Jump to content

Blame MacPhail


JTrea81

Recommended Posts

I think it's kind of amazing how people equate spending money on free agents directly with winning.

Like it's not possible to win without high priced free agents.

It's not possible to win without premium talent.

As I've stated, they don't necessarily have to be paid like $20 million per season/$100 million+ contract players, but they have to produce like one would.

Right now the Orioles do not have that type of positional player, yet. And they won't be winning anything until they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 294
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think the point was that there hasn't been much difference between them THIS year (thus far).

Since this thread was started obviously as a reaction to the 1-11 start, you have to take into consideration that even if we had signed Matt Holiday, it's not unlikely that we would have started...1-11. Thus leading to the same knee jerk reactions, and yet we would have done exactly what the OP was asking.

If we had Holliday's offense, I think we would have won at least 1 or 2 more games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not possible to win without premium talent.

As I've stated, they don't necessarily have to be paid like $20 million per season/$100 million+ contract players, but they have to produce like one would.

Right now the Orioles do not have that type of positional player, yet. And they won't be winning anything until they do.

The Orioles need to be going after the young premium guys that aren't established...Push for Smoak or someone along those lines...would much rather overpay for a guy like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles need to be going after the young premium guys that aren't established...Push for Smoak or someone along those lines...would much rather overpay for a guy like that.

I'd love to see that, but it's going to take trading Chris Tillman and/or Jake Arrieta to do that.

Maybe not both, but teams value their young positional players more that they used to.

The key was to draft it, and the Orioles failed to do that, choosing HS players instead that are at least 3-4 years away.

After Wieters, they dropped the ball on drafting young ML ready positional talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles need to be going after the young premium guys that aren't established...Push for Smoak or someone along those lines...would much rather overpay for a guy like that.
Smoak being a premium guy is very much in doubt though. Paying for established guys through free agency is sometimes better. Depends on what you'd have to give up for Smoak and what you think he'll become. Both approaches have their risks.

I really want us to go hard after Pena in the offseason. I think he'd be a near perfect addition, and his slightly older age should keep him limited to a 4-5 year deal at absolute max, maybe as short as 3 years. And, we wouldn't have to wait for him to adjust like we may with a younger player (or going with Snyder). It may have some negative implications on the back end, but I think we should be close enough to contending next year that the addition of Pena is felt immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see that, but it's going to take trading Chris Tillman and/or Jake Arrieta to do that.

Maybe not both, but teams value their young positional players more that they used to.

The key was to draft it, and the Orioles failed to do that, choosing HS players instead that are at least 3-4 years away.

After Wieters, they dropped the ball on drafting young ML ready positional talent.

And that's a deal we need to make IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smoak being a premium guy is very much in doubt though. Paying for established guys through free agency is sometimes better. Depends on what you'd have to give up for Smoak and what you think he'll become. Both approaches have their risks.

I really want us to go hard after Pena in the offseason. I think he'd be a near perfect addition, and his slightly older age should keep him limited to a 4-5 year deal at absolute max, maybe as short as 3 years. And, we wouldn't have to wait for him to adjust like we may with a younger player (or going with Snyder). It may have some negative implications on the back end, but I think we should be close enough to contending next year that the addition of Pena is felt immediately.

Maybe in your mind....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see that, but it's going to take trading Chris Tillman and/or Jake Arrieta to do that.

Maybe not both, but teams value their young positional players more that they used to.

The only pitcher in the minor league system I would not move for Smoak is Zach Britton. I'd trade Tillman and Erbe today for him, but would much prefer sending Tillman and Snyder for him. I doubt they'd do it, but I would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smoak being a premium guy is very much in doubt though. Paying for established guys through free agency is sometimes better. Depends on what you'd have to give up for Smoak and what you think he'll become. Both approaches have their risks.

I really want us to go hard after Pena in the offseason. I think he'd be a near perfect addition, and his slightly older age should keep him limited to a 4-5 year deal at absolute max, maybe as short as 3 years. And, we wouldn't have to wait for him to adjust like we may with a younger player (or going with Snyder). It may have some negative implications on the back end, but I think we should be close enough to contending next year that the addition of Pena is felt immediately.

I understand what you are saying, and I'm not against going after Pena at all next off season, but if Smoak was available, he's a guy the Orioles should covet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only pitcher in the minor league system I would not move for Smoak is Zach Britton. I'd trade Tillman and Erbe today for him, but would much prefer sending Tillman and Snyder for him. I doubt they'd do it, but I would.

Now that he's caught fire, I doubt the Rangers move Smoak for anybody less than Matusz himself.

He is going to be their new Teixeira.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW with Pie's injury, and Reimold's gimpyness, Matt Holliday looks a lot better now doesn't he?

That's why you don't wait for the perfect fit because things will work out.

You need to acquire talent when you can get it.

We may have to pursue Jayson Werth this offseason now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...