Jump to content

The Battle for .500

Moose Milligan

By Moose Milligan
in Orioles Talk

Does this team finish above .500?  

39 members have voted

  1. 1. Does this team finish above .500?

    • Yes! (but just barely)
      10
    • Nope. Heading into the abyss.
      29

Recommended Posts

Moose Milligan Hangout Grand Counsel

Moose Milligan

Posted
Posted

With the season heading into the final month and the playoff chances slipping seemingly day by day, this rest of this season (for me, anyway) is about individual performances (Manny, Schoop, Davis, Gausman, Givens) and seeing if we can finish above .500 for the 4th season in a row.

It'll be a hard road, I believe we have the 2nd toughest schedule in the league moving forward.

What say you, do we finish above .500 or not? State your arguments for or against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
maybenxtyr Hangout Veteran Council

maybenxtyr

Posted
Posted

I don't see them finishing over.500. Tough schedule, and a bad team make a bad combination for achieving this goal. A few years ago I would have been besides myself about the way this season has gone down, but as I age I'm realizing how unimportant baseball is anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tntoriole Hangout Grand Counsel

tntoriole

Posted
Posted

I would not have thought this would be possible, but given the schedule remaining, the current state of the starters who ALL. with the possible exception of Chen, seem to be in bad funks, and with what I see as a worsening team attitude- they really seem to be going through the motions in a lot of games, I think a death spiral is more likely than not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aristotelian Hangout Grand Counsel

Aristotelian

Posted
Posted

Bottom line is we are missing the playoffs. .500 is an arbitrary line. I really don't care if we win 79 or 82 games. I am much more interested in whether Urrutia or Alvarez can OPS .750, Givens can maintain anything close to his production, Roe can get back to his first half production, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SeaBird Major Leaguer

SeaBird

Posted
Posted
I don't think we do. This team only scores when hitting homers and that seems to be growing more and more evident by the day. This team hasn't been consistent all season and while I think it'll be close, this team falls just short.

Bingo! Too reliant on the home runs. It's like an all or nothing approach. Tough, tough schedule for the remaining 34 games to hope for anything much higher than .500. Frobby posted that they have had one winning month all season. No evidence or performances to indicate that September will be any different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aristotelian Hangout Grand Counsel

Aristotelian

Posted
Posted
The trouble is our F/A will start thinking about where they will land next year. It starts

to take the heart out of there game. End of year.

They will have a short memory if the O's make them the best offer to stay. More likely, the O's will continue to play the vets, but will not make them the best offer, and the vets will leave anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Can_of_corn Hangout Grand Counsel

Can_of_corn

Posted
Posted
With the season heading into the final month and the playoff chances slipping seemingly day by day, this rest of this season (for me, anyway) is about individual performances (Manny, Schoop, Davis, Gausman, Givens) and seeing if we can finish above .500 for the 4th season in a row.

It'll be a hard road, I believe we have the 2nd toughest schedule in the league moving forward.

What say you, do we finish above .500 or not? State your arguments for or against.

This is where I am.

I won't root against the team but I have to admit it would be nice, if they are not making the playoffs, if they end up with a protected first round pick.

Just sayin'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
webbrick2010 Hangout Veteran Council

webbrick2010

Posted
Posted

I believe we are a lock for last place in the AL East

We have the least talent on the ML roster

and the least talent in our farm system

The Red Sox have turned the corner, with great young talent (Bogaerts, Castillo, Bradley JR, Betts, Swihart, ERod) leading the way. They will pass us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uli2001 Hangout Grand Counsel

Uli2001

Posted
Posted

There should have been a third option in the poll, "undecided." There are pro and con reasons for a winning record right now. The con reasons were exposed by previous posters. The pro reasons are Buck Showalter's track record of finishing strong and the fact that they have been playing under their talent level (i.e., underachieving). It is plausible, in my opinion, that they could still "turn it on" before all is said and done. I would say it's around 50/50 right now that they finish above .500. One more week of poor play will definitely tip the scales towards a losing season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jjnono All-Star

jjnono

Posted
Posted

Twice in the last year the FO, IMHO, failed to make this team better; once in the offseason, and again at the trade deadline (although I don't really know how much interest there was in our FAs). I think a losing record is probably guaranteed. I said this was a 80-84 win team on paper at the outset, and I don't see anything to make me think that won't be true. The starting pitching just isn't good enough (disappointing), and the talent level at both the ML and MiL level doesn't inspire confidence that a turnaround is on the horizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nevermore All-Star

Nevermore

Posted
Posted
There should have been a third option in the poll, "undecided." There are pro and con reasons for a winning record right now. The con reasons were exposed by previous posters. The pro reasons are Buck Showalter's track record of finishing strong and the fact that they have been playing under their talent level (i.e., underachieving). It is plausible, in my opinion, that they could still "turn it on" before all is said and done. I would say it's around 50/50 right now that they finish above .500. One more week of poor play will definitely tip the scales towards a losing season.
I agree. I voted that they would barely finish above .500, but I could have voted the other way. I'm just not sure.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MdSooner Hangout Grand Counsel

MdSooner

Posted
Posted

I voted yes. Just by 1 game or 2. (The same as I did in this poll prior to the start of the season.

