Jump to content

Jesse Biddle - Why not?


LarryBigbie

Recommended Posts

Here's a guy we should look to claim IMO. Intriguing prospect recovering from TJ. Could be worth a flier and a major boost to the farm when healthy. Why not?

Jesse Biddle was on the Pirates Forty-Man Roster. He was designated for assignment to make room for David Freese. To claim would mean that the Orioles would have to remove someone from the Forty Man Roster. The question is as to who on the Forty Man is of less value than is Jesse Biddle??

Biddle does have two option remaining which is upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesse Biddle was on the Pirates Forty-Man Roster. He was designated for assignment to make room for David Freese. To claim would mean that the Orioles would have to remove someone from the Forty Man Roster. The question is as to who on the Forty Man is of less value than is Jesse Biddle??

Biddle does have two option remaining which is upside.

Paredes? He has value, but seems redundant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put in a claim on him. Chaz Roe would be a good DFA candidate. He's out of options. Doesn't look like he's going to crack our pen. Biddle would basically be put on the 40 man for a few weeks then get moved to the 60 man DL as soon as we could.

I figure Parades is safe even though he's out of options because he'll start the season on the DL. The guy that keeps coming to mind is Urrutia. He's pretty far down the depth chart at this point. At his age, I don't see him becoming more than he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put in a claim on him. Chaz Roe would be a good DFA candidate. He's out of options. Doesn't look like he's going to crack our pen. Biddle would basically be put on the 40 man for a few weeks then get moved to the 60 man DL as soon as we could.

I figure Parades is safe even though he's out of options because he'll start the season on the DL. The guy that keeps coming to mind is Urrutia. He's pretty far down the depth chart at this point. At his age, I don't see him becoming more than he is.

Theoretically he could have been out on the 60 Day DL by the Pirates already.

I would rather have had Triggs than making a spot for Biddle. Just don't see it with the way the team is constructed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put in a claim on him. Chaz Roe would be a good DFA candidate. He's out of options. Doesn't look like he's going to crack our pen. Biddle would basically be put on the 40 man for a few weeks then get moved to the 60 man DL as soon as we could

The problem with placing him on the ML 60 Day DL is that he would accumulate service time. Service time at the MLB level makes them free agents sooner than later. Case in Point would be Dylan Bundy, he was optioned and never placed on the MLB 60 Day DL and this protected the service clock IF he ever materializes as a pitcher for the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theoretically he could have been out on the 60 Day DL by the Pirates already.

I would rather have had Triggs than making a spot for Biddle. Just don't see it with the way the team is constructed.

If he has two options he would just need to be on the 40 man. He can rehab at AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

Biddle was drafted in the 1st round back in 2010. That's the good news.

Biddle's numbers at the two highest levels of the minors (AA and AAA) over the most recent 2 seasons have been absolutely atrocious, including a walk rate that was very high. That's the bad news.

If replacing somebody that is already on the 40-man roster is the price that the Orioles would have to pay to acquire him, I would say "No."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Just being a first rounder means zippo. Billy Rowell, for example. Those who show no signs of capability need to find employment elsewhere.

He did show signs of capability in his first 4-plus seasons in the minors (2010 through early 2014.)

He stumbled badly in his last one and-a-half seasons at the AA and AAA levels in 2014 and 2015 ...... although he did pitch well at the AA level in 2013.

I believe that it remains to be seen if he can adjust and pitch as well at AAA and the Major Leagues as he did at the Advanced-A level and AA levels in 2013 and 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...