Jump to content

Strasburg's debut


backwardsk

Recommended Posts

Stephen Strasburg made his debut with the Nats this afternoon and tossed 2 scoreless innings.

On the drive home, they had the pitching coach for the Nationals on. He was asked what the timetable for Strasburg to reach the majors was. He said that if it has been decided by management, it hasn't been relayed to him or Riggleman. He made it sound like the Opening Day roster wasn't out of the question. I seriously doubt that would happen, but I was surprised that he didn't flat out rule it out.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AualbXQLCNxU7p_BIA0giCc5nYcB?slug=ap-nationals-strasburgsdebut&prov=ap&type=lgns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldn't surprise me to see him on the opening day roster. The Nationals are desperate to put fans in the seats and having Strasburg on the team guarantees that happening every 5th day....at least until the novelty wears off, or he gets his socks knocked off by ML hitters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldn't surprise me to see him on the opening day roster. The Nationals are desperate to put fans in the seats and having Strasburg on the team guarantees that happening every 5th day....at least until the novelty wears off, or he gets his socks knocked off by ML hitters.

The amount of money from a few sellouts < the money saved by getting him for another year and even more money will be saved if they hold him back from super 2 status.

Also keep in mind he was up and down in the AFL, I think it would serve him well in the long run to spend the first half of the season in the minors even if he dominates. It will also be easier for the Nats to keep a tight handle on his innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their fans should revolt if they put him on the Opening Day roster, that'd be an incredibly stupid decision. Leave him down for 2, maybe 3 starts max, and you get an entire extra year of service time. I know the novelty and desire to see him is huge, and I bet he's pretty much ready right now, but 7 years minus 2-3 starts is definitely much better than 6 years. Especially when you've got a Boras client who will almost certainly not extend (and he's a pitcher anyway, so the risk is higher even if you could extend him, go the arb route and get 7 years control, not 6).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the highlights, and he looked awesome. He's the best pitcher the Nats have right now. But I'd still keep him in the minors until Memorial Day to gain an extra year of service and avoid Super-2 status. It's not like the Nats are going to contend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two scoreless innings is what you would expect out of him. It sure would be nice to see our top guys able to do that.:( (At least one of them anyway!)

Wait a minute. I thought spring training games were irrelevant? I thought it was better to get slumps out of the way before the season started? Boy the lack of consistency and hypocrisy is shocking to no one and staggering to all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait a minute. I thought spring training games were irrelevant? I thought it was better to get slumps out of the way before the season started? Boy the lack of consistency and hypocrisy is shocking to no one and staggering to all.

I don't know how many times I have pointed this out but I was speaking of the VETERANS getting their slumps and bad pitching out of the way. I also clearly said that prospects or guys trying to make the team need to do well, as they aren't experimenting or working on new things like some of the veterans are doing (especially pitchers).

To give you an example, I am fine with seeing Millwood get lit up in ST as he is tinkering around but I don't want to see the same thing from Matusz, Tillman, Arrieta, Bergenson, Hernandez, Mickolio, etc. They should be making a good impression not a Hayden Penn impersonation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how many times I have pointed this out but I was speaking of the VETERANS getting their slumps and bad pitching out of the way. I also clearly said that prospects or guys trying to make the team need to do well, as they aren't experimenting or working on new things like some of the veterans are doing (especially pitchers).[/QUOTE]

Then why was Tillman only using two pitches in his first outing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how many times I have pointed this out but I was speaking of the VETERANS getting their slumps and bad pitching out of the way. I also clearly said that prospects or guys trying to make the team need to do well, as they aren't experimenting or working on new things like some of the veterans are doing (especially pitchers).[/QUOTE]

Then why was Tillman only using two pitches in his first outing?

I have no idea why he was only using two pitches in his first outing. Maybe he was told to do so by Kranitz. Maybe the weather had something to do with it. There are all sorts of reasons. Sometimes when a pitcher warms up he may have only two that are working that day or he feels comfortable with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea why he was only using two pitches in his first outing. Maybe he was told to do so by Kranitz. Maybe the weather had something to do with it. There are all sorts of reasons. Sometimes when a pitcher warms up he may have only two that are working that day or he feels comfortable with.

Or they wanted him to work on his fastball location and didn't want him to rely on his full arsenal to get out of jams. In other words, he's working on things, just like Guthrie when he only used his slider once against the Red Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or they wanted him to work on his fastball location and didn't want him to rely on his full arsenal to get out of jams. In other words, he's working on things, just like Guthrie when he only used his slider once against the Red Sox.

Maybe, but your guess that he is doing that isn't any more likely to be right than any number of reasons as I have shown (and there are more than that even).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...