Jump to content

Change to HoF Voting


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Hall of Fame announces changes in voting for recently retired players, reducing length of stay on ballot from maximum of 15 to 10 years.</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="

">July 26, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Three candidates currently on ballot in years 10-15 will be grandfathered in and be considered full 15 years: Mattingly, Trammell, Lee Smith</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="

">July 26, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Now is this an attempt to unclutter the ballot?

Or is it an attempt to make it more difficult for those with a PED tainted past to get in?

One thing is for sure, there are going to a number of folks (Edgar Martinez) that have strong cases that won't get in.

I would also say this hurts Mussina's chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition, the Hall will now require an Internet registration of the approximately 625 eligible members of the Baseball Writers' Association of America and those voters will be notified about a specific code of conduct regarding the handling of that ballot. Voters will be asked to formally agree to a stipulation that their ballot is non-transferable with a penalty of permanently losing that vote.

So no more selling your vote to Deadspin but it is fine to turn in a blank ballot or only name Jim Morris.

Typical. I expected to see a change of that nature to the voting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrible decision, doesn't make any sense. Raines' and Trammell's chances just dropped to zero. Blyleven never would've stood a chance. What problem is this supposed to solve?

It is going to be interesting to watch the SABR-community's Tim Raines lobbying in view of this news (I count myself part of this). After the eventual success of Blyleven, I felt confident Raines would eventually get the enshrinement he so well deserves, but this muddies the water considerably. I would expect the intensity of the tone of Raines proponent appeals to spike now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is going to be interesting to watch the SABR-community's Tim Raines lobbying in view of this news (I count myself part of this). After the eventual success of Blyleven, I felt confident Raines would eventually get the enshrinement he so well deserves, but this muddies the water considerably. I would expect the intensity of the tone of Raines proponent appeals to spike now.

Maybe some year in the future, the Veterans committee will be lead by advanced statistically minded folks. Not. TWTW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnit, I was hoping you were a big hall guy weams.

I don't think this will have all that much of an effect, really, except for a few names already on the ballot. The BBWAA body is gradually getting better and moreso the Veteran's Committee will get fresher names to consider for their modern-era vote. Sooner or later the guys that we think have a decent HOF case will get in. I just hope they're alive to accept their plaque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnit, I was hoping you were a big hall guy weams.

I don't think this will have all that much of an effect, really, except for a few names already on the ballot. The BBWAA body is gradually getting better and moreso the Veteran's Committee will get fresher names to consider for their modern-era vote. Sooner or later the guys that we think have a decent HOF case will get in. I just hope they're alive to accept their plaque.

It kills Martinez and Raines and hurts Mussina.

Has the revamped vet committee put in any modern players yet? I don't think they have.

Edit- I see they did add Santo in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...