Jump to content

Title of "Best Hitter on Earth"


Sanfran327

Recommended Posts

I saw an NFL Network program that did this with running backs, and it inspired me to try it with hitters. Basically, it's a list of who you think held the crown of "best hitter in the game" going backwards. Once you see the first few, you'll get the gist.

Here goes nothin':

Miguel Cabrera

Albert Pujols

Manny Ramirez

Barry Bonds

Alex Rodriguez

Sammy Sosa

Larry Walker

Juan Gonzalez

(seems to be a trend there - LOL)

Tack on a few previous to Juan Gon. My memory gets a little hazy before then off the top of my head. Also, I'm sure most of you will disagree with some of my selections - go right ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason Todd Helton came to mind, and so I checked to see if his 2000 season he led the league in OPS, and he did (yes, Coors field-aided, of course).

And then I looked at the leader board for OPS in 2000. Absolutely nuts; 19 hitters OPS'd more than 1 and you have to go all the way down to 49 to find a hitter under .900 (one David Segui :D). For being only a few years back, one almost forgets how out of control things were in the steroid era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Pujols and Bonds, I don't think there was ever a time when ARod was the best.
I don't know if there was a time that Manny was the best.

Also needs more Frank Thomas.

Manny was other-worldly for a brief time. ARod, though a total douche, was also very good, even if only in throw-away situations.

Frank Thomas... definitely deserving. Perhaps slip him in between Juan Gon and Walker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manny was other-worldly for a brief time. ARod, though a total douche, was also very good, even if only in throw-away situations.

Frank Thomas... definitely deserving. Perhaps slip him in between Juan Gon and Walker?

Manny was great, not saying he wasn't. But was there a period in time when you had the choice between Bonds, Pujols and Manny that you would have picked Manny?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manny was other-worldly for a brief time. ARod, though a total douche, was also very good, even if only in throw-away situations.

Frank Thomas... definitely deserving. Perhaps slip him in between Juan Gon and Walker?

Manny's best seasons came when Bonds was putting up a .550 OBP, so no way he can outdo Bonds.

ARod might could get '05, which is the time between Bonds' reign and Pujols' reign.

From '90-'04, Bonds led the league in OPS+ 9 times. Maybe you could give someone else the crown in the mid 90's (when he didn't lead the league), but he definitely retook it by 2000. From 2006-2010, it was Pujols.

Actually, after looking at it again, you might could give the late 90's to ARod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manny was great, not saying he wasn't. But was there a period in time when you had the choice between Bonds, Pujols and Manny that you would have picked Manny?
Manny's best seasons came when Bonds was putting up a .550 OBP, so no way he can outdo Bonds.

ARod might could get '05, which is the time between Bonds' reign and Pujols' reign.

From '90-'04, Bonds led the league in OPS+ 9 times. Maybe you could give someone else the crown in the mid 90's (when he didn't lead the league), but he definitely retook it by 2000. From 2006-2010, it was Pujols.

Actually, after looking at it again, you might could give the late 90's to ARod.

That's when I was thinking about Manny. I gave the nod to ARod right before Bonds' era though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you'd be far off if you went with career OPS+. Ruth leads that list, followed by Williams, Bonds, Gehrig, Hornsby, Mantle, Shoeless Joe Jackson, Ty Cobb, and Albert Pujols. Votto comes in at 17th and Cabrera is way down at 29th.

Now if you want to only consider single seasons OPS+, Bonds and Ruth own that list. Of the 13 best seasons, Bonds has 4 (including the top 3) and Ruth has 5. Pujols' 2008 season is tied for 85th and Cabrera's best seasong is tied for 191st.

You could play around with "top 5" or "top 10" or "best 3 year peak" if you wanted, but that would be too much work for me.

Career Offensive WAR would factor in stolen bases, bringing A-Rod and Jeter to the top among active players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you'd be far off if you went with career OPS+. Ruth leads that list, followed by Williams, Bonds, Gehrig, Hornsby, Mantle, Shoeless Joe Jackson, Ty Cobb, and Albert Pujols. Votto comes in at 17th and Cabrera is way down at 29th.

I think he's talking about in any current moment.

The problem with looking at career OPS or OPS+ (and I know this is a thread jack in a way) is the quality of competition guys have faced. What would Ruth do against an influx of talent from the Negro Leagues and the Caribbean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's talking about in any current moment.

The problem with looking at career OPS or OPS+ (and I know this is a thread jack in a way) is the quality of competition guys have faced. What would Ruth do against an influx of talent from the Negro Leagues and the Caribbean?

Yeah, not all-time best top 10 or something like that.

Getting all the way back to Ruth would be fun, and probably not all that time consuming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm interested in the era right around 1990. Griffey was damn good, but not as great as he was going to be. Thomas hadn't hit the scene yet. Canseco was hurt in 89 and for some of 90. IIRC, Strawberry was well hooked on booger sugar by then.

Wade Boggs? Singles hitter. I think that's the year George Brett won the batting title but he didn't hit for a lot of power.

So who was the man back then? I know there's probably someone obvious but I can't think of who. Tony Gwynn?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm interested in the era right around 1990. Griffey was damn good, but not as great as he was going to be. Thomas hadn't hit the scene yet. Canseco was hurt in 89 and for some of 90. IIRC, Strawberry was well hooked on booger sugar by then.

Wade Boggs? Singles hitter. I think that's the year George Brett won the batting title but he didn't hit for a lot of power.

So who was the man back then? I know there's probably someone obvious but I can't think of who. Tony Gwynn?

Bonds........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...