Jump to content

Why are the D'back winning?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I have been researching the D'back as a model team for player development and I have come across a question I can't answer. Why are they winning? They are 14th in the NL in runs, 12th in errors, and 6th in pitching. Yet they are tied with the Mets of the most wins.

Can anyone explain this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because they have a pretty solid bullpen that doesn't blow leads consistently every night. They hang on and win the 4-3 and 8-7 games. That's pretty much how you can sum it up.

You could also say they are playing over their heads still, could it last all the way though October? Probably not, but they are still playing well, but they shouldn't. Example of that is the Orioles in the first half of 2005.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been researching the D'back as a model team for player development and I have come across a question I can't answer. Why are they winning? They are 14th in the NL in runs, 12th in errors, and 6th in pitching. Yet they are tied with the Mets of the most wins.

Can anyone explain this?

Sure!

Luck trumps performance in the short run; performance trumps luck over the long haul.

When teams are comparatively equal, a whole season can be a short run of luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • the question isn’t about being able to make the offers, it’s about being awarded compensatory picks for more than one.
    • I don’t consider a 4 o’clock game a night game. He also caught Wednesday night and Thursday day this week. Moral of the story is McCann will start 4 games in 7 days because he is Burnes preferred catcher.
    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...