Jump to content

Why doesn't Buck bunt?


CarolinaCop

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Whole game ticks me off. Bundy is being pushed so it hard to get upset with him.

Buck is too conservative using his bench. I mean is Kim hurt? Tampa had no lefty up in pen and let's Caleb hit. Possible he bunted on his own. Possible.

Also he doesn't pitch Britton so he goes to Detroit not having pitched in 6 days. Don't get that either.

Buck Showalter had asked Caleb Joseph to lay down a bunt, which he did. This used the at bat of Caleb without having to use another player/catcher in the game. The issue was Adam Jones and Michael Bourn striking out.

On the road, you do mnot use your closer in non-save situations. At home it is a different scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck Showalter had asked Caleb Joseph to lay down a bunt, which he did. This used the at bat of Caleb without having to use another player/catcher in the game. The issue was Adam Jones and Michael Bourn striking out.

On the road, you do mnot use your closer in non-save situations. At home it is a different scenario.

Bunting stinks. Save it for the National League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bunting stinks. Save it for the National League.
Can't banish the entire process to the other league. Every situation is different.

Buck obviously wanted to keep Weiters off the field for the day (or 9 innings), so bunting C. Joseph was not the wrong decision IMO. His stats made that decision easy.

OTOH, if the bunt was Caleb's decision.. then bravo to him for being a team player!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bunting stinks. Save it for the National League.

Sacrifice bunting is generally counter-productive, but there are a few specific situations where one run will win the game and it makes sense. The old deadball-era practice of bunting a runner to second early in a game with a batter who isn't wholly incompetent is almost never justifiable. Might be if you're in an extremely depressed run context like two runs/team/game.

Bunting for a hit is often a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sacrifice bunting is generally counter-productive, but there are a few specific situations where one run will win the game and it makes sense. The old deadball-era practice of bunting a runner to second early in a game with a batter who isn't wholly incompetent is almost never justifiable. Might be if you're in an extremely depressed run context like two runs/team/game.

Bunting for a hit is often a good thing.

Good post and I agree.

Brady and then B-Rob, had the speed and ability to bunt for base hits, not too many on this roster have that ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hudson allows a home run, a single and now you want to give a free out which didn't even work taking the O's best hitter out of the lineup?

Of course, then Dickerson follows that up with a bad send with a even worse call from the ump and MLB office review as even a slow Hardy got his foot in and yet was called out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...