Jump to content

Chris Tillman = Batting Practice


JDBirds10

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 257
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Trea - I brought up Smoak earlier - but can you tell me this... would you have given up on Smoak if he was on the Orioles?

If we were in a win now mode like this year, yes I would not have him start the season with the Orioles and would have sought a player that can fill that void. Anything he'd give me in the minors would have been a bonus and if he was tearing the cover off the ball, I'd have a decision to make but it would be a good thing.

Tillman is clearly hurting this team. They came back to win one of his starts after he'd put the Orioles in a hole. They couldn't muster enough tonight to come back again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were in a win now mode like this year, yes I would not have him start the season with the Orioles and would have sought a player that can fill that void. Anything he'd give me in the minors would have been a bonus and if he was tearing the cover off the ball, I'd have a decision to make but it would be a good thing.

Tillman is clearly hurting this team. They came back to win one of his starts after he'd put the Orioles in a hole. They couldn't muster enough tonight to come back again.

But, unless I am incorrect - you want nothing more to do with Tillman. Does Smoak belong in the same class - a failed prospect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh???

Britt Ghiroli picked up on this as well:

Manager Buck Showalter remarked that Tillman has had one good start “statistically”, a so-so one last time out and obviously he struggled tonight. The statical comment is due to his six no-hit innings against Tampa Bay, an offense that has struggled to put any runs on the board against anyone. Clearly, Showalter wasn’t overly impressed with that first start from Tillman, although it was light-years better than what we saw on Wednesday night.

http://brittghiroli.mlblogs.com/2011/04/14/more-on-tillman/

Buck is not a Tillman fan IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, unless I am incorrect - you want nothing more to do with Tillman. Does Smoak belong in the same class - a failed prospect?

So far this season I would say no.

But Smoak has obviously adjusted - Tillman has yet to do so and the way he refused to do what the coaches wanted him to do last year speaks volumes IMO. He just wants to stay in the majors obviously, but he doesn't necessarily want to do what he needs to do to have success there IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[video=youtube;fLrpBLDWyCI]

Jason Berken was worth 1.1 rWAR and 0.8 fWAR in 2010 in 62 IP.

Chris Tillman was worth 0.0 rWAR and -0.2 fWAR in 53 IP last season.

0.8 fWAR is pretty good for a middle reliever. I don't need to tell you Tillman's worth is terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far this season I would say no.

But Smoak has obviously adjusted - Tillman has yet to do so and the way he refused to do what the coaches wanted him to do last year speaks volumes IMO. He just wants to stay in the majors obviously, but he doesn't necessarily want to do what he needs to do to have success there IMO.

So... Smoak's small sample of limited success (if that is wha you want to call it) this year has far greater weight of Tillman's small sample of limited failure. Can we not say - hey Tillman pitched no hit ball against the helpless Rays but Smoak had a 2 hit night a couple of nights ago that raised his OPS from .679 to .793? What's the difference other than you are on record giggling like a little girl in love with Smoak and you don't really care for Tillman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right. This post is why you fail.

For pointing out facts?

Tillman is not worth as much as you think he is. There's a reason the Diamondbacks wanted David Hernandez (who was a bullpen pitcher BTW) instead of Tillman.

I bet if you gave any team choice between Berken or Tillman - they would take Berken.

The Orioles could cut Tillman tomorrow and pick up a starter like a Freddy Garcia for instance and get the same exact performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So... Smoak's small sample of limited success (if that is wha you want to call it) this year has far greater weight of Tillman's small sample of limited failure. Can we not say - hey Tillman pitched no hit ball against the helpless Rays but Smoak had a 2 hit night a couple of nights ago that raised his OPS from .679 to .793? What's the difference other than you are on record giggling like a little girl in love with Smoak and you don't really care for Tillman?

Smoak just hit a HR tonight BTW and he has always shown patience and a selective eye and that plays at the ML level. Tillman's stuff does not play at the ML level period. That's the difference. Smoak has ML skills, Tillman doesn't.

Tampa had a pretty depleted lineup BTW and was a terrible team at the plate. And he got lucky on a lot of balls that were hit and was helped out by a great defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jason Berken was worth 1.1 rWAR and 0.8 fWAR in 2010 in 62 IP.

