Jump to content

Jake Arrieta


micahl69

Recommended Posts

Jake Arietta is trying to prove that he is the real deal.

Jake is 3-1 on the year for the Cubbies with a miniscule 1.98 ERA after today's gem.

His last three starts:

6IP, 0 ER, 7 strikeouts

7IP, 0 ER, 9 strikeouts

7IP, 1 ER, 11 strikeouts (today).

That feldman trade does not look very pretty right now considering we had Feldman for three months and Clevenger is the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It doesn't matter to me if he throws 5 no hitters in back to back games. I have written him off as an Oriole. I don't think he was ever going to put it together here.

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

This. I just don't think he would have this kind of success here in Baltimore.

Yet I'd love to see this board if Arrietta and Hammell both shut us down in August with Strop pitching well in the pen. I doubt people will be as even-keeled about this.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, I don't really buy the "change of scenery" excuse. Jake was obviously a very talented guy and I just don't think you trade that for 3 months of a replacement level SP. You sort him out; if it's personal problems that are affecting him you sort those out, if it's the media issues you come out and back him big time with the media. We had him under team control so it's not like we were forced to trade him. He would've surely been a valuable bullpen arm too if we had kept hold of him.

Let's see if he can keep it up but I was always a Jake believer. People are rather impatient with young starters here, yet from the Cavalry--which the consensus defines as a massive disaster--we've gotten a decent SP in Tillman and a nice closer in Britton, and could've had more with Jake...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, I don't really buy the "change of scenery" excuse. Jake was obviously a very talented guy and I just don't think you trade that for 3 months of a replacement level SP. You sort him out; if it's personal problems that are affecting him you sort those out, if it's the media issues you come out and back him big time with the media. We had him under team control so it's not like we were forced to trade him. He would've surely been a valuable bullpen arm too if we had kept hold of him.

Let's see if he can keep it up but I was always a Jake believer. People are rather impatient with young starters here, yet from the Cavalry--which the consensus defines as a massive disaster--we've gotten a decent SP in Tillman and a nice closer in Britton, and could've had more with Jake...

We needed Feldman. We were trying to get back to the playoffs. We didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We needed Feldman. We were trying to get back to the playoffs. We didn't.

Which is ok if you aren't talking about a guy with whom I considered to a have as high a ceiling as Tillman, maybe higher. And he was coming off a year when he had an injury.

Now lets compare that to Britton who had a whole year to fail after the injury and is now prospering in a role he's desperately needed.

I would have liked to see Jake develop under Wallace and have a year removed from his procedure like he is right now. No doubt the NL is helping but his stuff is nasty, I've been impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We needed Feldman. We were trying to get back to the playoffs. We didn't.

We needed Feldman, yes, perhaps, but we didn't need to trade Jake. A year earlier we weren't willing to give him up in a Chase Headley deal. It was a bit reactive to then give up on him a year later, given he was coming off an injury as socal notes. I suspect--and I hope I'm wrong--that the powers that be fell prey to the a similar kind of frustration and over-reaction due to the way in which Jake tended to fail--spectacularly--as did most fans on the OH. In short, it feels like they just gave up on him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We needed Feldman, yes, perhaps, but we didn't need to trade Jake. A year earlier we weren't willing to give him up in a Chase Headley deal. It was a bit reactive to then give up on him a year later, given he was coming off an injury as socal notes. I suspect--and I hope I'm wrong--that the powers that be fell prey to the a similar kind of frustration and over-reaction due to the way in which Jake tended to fail--spectacularly--as did most fans on the OH. In short, it feels like they just gave up on him...

I think the Padres wanted Davis and Arrieta, so it's presumptive to say we wouldn't have given him up for Headley. We surely would have imo if he were the centerpiece.

I think it's fair to say we could have stashed him in the BP and worked with him more. The Cubs have him working from the stretch exclusively. The trade was fair. You don't satisfy a need for nothing. We've been the Cubs and I'd rather be us. It's the cost of doing business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Padres wanted Davis and Arrieta, so it's presumptive to say we wouldn't have given him up for Headley. We surely would have imo if he were the centerpiece.

I think it's fair to say we could have stashed him in the BP and worked with him more. The Cubs have him working from the stretch exclusively. The trade was fair. You don't satisfy a need for nothing. We've been the Cubs and I'd rather be us. It's the cost of doing business.

I've seen you say this before in regards to him pitching from the stretch, but it's really the same modified delivery Tillman uses.

