Jump to content

Crowley likes Aubrey


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Aubrey is exactly the kind of player who would get exploited after he becomes a full-time player. How familiar were pitchers with him when they faced him last September? Were there even any scouting reports out on him?

Yeah this is the most likely scenario. He's just taken advantage of not being well known like many minor leaguers when they come up. It would be a nice story and a low cost productive player if it worked out. But realistically he's the next LH if they play his with regularity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He shouldn't even be allowed to compete for it.

He isn't good.

Scott should be the first baseman.

Aubrey can make the team if he shows he can be a good bench player..be a late inning defensive replacement for Scott and spot starter...That's fine.

But nothing more than that.

Aubrey shouldn't even make the team on the bench as you will already have Wigginton there, and all Aubrey can play is 1B/DH.

Scott Moore should make the team over Aubrey due to his ability to play both corners and the OF.

I don't mind Scott at 1B, but I just don't see DT playing him there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aubrey shouldn't even make the team on the bench as you will already have Wigginton there, and all Aubrey can play is 1B/DH.

Scott Moore should make the team over Aubrey due to his ability to play both corners and the OF.

I don't mind Scott at 1B, but I just don't see DT playing him there.

I do agree with this...Good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He shouldn't even be allowed to compete for it.He isn't good.

Scott should be the first baseman.

Aubrey can make the team if he shows he can be a good bench player..be a late inning defensive replacement for Scott and spot starter...That's fine.

But nothing more than that.

Wow, did he run over your dog or something? I mean I'm all for all the competition we can get for that spot that is currently being taken up by a folding chair with a glove on it. We have no first basemen (I mean I guess other than Wigginton). Why should he not be allowed to compete?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to put Aubrey down.

I have to ask when the last time a coach ever said, "Oh No! That guy couldn't get on base to save his life. He has no defensive skills whatsoever." Or something to that effect?

I think writers go looking for a story just like everyone here does. Personally I think he is an emergency depth signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, did he run over your dog or something? I mean I'm all for all the competition we can get for that spot that is currently being taken up by a folding chair with a glove on it. We have no first basemen (I mean I guess other than Wigginton). Why should he not be allowed to compete?

Because he gives us nothing.

They say they don't have a market for Scott..Fine...You create one..You put him at first and let him build his value there...And, it allows you to play Pie everyday in LF(well against righties and a few lefties), which could also improve his value and likely make us a better team overall.

If Aubrey is the starter, then Scott is DH'ing and Pie is on the bench.

In that scenario, you are hurting the value of Scott and Pie and playing a scrub everyday at first.

In other words, it is a no win scenario for the Orioles now and in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aubrey shouldn't even make the team on the bench as you will already have Wigginton there, and all Aubrey can play is 1B/DH.

Scott Moore should make the team over Aubrey due to his ability to play both corners and the OF.

I don't mind Scott at 1B, but I just don't see DT playing him there.

But does he play them well? Not really, accoding to his minor league fielding percentage, and I know thats not a really good gauge but I was just looking up quick stats. Also Aubrey has a better minor league (and major league) OPS. I'm not really pro-Aubrey, but the Scott Moore love some people have is absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because he gives us nothing.

They say they don't have a market for Scott..Fine...You create one..You put him at first and let him build his value there...And, it allows you to play Pie everyday in LF(well against righties and a few lefties), which could also improve his value and likely make us a better team overall.

If Aubrey is the starter, then Scott is DH'ing and Pie is on the bench.

In that scenario, you are hurting the value of Scott and Pie and playing a scrub everyday at first.

In other words, it is a no win scenario for the Orioles now and in the future.

I'm not disagreeing with your points about Scott, I think he should get a shot to be our starting first basemen, however it doesnt seem the organization is on board with that. I'm just saying that if it comes down to Wigginton, Aubrey, Hughes and Snyder competing for th spot at 1B in spring, why should Aubrey not be allowed to compete for the spot? Again, I'm not disagreeing with your ideas about Scott, Pie, etc. and I'm not a huge Aubrey fan, but I dont really get why some dont even think he should get the chance to fight for the spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extrapolate the numbers out and you get some productivity. I know why don't we trade some of our young studs or potential studs for Smoak like some want to do. All Aubrey did was hit and get on base but that to some is not good enough, and he plays a good 1st base but that is still not good enough for some on these threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extrapolate the numbers out and you get some productivity. I know why don't we trade some of our young studs or potential studs for Smoak like some want to do. All Aubrey did was hit and get on base but that to some is not good enough, and he plays a good 1st base but that is still not good enough for some on these threads.

His 90 AB's were good last year. But his past 700 in the minors haven't been. At least not for 1B production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extrapolate the numbers out and you get some productivity. I know why don't we trade some of our young studs or potential studs for Smoak like some want to do. All Aubrey did was hit and get on base but that to some is not good enough, and he plays a good 1st base but that is still not good enough for some on these threads.

Aubrey is projected by CHONE to be worse than replacement level this season.

And his OBP and SLG have been nothing to write home about.

There are better solutions out there than Aubrey at 1B, and it's up to MacPhail to exhaust every opportunity before putting him there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not disagreeing with your points about Scott, I think he should get a shot to be our starting first basemen, however it doesnt seem the organization is on board with that. I'm just saying that if it comes down to Wigginton, Aubrey, Hughes and Snyder competing for th spot at 1B in spring, why should Aubrey not be allowed to compete for the spot? Again, I'm not disagreeing with your ideas about Scott, Pie, etc. and I'm not a huge Aubrey fan, but I dont really get why some dont even think he should get the chance to fight for the spot.

He shouldn't get the chance because Scott should be the first baseman.

If the Orioles are dumb enough not do that(as the team is currently constructed), then I guess he should compete for the job with the other horrendous options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aubrey is projected by CHONE to be worse than replacement level this season.

And his OBP and SLG have been nothing to write home about.

There are better solutions out there than Aubrey at 1B, and it's up to MacPhail to exhaust every opportunity before putting him there.

Your right. Better internal and external solutions to Aubrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...