Jump to content

Clubhouse Chemistry


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

While the chemistry that exists is nice to see I don't think it exists without the leadership of Buck. I'll disagree with his tactics at times, but to me he was absolutely the person to turn the franchise culture around.

The players instantly knew they were accountable but he also cultivated relationships unlike his previous stops. It helps immensely a player like Jones was so invested in winning and bought into his philosophy. Once he had the respect of Jones the others were more likely to be on board.

Without Showalter being hired there likely isn't a turnaround and the chemistry isn't being talked about. Right guy at the right time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the chemistry that exists is nice to see I don't think it exists without the leadership of Buck. I'll disagree with his tactics at times, but to me he was absolutely the person to turn the franchise culture around.

The players instantly knew they were accountable but he also cultivated relationships unlike his previous stops. It helps immensely a player like Jones was so invested in winning and bought into his philosophy. Once he had the respect of Jones the others were more likely to be on board.

Without Showalter being hired there likely isn't a turnaround and the chemistry isn't being talked about. Right guy at the right time.

Peter originally wanted to hire him right out the gate in 2010, but waited on it to see how Dave Trembly did that year.

Sent from Neverneverland using James Hetfield's voice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Roseman told me that in his time away from a position of influence with the Eagles last year, he learned about the business of sport and the cultivation and development of players from franchise-runners in the NBA, Major League Baseball, NHL and the English Premier League. That’s right. He said that his time at a British sports seminar last November gave him a chance to learn a lot from some of the power teams in world soccer—Chelsea, Manchester United, Bayern Munich, Manchester City—about the importance of character in team-building, and about the skills needed to meld players speaking different languages from different cultures with a team of totally different people.

http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/03/13/howie-roseman-philadelphia-eagles-nfl-free-agency

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...