But Buck might not decide to play all of our FA's and give an open audition for the guys most likely returning next yr to show what they have.

I don't know :noidea:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Can_of_corn Hangout Grand Counsel

Can_of_corn

Posted
Posted
I voted yes. Just by 1 game or 2. (The same as I did in this poll prior to the start of the season.

But Buck might not decide to play all of our FA's and give an open audition for the guys most likely returning next yr to show what they have.

I don't know :noidea:

I don't see Buck doing that. Maybe Pearce gets squeezed for playing time, but that would be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Too Tall
      How should we look at FA contracts going forward?

      By Too Tall · Posted

      This is spot on. If Rubenstein means what he says, (Eilas/Sigbot will run the show) the question is what will Elias do with more resourses? How is Elias going to meld free agencey with a bigger budget and team needs going forward. I do not see Sigbot buying into long term high dollar deals for pitching. Particularly for 30 plus year old pitching. I feel any long term deals will be calculated around mutual advantage for team and player with as little risk as possible. I sure don't see Sigbot paying out eight years for three to four years potential benefit.   
    • Sports Guy
      How should we look at FA contracts going forward?

      By Sports Guy · Posted

      Well first of all, how are you defining an impact starter?  I would guess you didn’t think Bradish would make an impact. I think out of Povich or McDermott that one of them can give us good enough starter innings. How much of an impact? Who knows. Ceiling is definitely higher with them than Kremer though.  Is Kremer an impact guy. Did you think he would be 2-3 years ago? Now, a guy like Luis DeLeon?  High impact potential there.  And we will see with guys like Baumeister, who we have seen so little of so far. You don’t have to spend 9 figures to invest in pitching. You can trade for it. That’s an investment.   You can make more sensible FA signings.    
    • MTMan13
      Who Should Be Extension Priority #1?

      By MTMan13 · Posted

      If I’m writing the checks, I test out Gunnar, Holliday, Cowser, and Adley in that order.  IMO Gunnar is the obvious choice. Not because others aren’t deserving, but because Gunnar has the potential to get MUCH more expensive than he would be to extend today. Hes a realistic MVP candidate, plays great defense at a premium position, and will hit FA at 27.  The Witt contract at 11/288 ($26mm aav) as a starting point is actually a great DEAL relative to the average of the top 5 3B / SS contracts, which all orbit $30-$35mm AAV, and before any natural inflation over the next years of team control. Said differently, we would likely save $5-10mm per year by extending Gunnar now, which seems like a no brainer to me.   I don’t think the value of Burnes / Adley (finished products, too close to FA), or Holliday (generationally wealthy family) will change much between now and the decision point. Gunnar’s will only go up . Cowser wasn’t mentioned, and it’s probably not realistic for chemistry reasons until at least Santander has hit FA, but we may be looking at a 35 HR type of bat with solid defense. I’d like to lock that up.   
    • clapdiddy
      How should we look at FA contracts going forward?

      By clapdiddy · Posted

      Agree with this.   The number one priority should be locking up Henderson, Holliday, and to a lesser extent, Adley.   Not that I don't want Adley around...I'm just not sure how many years you want to invest in a catcher.   Making a deal for a guy like Burnes this year could be an annual/semi-annual kind of thing.   Maybe you splurge one year and trade for a guy with two years left before FA where you may have to give up a bigger prospect.    I don't think it's smart to have long-term money in pitching.  
    • Matt Bennett
      How should we look at FA contracts going forward?

      By Matt Bennett · Posted

      Based on the current state of the organization, I'm curious to see what this homegrown rotation looks like. What are the odds there's an impact SP in Seth Johnson, Chayce McDermott, and Cade Povich? Pretty low. What are the odds all 3 are busts? Pretty low. A likely median scenario is you have 1 serviceable SP, a reliever, and a bust. Or something along those lines.  I for one am much happier Burnes is in the rotation rather than Bassit, Eovaldi, or someone of that caliber. My preference would have been both once we learned about the Bradish + Means injuries. This time, we paid for the Burnes type front of the rotation pitcher in years of prospect control. I don't think that will always be a luxury we can afford.  Almost an entirely homegrown lineup and a GM who has shown the ability to piece together a productive bullpen. The rotation is where you strike. But it takes investments. No reason the Nationals can sign Scherzer and go win themselves a World Series and that avenue of success building is cut off to our collection of billionaire owners running a bottom 5 payroll currently. 
    • Aristotelian
      How should we look at FA contracts going forward?

      By Aristotelian · Posted

      I would go for older but still elite/above average guys in areas of need who will sign short term deals even if they are high AAV, like some of those Verlander and Nelson Cruz contracts. Sonny Gray would have been good this year. Not sure who the equivalent guys will be next year but I don't see us being in the market for 10+/$300+ type deals. At least I hope we aren't.
    • Since1984
      How should we look at FA contracts going forward?

      By Since1984 · Posted

      I do not think the Orioles will spend >$200m on annual payroll anytime soon, but they have room to sign. Burnes Ace type every 3-6 years.    I would offer $150 over 5 years with incentives and options that could exceed $200m, to hedge a sunk cost for injuries.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...