Chris Tillman was worth 0.0 rWAR and -0.2 fWAR in 53 IP last season.

0.8 fWAR is pretty good for a middle reliever.

You're awesome at using stats devoid of any context. Berken is 27 and has become an above above average bullpen arm after failing as a starter . Tillman is once highly touted 23 year old prospect that has 25 career ML starts. I don't really know what else to say. Even if you think Tillman could be, at best, a 200 IP, 4.5-4.7 ERA guy you still keep him over Berken. The Berken's of the world can easily be replaced. No doubt they have value, but you don't punt on a 23 year old that has a shot of being a cheap, long term solution for a solid 27 year old bullpen arm. You make me come off as a giant Tillman fan even when I'm not. It's just basic logic.

I bet a couple years ago you thought the Red Sox should have traded Buchholtz after he wasn't magically awesome on day one, struggled, and bounced between AAA and the majors for a couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles could cut Tillman tomorrow and pick up a starter like a Freddy Garcia for instance and get the same exact performance.

...

I don't even know where to begin. Are you somehow arguing that Tillman and Freddy Garcia are equal in value? Wow. You do realize that one is 23 and one is 37, correct? You do understand that maybe, perhaps, one day in the future Tillman could be a valuable cost controlled player? Even if you personally think the chances of this occurring are slim, you do realize it is a possibility? What the hell does Freddy Garcia bring to the table?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're awesome at using stats devoid of any context. Berken is 27 and has become an above above average bullpen arm after failing as a starter . Tillman is once highly touted 23 year old prospect that has 25 career ML starts. I don't really know what else to say. Even if you think Tillman could be, at best, a 200 IP, 4.5-4.7 ERA guy you still keep him over Berken. The Berken's of the world can easily be replaced. No doubt they have value, but you don't punt on a 23 year old that has a shot of being a cheap, long term solution for a solid 27 year old bullpen arm. You make me come off as a giant Tillman fan even when I'm not. It's just basic logic.

I bet a couple years ago you thought the Red Sox should have traded Buchholtz after he wasn't magically awesome on day one, struggled, and bounced between AAA and the majors for a couple of years.

If Trea was an Indian fan he would have been first in line to give Guts a swift kick to the curb. Lucky us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agree with most everything thats been said, but he needs to get going because when Mateo comes back its either Norby or Stowers back to Norfolk. By the look on his face last night he even thought it was bad luck or execution on that bunt attempt.
    • Thanks for your clarification. Yes if Orioles lose Bradish for the  year , that would be a massive blow to team .  He would be difficult to replace . Nonetheless, Elias & staff  need  plan for trade for pitching reinforcements up to the deadline 
    • That would finish his contract at what 33 years old. Interesting.
    • Another big night, going 3 for 4 with a HR and a double. That brings the wRC+ up to a cool 165 since the beginning of May.
    • Today in his first plate appearance he walked. The line drive he hit in his second plate appearance had an XBA of .660 and the line drive he hit in his third plate appearance had an XBA of .790. I don’t know whether he’ll get out of the current slump, but that’s terrible luck. I still think Mullins can be a valuable player. He’s had an XBA over .500 on a few other balls in games he has played recently that have been caught. They are already limiting his playing time. While Cowser can play CF, the idea that Hays can play CF has no real basis. His already poor jumps have gotten worse this year. His sprint speed is down to 26.9 ft/s. I’m fact, Santander currently covers more feet in the outfield because of his superior jumps. I get that he hit 2 home runs yesterday, so some people are back in on Hays, but playing him in CF is a terrible idea.
    • Oh, no.Perhaps I wasn't clear. Suarez has been solid and an "adequate " starter. I was just saying he cant be the dominant , elite pitcher Bradish is, as good as Suarez has been. I think if we lose Bradish it's going to be a struggle to win against the best teams..But Suarez belongs in the rotation for as long as he pitches well, and he HAS pitched well.
    • Roy , are you saying that if Suarez continues to be “adequate “ , they should take him out of the rotation ? what does Suarez has to do with Bradish ?   Please elaborate 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...