Jump to content

Buck: Kang Was Slow in Spring Training Too


CaptainRedbeard

Recommended Posts

Yes, I think this is a great characterization of the adjustment. It's certainly difficult, but not insurmountable.

It's only a real problem if he doesn't have the bat speed to hit the major league fastballs and has to cheat by starting his swing earlier, costing him time for pitch ID and tracking. Given that he doesn't appear to have a long swing and isn't striking out by having fastballs blown past him, I think he's going to be ok.

Good stuff! That's what I have noticed from the get-go in his first AB at Disney. He wasn't overmatched. He has good pitch recognition and does let the ball travel deep. He fouls off pitcher's pitches. He hit a sharp grounder to first off a tough lefty in his third AB that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is 24 ABs people!!! :) No walks yet, heaven forbid lets jump ship now!!!

If he hasn't walked or batted to his norm in such a small sample size so be it. The sample size is just too small at this point for me to worry.

Maybe after 60 ABs with similar results my anxiety will be ticking higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. The other PA was a HBP.

Yeah I was just manually adding that in my head. I only found the spring training game logs on MLB.com and just added them together, and they don't included HBP, so if Kang had any I didn't account for them. In fact, I forgot to add Kim's hit yesterday, so he's actually 1-24. Pretty sure everything else is right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hits will come, I wouldn't give up on him just yet.

Giving up on someone after a week's worth of spring ABs is reactionary and short-sighted in the extreme. Remember when Caleb Joseph began his MLB career 1-for-26? Or how Cal was hitting .169 on May 10th of his rookie year, after hitting .128 in his '81 cup of coffee? Knee-jerk is no way to run a baseball team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hits will come. I wouldn't give up on him just yet.

Giving up on someone after a week's worth of spring ABs is reactionary and short-sighted in the extreme. Remember when Caleb Joseph began his MLB career 1-for-26? Or how Cal was hitting .169 on May 10th of his rookie year, after hitting .128 in his '81 cup of coffee? Knee-jerk is no way to run a baseball team.

Willie Mays started his career 1-for-26, also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is 24 ABs people!!! :) No walks yet, heaven forbid lets jump ship now!!!

If he hasn't walked or batted to his norm in such a small sample size so be it. The sample size is just too small at this point for me to worry.

Maybe after 60 ABs with similar results my anxiety will be ticking higher.

I am the one who brought up the 24 abs for both Rickard and Kim, and my intention was simply to show that their approach may be a bit different than it would be in real game situations...that basically they are working on things and being a bit more aggressive than they might be otherwise. Just like pitchers working on new pitches or those they have less confidence in. I didn't see anyone in this thread who was panicking or making overly dramatic statements. Certainly none like in another thread where a poster has already described Kim as complete waste of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...