Jump to content

Buck: Kang Was Slow in Spring Training Too


CaptainRedbeard

Recommended Posts

I saw this in Roch's latest blog from Showalter:

"I was talking to somebody with the Pirates about Jung Ho (Kang), how slow he started for them last spring. We need to keep it in mind. You think about all the adjustments he's going through."

I got curious, so I looked it up.

Kim's had 25 PA and is 0-24 with 0 BB's but only 3 K's.

In his first 26 PA in spring training last year, Kang went 3-23 with 3 BB's and 9 K's, good for a .130/.259/.304 line.

Kang finished spring training with a .200/.280/.444 line and then went on to slash .287/.355/.461 in the regular season.

It's a big jump from Korea's level of competition to the major leagues, and it sounds like some adjustment is to be expected. IMO, the fact that Kim has only struck out 3 times is a very good sign. He's a big man, he's putting the ball in play and reports have been that at least some of them are hit with authority.

The hits will come, I wouldn't give up on him just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes the consistent contact is very encouraging. He's probably not caring about walks yet as well.

I agree. I noticed that Kim and Rickard, both known for their eye and taking walks, have both had 24 abs and no walks this spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I noticed that Kim and Rickard, both known for their eye and taking walks, have both had 24 abs and no walks this spring.

That is interesting, definitely. Part of that is probably the effect of them wanting to impress the coaches, and walks don't feel as impressive. Another effect is that they are probably being challenged more regularly by major league pitchers than they have been before. You kind of need to show that you can hit the major league fastball before the scouting report changes.

I've watched a handful of Rickard and Kim at bats and their plate discipline looks pretty good to me. Not expanding the zone, taking close pitches, working counts. They're just getting their pitches to hit and swinging at them, Rickard with more luck than Kim so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is interesting, definitely. Part of that is probably the effect of them wanting to impress the coaches, and walks don't feel as impressive. Another effect is that they are probably being challenged more regularly by major league pitchers than they have been before. You kind of need to show that you can hit the major league fastball before the scouting report changes.

I've watched a handful of Rickard and Kim at bats and their plate discipline looks pretty good to me. Not expanding the zone, taking close pitches, working counts. They're just getting their pitches to hit and swinging at them, Rickard with more luck than Kim so far.

...and that is good for Rickard because some scouts predicted (as you noted) that mlb pitchers would come right after him and that he may not be able to get those hits. I hope he keeps proving them wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and that is good for Rickard because some scouts predicted (as you noted) that mlb pitchers would come right after him and that he may not be able to get those hits. I hope he keeps proving them wrong.

Yes indeed. The key is that Rickard will need to show enough power for pitchers to respect him in order to get walks. If all you can hit is singles, pitchers will just keep coming right at you, a la Juan Pierre or Ben Revere. The same will be true for Kim.

So far Rickard has two doubles, which is a nice sign. Of course when dealing with such small sample sizes, it is very hard to draw any significant meaning out of any of this. You can only look for what appear to be positive indicators or red flags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Kim it seems he lets the ball travel deep in the zone, which allows him to track it better, and hit the off speed stuff. In Korea the separation between off speed and FB probably wasn't as great as in the ML. My guess he is working to adjust his timing to the greater separation. Not an easy task.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have noticed watching his at-bats the last few games Kim seems more focused on trying to hit the ball the other way. With the early shifts on him, that makes total sense.

I'm willing to treat Kim's spring hitting no different than the first couple weeks a pitcher has trying to get his timing and mix in a pitch he is getting more familiar with.

Once April rolls around, I'll still have a long leash on the hits, but I wanna see some nice walks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Kim it seems he lets the ball travel deep in the zone, which allows him to track it better, and hit the off speed stuff. In Korea the separation between off speed and FB probably wasn't as great as in the ML. My guess he is working to adjust his timing to the greater separation. Not an easy task.

Yes, I think this is a great characterization of the adjustment. It's certainly difficult, but not insurmountable.

It's only a real problem if he doesn't have the bat speed to hit the major league fastballs and has to cheat by starting his swing earlier, costing him time for pitch ID and tracking. Given that he doesn't appear to have a long swing and isn't striking out by having fastballs blown past him, I think he's going to be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw this in Roch's latest blog from Showalter:

I got curious, so I looked it up.

Kim's had 25 PA and is 0-24 with 0 BB's but only 3 K's.

In his first 26 PA in spring training last year, Kang went 3-23 with 3 BB's and 9 K's, good for a .130/.259/.304 line.

Kang finished spring training with a .200/.280/.444 line and then went on to slash .287/.355/.461 in the regular season.

It's a big jump from Korea's level of competition to the major leagues, and it sounds like some adjustment is to be expected. IMO, the fact that Kim has only struck out 3 times is a very good sign. He's a big man, he's putting the ball in play and reports have been that at least some of them are hit with authority.

The hits will come, I wouldn't give up on him just yet.

Thanks for posting, definitely a reason for hope. Let's hope he figures it out too.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw this in Roch's latest blog from Showalter:

I got curious, so I looked it up.

Kim's had 25 PA and is 0-24 with 0 BB's but only 3 K's.

In his first 26 PA in spring training last year, Kang went 3-23 with 3 BB's and 9 K's, good for a .130/.259/.304 line.

Kang finished spring training with a .200/.280/.444 line and then went on to slash .287/.355/.461 in the regular season.

It's a big jump from Korea's level of competition to the major leagues, and it sounds like some adjustment is to be expected. IMO, the fact that Kim has only struck out 3 times is a very good sign. He's a big man, he's putting the ball in play and reports have been that at least some of them are hit with authority.

The hits will come, I wouldn't give up on him just yet.

Just because I didn't know this... When CD got picked off 2nd to end the inning that was a PA for Kim. Then to lead off the next inning was another PA? 2 PA, 1 AB. Is that right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...