Jump to content

vs. Royals 10/14, (Game Three A.L.C.S.)


weams

Recommended Posts

Let's show the Royals that their bullpen is not invincible.

Need to take away their "6 inning game" mentality. A late comeback could chip away at their confidence. This could actually be a blessing in disguise if the Orioles can execute against these three relievers. Nobody is unhittable -- especially not 3 different guys. Expect to see Delmon soon...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
A few inches here and there and we'd be up 2-0 on them. They've played well but have gotten very' date=' very lucky.[/quote']

I'm usually not a "luck" guy, but the matter of inches that have favored KC over BAL this series has been astonishing. On every bloop, diving catch, and broken freaking bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fastball. Waiting for one.

He should be burying it...not pitching to contact.

While it's hard to criticize a 98 mph fastball in on the hands, I think this is emblematic of something the O's should have (and hopefully will do) better in this series. The book on the Royals is that they are a free swinging team too - need more pitches buried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Herrera, wade davis, Hollands?? Welp, lets give it our best.

I said POSITIVE things!!!!

All I know is Buck better do something different here...we gotta mix it up. This game is are only hope.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Glad Bob Melvin and I don’t see eye to eye on that issue Well said, that make two of us, Bunting Ced down 5-3 with nobody out that late in the game is absurd.
    • Sorry to hear this--wishing you a sound recovery, in time for the O's run to the Series! (That would speed up the healing!)
    • Santander is a good case for the Rule V draft. That's unfortunately the same system that's going to make his next contract potentially look bad. If only he were a couple of years younger. It's hard to commit 25+M to a player at 30+. He's going to be missed in Baltimore, on the field and by the fans, but he's someone that they're going to have to let move on. 
    • While I agree and find your comment funny, maybe just say something along the line of”Don’t give up on this team” or “Quite being Debbie downers” instead of assuming they are projecting the own misery in their lives. People might take it better if it doesn’t feel like a personal attack. Either way, that win felt good and I HOPE this is finally the turning point going into the playoffs soon. 
    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...