weekend of the year in a meaningless series and cost us a higher pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We will end up with the 4th pick. We are bad, but we are not as bad as the Wash, KC and Pit. I have been following these teams the past few weeks to see where we will be picking. They really only win about one game per week it seems. They are really bad. I am not worried about Pit finishing ahead of us though because they always pass on premium talent (except for Alvarez that one year) for players that should be drafted late in the first (money). We will get another good player in the system. I am almost ready to officially endorse Christian Colon as my player to want this year. I have one every year. Two years ago it was Smoak and last year it was Grant Green. 0-2 so far! :scratchchinhmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will end up with the 4th pick. We are bad, but we are not as bad as the Wash, KC and Pit. I have been following these teams the past few weeks to see where we will be picking. They really only win about one game per week it seems. They are really bad. I am not worried about Pit finishing ahead of us though because they always pass on premium talent (except for Alvarez that one year) for players that should be drafted late in the first (money). We will get another good player in the system. I am almost ready to officially endorse Christian Colon as my player to want this year. I have one every year. Two years ago it was Smoak and last year it was Grant Green. 0-2 so far! :scratchchinhmm:

Would be nice to pick in front of KC. Can't believe I am watching the KC Game right now cheering for them. They seem to take the high risk guys.

Is that Brandon Wood as you moniker? That is just a sad story the way they have treated him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will end up with the 4th pick. We are bad, but we are not as bad as the Wash, KC and Pit. I have been following these teams the past few weeks to see where we will be picking. They really only win about one game per week it seems. They are really bad. I am not worried about Pit finishing ahead of us though because they always pass on premium talent (except for Alvarez that one year) for players that should be drafted late in the first (money). We will get another good player in the system. I am almost ready to officially endorse Christian Colon as my player to want this year. I have one every year. Two years ago it was Smoak and last year it was Grant Green. 0-2 so far! :scratchchinhmm:

Christian Colon looks good, but I wont be too worried about where we sit in the top 5. This year's top 5 is loaded IMO. Pomeranz, Ranaudo, Harper, Brentz, Cole, Tailon.....All these guys are premium talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christian Colon looks good, but I wont be too worried about where we sit in the top 5. This year's top 5 is loaded IMO. Pomeranz, Ranaudo, Harper, Brentz, Cole, Tailon, Harper.....All these guys are premium talent.

Wow, Harper is so good he is listed twice!!:D Or, seriously are there two Harpers that I should be paying attention to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, Ill bet we get a top 3 pick......

1: Harper

2:?

3:?

Don't be so sure that the Nationals will take Harper. Stras alone won't sell tickets. The Nationals need a draw and Harper is at least 4-5 years away. After the headache of the Stras negotiations, I expect them to take one of the big college arms with the thought they would be in the OD rotation with Stras in 2012.

Do the Pirates take Harper? I really doubt it. Sanchez this year is proof enough to me that they won't spend big on somebody, despite the Pedro Alvarez selection.

Do the Royals take Harper? It's very possible.

Do the Orioles take Harper? Answer that one definitively and ESPN will give you a job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't be so sure that the Nationals will take Harper. Stras alone won't sell tickets. The Nationals need a draw and Harper is at least 4-5 years away. After the headache of the Stras negotiations, I expect them to take one of the big college arms with the thought they would be in the OD rotation with Stras in 2012.

Do the Pirates take Harper? I really doubt it. Sanchez this year is proof enough to me that they won't spend big on somebody, despite the Pedro Alvarez selection.

Do the Royals take Harper? It's very possible.

Do the Orioles take Harper? Answer that one definitively and ESPN will give you a job.

The Nats absolutely will take Harper. They have a ton of money to spend and will always take the best player. In fact, I wouldn't be shocked if they floated the idea of Bryce taking the GED and coming out early through his brother Bryan when they drafted him. Unless Harper gets hurt or sucks big time in college, he'll be a Nat.(Assuming Pittsburgh doesn't choke beyond belief)

Even if they don't, the Royals would take him. They'll spend big on high upside players.

I think it's funny to read Oriole fans speculating on other teams passing him up when the O's took the cheaper, more signable player this year. Didn't McPhail say he wouldn't have taken Wieters?

One name I'm surprised I haven't seen talked about more for the O's is Trey Griffin. He's Avery's half brother and would probably cut a deal like Hobgood, allowing the O's to spend more on later pics and/or IFAs. I've seen him and he has a high upside IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't be so sure that the Nationals will take Harper. Stras alone won't sell tickets. The Nationals need a draw and Harper is at least 4-5 years away. After the headache of the Stras negotiations, I expect them to take one of the big college arms with the thought they would be in the OD rotation with Stras in 2012.

Do the Pirates take Harper? I really doubt it. Sanchez this year is proof enough to me that they won't spend big on somebody, despite the Pedro Alvarez selection.

Do the Royals take Harper? It's very possible.

Do the Orioles take Harper? Answer that one definitively and ESPN will give you a job.

I dont want Harper. Id rather take one of the HS arms, college arms or a college bat like Brentz.....Hes gonna cost a pretty penny though for sure. And I do see what your saying, Crow was bad enough of a ride as it was, then Strasburg was another situation that came down to the wire, so they may go the easy route. But thats too much $$ to spend on a HS kid who may end up like Rowell for all we know....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nats absolutely will take Harper. They have a ton of money to spend and will always take the best player. In fact, I wouldn't be shocked if they floated the idea of Bryce taking the GED and coming out early through his brother Bryan when they drafted him. Unless Harper gets hurt or sucks big time in college, he'll be a Nat.(Assuming Pittsburgh doesn't choke beyond belief)

Even if they don't, the Royals would take him. They'll spend big on high upside players.

