Jump to content

Blocking the plate.


bpilktree

Recommended Posts

The more I watched that play today the madder I am getting. He was so clearly blocking the plate based on the rule and there have been many many calls where it was less obvious then that called blocking the plate. I can not figure what the world they were looking at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 217
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Buck: "If that's not blocking the plate I don't know what is. I'm totally confused now." <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a></p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">August 22, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, I think the rule is an abomination. All because of Buster Posey. A rare injury occurs, and they create a rule that was poorly crafted and ambiguous. Having ambiguous rules like that lead to controversy.

And honestly the catcher was blocking the plate prior to receiving the ball. It gave Chris Davis an awkward path to the plate. And then he took more of the plate away once receiving the ball.

That was the turning point in the game. Down 2-0. It's the difference between 2-1 and an inning still going...and 2-0, the O's still pitching Gausman unnecessarily, and the game going south in a hurry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most amazing thing was it was the shortest review i can remember too. A huge play and one at the very least was not obvious and they make it that fast yet on easy calls they take forever.

I know people say it was dumb sending him but it was with two outs a lefty throwing heading towards center is a very tough throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, I think the rule is an abomination. All because of Buster Posey. A rare injury occurs, and they create a rule that was poorly crafted and ambiguous. Having ambiguous rules like that lead to controversy.

And honestly the catcher was blocking the plate prior to receiving the ball. It gave Chris Davis an awkward path to the plate. And then he took more of the plate away once receiving the ball.

That was the turning point in the game. Down 2-0. It's the difference between 2-1 and an inning still going...and 2-0, the O's still pitching Gausman unnecessarily, and the game going south in a hurry.

Very well said.

I remember when Ventura went off the rails (and rightly so) when the call went against him and then that very same day a totally similar play in a Nats game went the other way. The plays were almost identical but the replay booth had two different rulings. Hopefully MLB will just get rid of this stupid rule entirely.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad they didn't reverse the play. This isn't the NFL... baseball doesn't need its games being decided by some lame interpretive rule system akin to the tuck rule.

Common sense says he was out. The throw beat him; the tag beat him; and the catcher did his best to stay out of the baseline but had to reach into it to catch the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad they didn't reverse the play. This isn't the NFL... baseball doesn't need its games being decided by some lame interpretive rule system akin to the tuck rule.

Common sense says he was out. The throw beat him; the tag beat him; and the catcher did his best to stay out of the baseline but had to reach into it to catch the ball.

The problem is, as it is in the NFL, it's not called consistently one way or the other.

More evidence that replay is a joke and a waste of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, I think the rule is an abomination. All because of Buster Posey. A rare injury occurs, and they create a rule that was poorly crafted and ambiguous. Having ambiguous rules like that lead to controversy.

And honestly the catcher was blocking the plate prior to receiving the ball. It gave Chris Davis an awkward path to the plate. And then he took more of the plate away once receiving the ball.

That was the turning point in the game. Down 2-0. It's the difference between 2-1 and an inning still going...and 2-0, the O's still pitching Gausman unnecessarily, and the game going south in a hurry.

Perfect post. I agree 100%. The rule sucks, but if you are going to have the rule, enforce it consistently. He was blocking the plate. He was not at first when he was standing in front of the plate, but he shifted his body before he caught the ball to get into the baseline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad they didn't reverse the play. This isn't the NFL... baseball doesn't need its games being decided by some lame interpretive rule system akin to the tuck rule.

Common sense says he was out. The throw beat him; the tag beat him; and the catcher did his best to stay out of the baseline but had to reach into it to catch the ball.

He was in the baseline prior to receiving the ball. If the rule isn't going to be applied properly, then Chris Davis should have completely railroaded him and exploded the ball out of his glove if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After watching the replay a half dozen times, its pretty obvious that the catcher had the plate blocked before the ball arrived. Even the Cubs announcers believed that was the case. I have no clue what the people in NY were looking at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah he had it snow coned if there is no rule he is safe because Davis runs him over. The rule there he should be called safe as well. Either way rule or no rule we get a run. well unless the umps make just forget the rule and call their own thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's game really annoyed me. Gausman was bad. Some guys had really awful ABs. The Cubs stole a few hits away with good D. The Cubs got a couple cheap hits that the O's didn't. The screwed up blocking rule. Getting beat by Arrieta and Strop.

Overall, a pretty frustrating game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...