Jump to content

Chipper Jones may retire after 2010


backwardsk

Recommended Posts

That's absurd.

Depends on how much you value defense. Let's be honest, Brooks wasn't exactly an offensive powerhouse. Defensively, he was as good as it gets. That seems kind of reasonable to me, as I could think of an argument for 56 position players being better than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on how much you value defense. Let's be honest, Brooks wasn't exactly an offensive powerhouse. Defensively, he was as good as it gets. That seems kind of reasonable to me, as I could think of an argument for 56 position players being better than him.

Well WAR obviously factors defense in quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well WAR obviously factors defense in quite a bit.

Just asking here, b/c I'm not sure, but does the defensive factor in WAR for historic players take into account everything that UZR does? Do they actually go back and look at every play to see if it was in his "zone?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just asking here, b/c I'm not sure, but does the defensive factor in WAR for historic players take into account everything that UZR does? Do they actually go back and look at every play to see if it was in his "zone?"
TZ- TotalZone, a measure of defensive range based on analysis of retrosheet play by play data. For seaons before 1953, and the 1953 American League, This measure is based on a much cruder formula called JAARF (Just another adjusted range factor.) which estimates defensive ratings from assists, putouts and errors, as well as team hits allowed by lefthanded and righthanded pitchers.

Robinson has a 268 TZ for his career, which may be the highest of any player, I'm not sure if there's a way to sort that somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robinson has a 268 TZ for his career, which may be the highest of any player, I'm not sure if there's a way to sort that somewhere.

What exactly is "retrosheet play by play data?" It seems like this doesn't encompass everything that UZR does. Not saying the rankings aren't accurate (although, aren't almost all of the arguments about which player is better subjective), but maybe with more complete data his ranking would be different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly is "retrosheet play by play data?" It seems like this doesn't encompass everything that UZR does. Not saying the rankings aren't accurate (although, aren't almost all of the arguments about which player is better subjective), but maybe with more complete data his ranking would be different.

I'm not sure how accurate it is, maybe Drungo or 1970 or someone can enlighten us. However, I doubt his ranking would be much better, he's already being credited with absolutely amazing defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...