Jump to content

ARod's declining value


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Per fangraphs:

2007 - $37.7 mm (signed extension after the season)

2008 - $27.2 mm

2009 - $20.3 mm

2010 - $15.4 mm

He still has 7 years, $180 mm ($25.7 mm per year average) left on his deal. I'm sure the Yankees aren't regretting it yet, even though he's been paid $91 mm the last 3 years and has been worth only $62.9 mm. But hopefully he keeps declining and eventually becomes an albatross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per fangraphs:

2007 - $37.7 mm (signed extension after the season)

2008 - $27.2 mm

2009 - $20.3 mm

2010 - $15.4 mm

He still has 7 years, $180 mm ($25.7 mm per year average) left on his deal. I'm sure the Yankees aren't regretting it yet, even though he's been paid $91 mm the last 3 years and has been worth only $62.9 mm. But hopefully he keeps declining and eventually becomes an albatross.

The best part is he is still performing well enough to hit the escalators in his contract.

The reality is that the Yankees can afford Arod's deal, and whatever ridiculous deal CPT Jeets end up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming he can maintain about a 30 HR/season pace; he'll take Bonds down a notch on the all-time list in late 2015 The marketing of that alone will make the Yankees millions toward his salary as the milestone approaches. Stock up on the Pepto Bismol as the media champions that once again a pin-striper is the all-time HR king.

With HRs #400, #500, #600, #700 and more will ensure that his HOF cap will be a Yankees one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming he can maintain about a 30 HR/season pace; he'll take Bonds down a notch on the all-time list in late 2015 The marketing of that alone will make the Yankees millions toward his salary as the milestone approaches. Stock up on the Pepto Bismol as the media champions that once again a pin-striper is the all-time HR king.

With HRs #400, #500, #600, #700 and more will ensure that his HOF cap will be a Yankees one.

I bet there will be more talk about the home run king being a self-admitted steroids user than a Yankee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet there will be more talk about the home run king being a self-admitted steroids user than a Yankee.

I get no sense that the media has any interest in killing a story that has the potential to stay topical for at least two seasons. Especially one that a good many fans are content to rationalize on the basis of "everybody did it".

As if everybody did it, but whatever...

The story will be the chase. The steroids will be a footnote that the responsible journalists will note out of duty and quickly - very quickly - move on to the highlight reel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming he can maintain about a 30 HR/season pace; he'll take Bonds down a notch on the all-time list in late 2015 The marketing of that alone will make the Yankees millions toward his salary as the milestone approaches. Stock up on the Pepto Bismol as the media champions that once again a pin-striper is the all-time HR king.

With HRs #400, #500, #600, #700 and more will ensure that his HOF cap will be a Yankees one.

I went looking for Pepto after reading that. Ugh.

I bet there will be more talk about the home run king being a self-admitted steroids user than a Yankee.

I don't think it'll be as bad as Bonds...Bonds was so defiant up through and during the chase for #755..at least A-Rod did himself a favor and admitted it and got it out of the way early. People will still talk about it, but I don't think the controversy will be as rampant as it was for Bonds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you are in the World Series hunt year after year, and making tons of money in revenue, you can easily absorb the excessiveness of ARod contract. He is still one of the best players in the game and we'd be kidding ourselves if we really think this will be a problem for the MFY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question for you fangraph experts.

How often does a big ticket free agent actually played above the worth of his contract? Like his contract was 20 mil a year and he was 22.5 mil. Not just for one year, but lets say at least 4 out of the 6 years.

Occasionally. But it's not going to be very often. You have to consider how the Fangraphs values are calculated and how free agent contracts come about.

First off, the deck is stacked against the player earning his salary:

1) Almost all free agents are at least in their late 20s, and the average peak age is 27.

2) Teams often sign deals with an optimistic take on age-related decline.

3) The deals are almost all guaranteed money, so injuries often blow up a deal.

So teams will sign a guy like Mo Vaughn (or Ryan Howard) to a 6/80 deal at the age of 31, based on his production up to that point, and expecting a graceful decline through his late 30s. Reality then intrudes, and he's already in decline at 31, that accelerates through his early 30s, and he's out of the league by 35. So he's been worth a tiny fraction of that $80M.

Most big ticket deals are like that to some degree. Vaughn might be a worse-than-average example. But I'd guesstimate 80% of players with 3+ year contracts end up being worth far less than their contracts. This is why I'm very conservative when arguing for free agent signings - you're going in with the assumption that it won't work out on straight value for the dollar. You almost have to make a playoff run or two to not get destroyed on the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...