Jump to content

Markakis ended up at negative WAR in both rWAR and fWAR this year


AlbionHero

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/mlb/player/stats/_/id/6478/nick-markakis

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=5930&position=OF

I know he's a fan favorite and all, but at this point I'm really wondering what we should do about the guy. He's not really helping us either offensively or defensively, and we'd likely be better off playing someone else there every day... but with that contract and Angelos' love affair with him, we're likely stuck with a below average RF for the next couple years at least. What do you guys think? Should we try to find a replacement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
http://espn.go.com/mlb/player/stats/_/id/6478/nick-markakis

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=5930&position=OF

I know he's a fan favorite and all, but at this point I'm really wondering what we should do about the guy. He's not really helping us either offensively or defensively, and we'd likely be better off playing someone else there every day... but with that contract and Angelos' love affair with him, we're likely stuck with a below average RF for the next couple years at least. What do you guys think? Should we try to find a replacement?

He will be the right fielder next season because of his contract. After that I suspect he is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://espn.go.com/mlb/player/stats/_/id/6478/nick-markakis

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=5930&position=OF

I know he's a fan favorite and all, but at this point I'm really wondering what we should do about the guy. He's not really helping us either offensively or defensively, and we'd likely be better off playing someone else there every day... but with that contract and Angelos' love affair with him, we're likely stuck with a below average RF for the next couple years at least. What do you guys think? Should we try to find a replacement?

Not sure what you mean by "but with that contract and Angelos's love affair with him" statement, but Nick's contract is through the 2014 season with a option year/buy out for 2015. The Orioles would only need to pay Markakis for one more year and then buy him out. I guess my question to you would be, what type of loyalty should a lifetime Orioles garnish? Ripken was a fan favorite and wasn't worth his contract over the final few years of a deal IMO. I for one think that Markakis was still being hampered by an injury (likely the wrist) and that he will be better next year. The Orioles can't pay him $18M or so in 2015 so we might see him bought out and return at a cheaper salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, Nick has been my favorite player since he arrived here in 2006, and it pains me to see him have such a bad season.

Second, if he performs at this level in 2014, then he can't play 160 games. He got to play that many this season on the strength of his fine career, and with Buck hoping he'd get things turned around, but he never did. So, now Buck is warned. Nick is under contract, and I expect him to be the Opening Day RF and to play every day (or close to it) for the first two months of the season. If he's having another poor year at that point, then Buck should start using other guys to play RF at least a good portion of the time to see if they can outperform Nick. And we should have someone on the roster who has a shot at being better than replacement level.

I think it's likely that Nick bounces back at least part of the way next year, maybe all the way, but clearly we need to be prepared to go to Plan B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, Nick has been my favorite player since he arrived here in 2006, and it pains me to see him have such a bad season.

Second, if he performs at this level in 2014, then he can't play 160 games. He got to play that many this season on the strength of his fine career, and with Buck hoping he'd get things turned around, but he never did. So, now Buck is warned. Nick is under contract, and I expect him to be the Opening Day RF and to play every day (or close to it) for the first two months of the season. If he's having another poor year at that point, then Buck should start using other guys to play RF at least a good portion of the time to see if they can outperform Nick. And we should have someone on the roster who has a shot at being better than replacement level.

I think it's likely that Nick bounces back at least part of the way next year, maybe all the way, but clearly we need to be prepared to go to Plan B.

Yes, this is what I think has to happen, too. I don't know what was wrong with him this year. But something obviously was. I hope he can bounce back, but without knowing the root cause I can't say for sure that he will.

If he's hitting .280 with no power and few walks after six or eight weeks of 2014 he needs to have his playing time scaled back.

At this point you almost have to count on a bounceback because he's untradeable without eating a lot of contract or swapping him out for another bad contract. I just don't see Duquette or Angelos signing off on trading Nick for another team's problem just to be rid of him. Personally I wouldn't do that because I like the guy and want to see him succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is what I think has to happen, too. I don't know what was wrong with him this year. But something obviously was. I hope he can bounce back, but without knowing the root cause I can't say for sure that he will.

If he's hitting .280 with no power and few walks after six or eight weeks of 2014 he needs to have his playing time scaled back.

At this point you almost have to count on a bounceback because he's untradeable without eating a lot of contract or swapping him out for another bad contract. I just don't see Duquette or Angelos signing off on trading Nick for another team's problem just to be rid of him. Personally I wouldn't do that because I like the guy and want to see him succeed.

Yeah. Me too. He's our mess next year. Another good look at why even moderate long term deals can be hazardous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Negative WAR in RF is not going to cut it. We have already lost one chance to make the playoffs this season with Nick's poor production one of the two or three main factors and I think it would be foolish to allow him to hurt the team in a similar manner next season.

I don't know what Nick's issue has been this year, but if Nick kept trying to play through injury or if he was not in shape, then he did a major disservice to the team by playing. If our FO and Nick believe that this is something that is correctable, I would remain skeptical.

These Orioles fan favorites who receive multi-year contacts have been an overhang to our competitiveness in recent years including Mora, Gibbons, BRob and Markakis though I acknowledge other teams are not immune from these issues. Oh well. We all have our favorites, but it is interesting to see continued posts about what Adam Jones could become if only he would improve his game while we have a RFer earning $15M and putting up a negative WAR with few complaints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is what I think has to happen, too. I don't know what was wrong with him this year. But something obviously was. I hope he can bounce back, but without knowing the root cause I can't say for sure that he will.

If he's hitting .280 with no power and few walks after six or eight weeks of 2014 he needs to have his playing time scaled back.

At this point you almost have to count on a bounceback because he's untradeable without eating a lot of contract or swapping him out for another bad contract. I just don't see Duquette or Angelos signing off on trading Nick for another team's problem just to be rid of him. Personally I wouldn't do that because I like the guy and want to see him succeed.

This is the biggest point. I told my wife that we have one more year before we out of those terrible contracts (Roberts this year and Markakis next year). I hope Markakis can rebound but if not, I hope Buck will understand this and not treat him like a star, but a mediocre player who needs to sit at times. I would not rule out a comeback, but Markakis has the kind of game that tends to erode more quickly and unfortunately, he may be on the down side of his peak and crashing.

At $15 million, he's not going anywhere this offseason so as Orioles fans, our only hope is that at least he can get that average and OBP up to decent levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://espn.go.com/mlb/player/stats/_/id/6478/nick-markakis

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=5930&position=OF

I know he's a fan favorite and all, but at this point I'm really wondering what we should do about the guy. He's not really helping us either offensively or defensively, and we'd likely be better off playing someone else there every day... but with that contract and Angelos' love affair with him, we're likely stuck with a below average RF for the next couple years at least. What do you guys think? Should we try to find a replacement?

Why not just wait until 2014 season before any decisions are made? He may be

better next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would feel better if Nick was going to Brady not a trainer with Brady's workout going to Nick.

Me too, but it's not going to happen. Nick's married with 3 kids, spends a good bit of 7 months of the year away from home, and isn't going to spend the winter in Irvine. Let's just hope he works hard and that the program they've given him is a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me too, but it's not going to happen. Nick's married with 3 kids, spends a good bit of 7 months of the year away from home, and isn't going to spend the winter in Irvine. Let's just hope he works hard and that the program they've given him is a good one.

I agree. I think after 66 million dollars he's chosen his family over his career production. There is no Adam Jones in Nick's game. You shouldn't lose your physicality before you turn 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...