I agree they had a need but Jake is a thoroughbred. Just once I wanted them to say,"You don't need all of these pitches." He needed to be reigned in a bit. He is throwing a cutter to LHB now that is filthy.

I thought you might like the horse analogy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is ok if you aren't talking about a guy with whom I considered to a have as high a ceiling as Tillman, maybe higher. And he was coming off a year when he had an injury.

Now lets compare that to Britton who had a whole year to fail after the injury and is now prospering in a role he's desperately needed.

I would have liked to see Jake develop under Wallace and have a year removed from his procedure like he is right now. No doubt the NL is helping but his stuff is nasty, I've been impressed.

I must admit, I thought the bone spurs shaving was a precursor for Tommy John surgery as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen you say this before in regards to him pitching from the stretch, but it's really the same modified delivery Tillman uses.

I agree they had a need but Jake is a thoroughbred. Just once I wanted them to say,"You don't need all of these pitches." He needed to be reigned in a bit. He is throwing a cutter to LHB now that is filthy.

I thought you might like the horse analogy.

He threw six pitches, three which were mostly lousy. Maybe after the Cubs had him in the minor leagues, he did not have any choice after having been uprooted. I don't know. He is looking pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He threw six pitches, three which were mostly lousy. Maybe after the Cubs had him in the minor leagues, he did not have any choice after having been uprooted. I don't know. He is looking pretty good.

And now he's at four, but mainly three. The cutter is reserved for LHB and the CU to RHB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Four more shutout innings for Chace last night, 2 hits, 3 walks, 6 strikeouts.   His ERA is 0.91, WHiP 1.21, K/9 12.7.   The only blemish is his 5.2 BB/9.   He’s pitched 8 games and has only allowed runs in two of them.   Yesterday he threw 45 of 68 pitches for strikes.  For some reason the O’s kind of have him under wraps, as he’s only been allowed to exceed 70 pitches twice, back in April.  He’s also been kept to four inning outings.  They’re clearly being very careful with the 20-year old (turns 21 in three weeks).  In fairness, they did need to shut him down for a month late last summer, so I’m guessing it’s more season load management than game-by-game decisions.   In any event, it’s been a promising campaign for Chace.    
    • I mean, I don't want to denigrate your experience, but I think you're underestimating the power potential of elite athletes.  The leg strength required to send a grown man 20 mph from a dead stop is the same leg strength required to do a deadlift, or do a squat.  Can your buddy run a 4.5 40?
    • The Orioles were 30-16 in one-run games in 2023. They are 6-6 this year so far. Orioles magic hasn’t been there this year, at least so far. What changed?
    • I can’t even believe the grasping of straws going on here.  Why don’t we just bring up every guy at Norfolk who has an .800+ OPS, since they’re obviously better than their major league counterparts?  Oh wait, everyone at Norfolk has an .800+ OPS! As to Mullins, yes he’s looked awful at the plate for a month, but the O’s are nowhere near the point of regularly benching him or pinch hitting for him in key situations vs. RHP.   You know why?   Because even good players have slumps, and the best way to get them out of it is to keep playing them until they emerge from them.  And Mullins has a long enough track record where the odds of him coming out of this eventually are decent.  Not 100%, but a lot more likely than not.  I mean, the guy had an .859 OPS the first 3 weeks of the season.  That guy didn’t have some instantaneous physical decline that has turned him into the second coming of Chris Davis permanently.  I know it’s frustrating to watch him right now.  I’m as frustrated as anyone.   But every major league team would be doing what the Orioles have been doing, for another 4-6 weeks at a minimum.  
    • But it doesn't really matter if correlation implies causation, because we can at least infer that people with fast 40 times have a good chance of being able to squat 2.5x their body weight, regardless of whether there is a causative relationship.  And we have verifiable data thay many football players at skill positions are able to squat large amounts of weight that would be out of reach of many other people even given the same amount of training and diet.  So with both if these things in hand we can safely assume that these lifting numbers are achievable for most elite athletes, which Holliday qualifies as.  So I don't think we should be shocked or skeptical that he's able to pull these numbers.    I'd also be shocked if there wasn't a causative relationship between 40 times and lifting heavy.  Lifting large amounts of weight requires powerful muscles in the legs.  Running really fast also requires powerful muscles in the legs.  You can get in the weeds about muscle fiber type but to me if you're good at one, there's a great chance thay you're at least moderately good at the other.
    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...