Birds of B'more Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/mlb-playoffs-seeding-races-news-and-notes-090511 Simply lends more credence to what most of us already suspect. If, as expected, Andy MacPhail departs as president of baseball operations, owner Peter Angelos will prefer someone with whom he is familiar, or at the very least, someone who comes highly recommended by a person he trusts.That is Angelos’ pattern — he knew MacPhail from their work together in the 2002 and ’06 labor negotiations. And, according to one source, Angelos is not especially well-versed with the current crop of GM candidates. When asked about former Diamondbacks GM Josh Byrnes and Rangers assistant GM Thad Levine, Angelos essentially replied, “Who?” the source said. Manager Buck Showalter, who seems to have replaced MacPhail as Angelos’ most trusted confidante, could have a say in choosing the next GM. But it’s also possible that MacPhail will have significant input, considering his relationship with Angelos over the years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byrdz Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Manager Buck Showalter' date=' who seems to have replaced MacPhail as Angelos’ most trusted confidante, could have a say in choosing the next GM.[/quote']As much as it pains me to say it, looks like JTrea was right about the Buck/PA relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaosLex Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 We're doomed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltimoreTerp Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 I don't want Showalter to get any input on the next general manager. In fact, I want the next general manager to have COMPLETE input on whether Showalter is the next manager of the Orioles. That's the way it works, and should work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Jim Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 The relationship between a manager and a GM should be essentially bicameral, and fit our traditional notions of how bicameralism works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrea81 Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 I don't want Showalter to get any input on the next general manager. In fact, I want the next general manager to have COMPLETE input on whether Showalter is the next manager of the Orioles. That's the way it works, and should work. It didn't work too badly when DJ picked Gillick... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltimoreTerp Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 It didn't work too badly when DJ picked Gillick... Other than you rejecting reality and substituting your own, sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gordo Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 I think the idea of AM making a recommendation is interesting, and a new thought I haven't heard speculated upon before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sangar Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 The relationship between a manager and a GM should be essentially bicameral, and fit our traditional notions of how bicameralism works.Not to necessarily disagree, but isn't it the GM's job to translate ownership's instructions to the on-field product? I fully agree they should collaborate, but the final decision is the GM's alone and should remain so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltimoreTerp Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 I think the idea of AM making a recommendation is interesting, and a new thought I haven't heard speculated upon before. If he really is leaving of his own accord, it makes sense to give him some input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonySoprano Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Other than you rejecting reality and substituting your own, sure. If you can, without making ill thought-out smart-ass responses, what was wrong with having Pat Gillick in Baltimore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddieMurrayfan Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/mlb-playoffs-seeding-races-news-and-notes-090511Simply lends more credence to what most of us already suspect. "Who?" A small word that makes a big statement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sangar Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 As much as it pains me to say it, looks like JTrea was right about the Buck/PA relationship.More often than not he is right. His propensity to nag like an old woman is what makes people want to disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Jim Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 Not to necessarily disagree, but isn't it the GM's job to translate ownership's instructions to the on-field product? I fully agree they should collaborate, but the final decision is the GM's alone and should remain so. An excellent point - I meant mostly temparmentally/conceptually. I.e., the GM needs to be the "wiser," "cooler head" - thinking of long-term events...while a manager needs to be something closer to the fans, pushing for victories on a daily basis. The GM should clearly have the ability to reject what the manager wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byrdz Posted September 5, 2011 Share Posted September 5, 2011 "Who?" A small word that makes a big statement I think that wasn't PA's direct quote, based on Rosenthal's wording, still it's probably pretty close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.