Jump to content

Caleb for full-time DH vs LHP when Wieters returns


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

This is what I think will happen as well. It wouldn't make sense to sit Wieters against LHP when his OPS is 120 points higher against left handed pitching.

I think the idea is they would both hit against LHP's (one DH and one catch).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think the idea is they would both hit against LHP's (one DH and one catch).

Right, but we all know that won't happen. I was basing it on only one of them in the lineup. The poster I was replying to was also going off of that assumption, I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, but we all know that won't happen. I was basing it on only one of them in the lineup. The poster I was replying to was also going off of that assumption, I believe.

Correct. I still consider the OP's point as valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Travis Snider has a higher career wOBA vs lefties than Caleb does. Let's stop overreacting to a hot month, okay?

Every inexplicable, 1-in-1000, late career surge begins with a hot month. Any day now Max Mercy is going to remember that it was Caleb Joseph who struck out the Whammer by those train tracks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something often overlooked is that the PITCHING seemed to get significantly better last season after Wieters went down and Caleb started catching regularly. The kid calls a great game and I'm worried that even though Wieters had a rep for doing the same, that most of the pitchers are now on the same wave length as Caleb and it might not be such a smooth transition going to back to Wieters for most of the starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every inexplicable, 1-in-1000, late career surge begins with a hot month. Any day now Max Mercy is going to remember that it was Caleb Joseph who struck out the Whammer by those train tracks.

And the 999 other times it is fools gold, and you end up playing a guy a bunch at DH who has negative offensive value trying to see if you're the lucky lottery winner.

We have access to advanced stats for this very reason. They can help tell us when breakouts are real. Caleb has a .321 BABIP this season, compared to a .246 last year. Which one do you think is more accurate for a not that fast fly ball hitter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every inexplicable, 1-in-1000, late career surge begins with a hot month. Any day now Max Mercy is going to remember that it was Caleb Joseph who struck out the Whammer by those train tracks.

No hayseed ever struck out the Whammer. Ever!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the 999 other times it is fools gold, and you end up playing a guy a bunch at DH who has negative offensive value trying to see if you're the lucky lottery winner.

We have access to advanced stats for this very reason. They can help tell us when breakouts are real. Caleb has a .321 BABIP this season, compared to a .246 last year. Which one do you think is more accurate for a not that fast fly ball hitter?

I'm not disagreeing with you at all. Joseph's MLB line is .227/.295/.381. He's 29. Odds are reasonable that he'll trend towards that career mark, and that's not something you really want at DH if you can help it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not disagreeing with you at all. Joseph's MLB line is .227/.295/.381. He's 29. Odds are reasonable that he'll trend towards that career mark, and that's not something you really want at DH if you can help it.

In 2013, that probably would have been better than what they got out of the DH that season. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not disagreeing with you at all. Joseph's MLB line is .227/.295/.381. He's 29. Odds are reasonable that he'll trend towards that career mark, and that's not something you really want at DH if you can help it.

I'm not sure 117 MLB games is enough to derive a sample size that one should have a lot of confidence in.

I'd settle for his career minor league line (.753).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure 117 MLB games is enough to derive a sample size that one should have a lot of confidence in.

I'd settle for his career minor league line (.753).

Sure. But most of his minor league career line is as a older-than-league, repeating-league AA player. It would be quite amazing if he was able to produce at a mark equal to that in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...