I think it's funny to read Oriole fans speculating on other teams passing him up when the O's took the cheaper, more signable player this year. Didn't McPhail say he wouldn't have taken Wieters?

One name I'm surprised I haven't seen talked about more for the O's is Trey Griffin. He's Avery's half brother and would probably cut a deal like Hobgood, allowing the O's to spend more on later pics and/or IFAs. I've seen him and he has a high upside IMO.

What you have to understand though, is that the reason the O's went the route they did was because the asking prices were all premium asking prices, but the talent that was asking for the specific prices wasnt on par with the asking price. The O's will spend big bucks for a top notch 1st rounder, they just have to have close to as much abilities as asking price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you have to understand though, is that the reason the O's went the route they did was because the asking prices were all premium asking prices, but the talent that was asking for the specific prices wasnt on par with the asking price. The O's will spend big bucks for a top notch 1st rounder, they just have to have close to as much abilities as asking price.

I disagree. Jacob Turner and Tyler Matzek were worthy as HS pitchers. Both have huge upsides. If the O's had taken a college player I could buy that argument. They took a player with lower upside than some guys that went later, but still have the risk associated with taking a high schooler.

They went cheap and that's fine. I'm not attacking them for it. They used the money saved to pay overslot on several lower picks. They're going quantity over quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. Jacob Turner and Tyler Matzek were worthy as HS pitchers. Both have huge upsides. If the O's had taken a college player I could buy that argument. They took a player with lower upside than some guys that went later, but still have the risk associated with taking a high schooler.

They went cheap and that's fine. I'm not attacking them for it. They used the money saved to pay overslot on several lower picks. They're going quantity over quality.

They were asking for $6 mill. Thats what we paid for Wieters......Theres no comparison between Matzek and Wieters. The only pitcher with stuff and polish who was close to the premium price would be Matzek. apparently, Jordan saw something in Hobgood that made him believe Matzek wasnt worth $4mil more. If it were AJ Cole, the kid whose been thrown around with the names Beckett and Porcello, thats a different story, your paying that much money for a kid who may actually be worth the asking price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. Jacob Turner and Tyler Matzek were worthy as HS pitchers. Both have huge upsides. If the O's had taken a college player I could buy that argument. They took a player with lower upside than some guys that went later, but still have the risk associated with taking a high schooler.

They went cheap and that's fine. I'm not attacking them for it. They used the money saved to pay overslot on several lower picks. They're going quantity over quality.

Hobby isn't far behind Matzek, and I'd put him just about on the same level as Turner. It was more than in all of the "predictions" Hobgood wasn't expected to go until closer to 10-15, so if they thought he had as much talent as some of the kids at 5 they could get him cheaper. In the end I'm sure it was the character/intangibles that led them to take him, they have been going that direction a lot lately.

As for Harper, I wouldn't go thinking he is the slam dunk that publications make him out to be. I've seen him in person, he's good, he deserves to be talked about at the top of the first round, but he's not head and shoulders above anyone like Strasburg was. With Harper it's wait and see right now, see how he does against CC competition, see how he does with a wood bat, see how he moves as he grows and what position he will play. Lots of questions still. I would think long and hard about taking AJ Cole over him right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I mean, I don't want to denigrate your experience, but I think you're underestimating the power potential of elite athletes.  The leg strength required to send a grown man 20 mph from a dead stop is the same leg strength required to do a deadlift, or do a squat.  Can your buddy run a 4.5 40?
    • The Orioles were 30-16 in one-run games in 2023. They are 6-6 this year so far. Orioles magic hasn’t been there this year, at least so far. What changed?
    • I can’t even believe the grasping of straws going on here.  Why don’t we just bring up every guy at Norfolk who has an .800+ OPS, since they’re obviously better than their major league counterparts?  Oh wait, everyone at Norfolk has an .800+ OPS! As to Mullins, yes he’s looked awful at the plate for a month, but the O’s are nowhere near the point of regularly benching him or pinch hitting for him in key situations vs. RHP.   You know why?   Because even good players have slumps, and the best way to get them out of it is to keep playing them until they emerge from them.  And Mullins has a long enough track record where the odds of him coming out of this eventually are decent.  Not 100%, but a lot more likely than not.  I mean, the guy had an .859 OPS the first 3 weeks of the season.  That guy didn’t have some instantaneous physical decline that has turned him into the second coming of Chris Davis permanently.  I know it’s frustrating to watch him right now.  I’m as frustrated as anyone.   But every major league team would be doing what the Orioles have been doing, for another 4-6 weeks at a minimum.  
    • But it doesn't really matter if correlation implies causation, because we can at least infer that people with fast 40 times have a good chance of being able to squat 2.5x their body weight, regardless of whether there is a causative relationship.  And we have verifiable data thay many football players at skill positions are able to squat large amounts of weight that would be out of reach of many other people even given the same amount of training and diet.  So with both if these things in hand we can safely assume that these lifting numbers are achievable for most elite athletes, which Holliday qualifies as.  So I don't think we should be shocked or skeptical that he's able to pull these numbers.    I'd also be shocked if there wasn't a causative relationship between 40 times and lifting heavy.  Lifting large amounts of weight requires powerful muscles in the legs.  Running really fast also requires powerful muscles in the legs.  You can get in the weeds about muscle fiber type but to me if you're good at one, there's a great chance thay you're at least moderately good at the other.
    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...