Jump to content

The Orioles should trade for Ben Revere


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

Not what I was getting at. He's only been up 2 years. We give schoop a pass when it comes to the bat, but we don't give it to revere. That's dumb

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Service Time (01/2016): 4.149

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/reverbe01.shtml

Revere is 28.

Schoop is 24.

I promise you I won't be giving Schoop a pass in four years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Not what I was getting at. He's only been up 2 years. We give schoop a pass when it comes to the bat, but we don't give it to revere. That's dumb

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/reverbe01.shtml

Revere is 28.

Schoop is 24.

I promise you I won't be giving Schoop a pass in four years.

Revere

2010 (22) - .412 OPS (30 PA)

2011 (23) - .619 OPS (481 PA)

2012 (24) - .675 OPS (553 PA)

2013 (25) - .691 OPS (315 PA)

2014 (26) - .686 OPS (626 PA)

2015 (27) - .719 OPS (634 PA)

Schoop

2013 (21) - .833 OPS (15 PA)

2014 (22) - .598 OPS (481 PA)

2015 (23) - .788 OPS (321 PA)

Look at their respective 2015s. Schoop had an OPS 60 points higher in his age-23 season vs. Revere's career high in his age-27 season. It was his second significant season vs. Revere's fifth. Using Schoop as some sort of comparable for what chances people are giving or not giving to Revere is misguided.

Funny enough, they actually have identical career OPS's of .677. The difference is that Schoop is trending upward headed into his age-24 season and has 817 career PA, while Revere has been on a plateau for the most part headed into his age-28 season and has 2,660 career PA (more than 3x that of Schoop).

tl;dr - AAEAAQAAAAAAAAIYAAAAJDZiMjY3ZmQyLWQyNjAtNGUxNi1hZjc2LWJkZjkzZWZjZGU0Yg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not what I was getting at. He's only been up 2 years. We give schoop a pass when it comes to the bat, but we don't give it to revere. That's dumb.

It's only dumb if you have some reason to totally discount four prime years of development. And the casual observation/scouting reports/stats that show Schoop with more power in his index finger than Revere does in his whole body. When Revere was Schoop's age he had an .042 (!) ISO, and 14 extra base hits in 482 PAs. Schoops' ISO at 23 was almost identical to Adam Jones' at 29.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's only dumb if you have some reason to totally discount four prime years of development. And the casual observation/scouting reports/stats that show Schoop with more power in his index finger than Revere does in his whole body. When Revere was Schoop's age he had an .042 (!) ISO, and 14 extra base hits in 482 PAs. Schoops' ISO at 23 was almost identical to Adam Jones' at 29.

Gives me even more reason to love schoop more than I do

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...